Literature DB >> 22965974

Radial artery free and T graft patency as coronary artery bypass conduit over a 15-year period.

Hendrick B Barner1, Marci Bailey, Tracey J Guthrie, Michael K Pasque, Marc R Moon, Ralph J Damiano, Jennifer S Lawton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The radial artery is often used as the second arterial graft for coronary artery bypass grafting. Little is known about the differences in long-term patency between radial free and T grafts. This study was performed to determine long-term radial artery patency over a 15-year period. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Radial arteries were used as free grafts or T grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting over a 15-year period. Patients were contacted to determine if postoperative cardiac catheterization was performed and examination of any reports and films was performed. Grafts were graded as patent, luminal irregularity, or occluded. Each sequential graft was counted separately. Between September 1993 and December 2008, 13,926 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and 3248 patients had at least one radial artery graft used as a conduit. Catheterizations were performed at a mean of 7.4 ± 3.8 years (range, 3 days to 14.4 years) on 372 radial artery grafts (103 free and 269 T) in 215 patients. Kaplan-Meier freedom from occlusion for radial free and T grafts at 1 and 10 years was 97.1% and 75.4% and 99.6% and 62.9%, respectively (P=0.146 free versus T). Kaplan-Meier survival to 15 years was not statistically different between free and T graft patients (P=0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: In 215 patients with postoperative catheterization after coronary artery bypass grafting with a radial artery graft, radial free and T grafts had similar and acceptable long-term patency to support their use as a coronary artery bypass graft conduit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22965974     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.081497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

1.  Bilateral internal mammary arteries: evidence and technical considerations.

Authors:  Michael P Vallely; J James B Edelman; Michael K Wilson
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

2.  How I choose conduits and configure grafts for my patients-rationales and practices.

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

3.  Conduits for Coronary Bypass: Arteries Other Than the Internal Thoracic Artery's.

Authors:  Hendrick B Barner
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-06-05

4.  Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial.

Authors:  Christian L Carranza; Martin Ballegaard; Mads U Werner; Philip Hasbak; Andreas Kjær; Klaus F Kofoed; Jane Lindschou; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Christian Gluud; Peter Skov Olsen; Daniel A Steinbrüchel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Comparison of patency of single and sequential radial artery grafting in coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  Hirofumi Kasahara; Hankei Shin; Tatsuo Takahashi; Satoru Murata; Mitsuharu Mori
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-31

6.  Saphenous graft atherosclerosis as assessed by optical coherence tomography data for stenotic and non-stenotic lesions from the OCTOPUS registry.

Authors:  Grzegorz M Kubiak; Elżbieta Pociask; Wojciech Wańha; Magdalena Dobrolińska; Paweł Gąsior; Grzegorz Smolka; Andrzej Ochała; Zbigniew Gąsior; Wojciech Wojakowski; Tomasz Roleder
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.426

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.