Literature DB >> 22965265

Individual lifetime pollen and nectar foraging preferences in bumble bees.

Jessica Hagbery1, James C Nieh.   

Abstract

Foraging specialization plays an important role in the ability of social insects to efficiently allocate labor. However, relatively little is known about the degree to which individual bumble bees specialize on collecting nectar or pollen, when such preferences manifest, and if individuals can alter their foraging preferences in response to changes in the colony workforce. Using Bombus impatiens, we monitored all foraging visits made by every bee in multiple colonies and showed that individual foragers exhibit consistent lifetime foraging preferences. Based upon the distribution of foraging preferences, we defined three forager types (pollen specialists, nectar specialists, and generalists). In unmanipulated colonies, 16-36 % of individuals specialized (≥90 % of visits) on nectar or pollen only. On its first day of foraging, an individual's foraging choices (nectar only, pollen only, or nectar and pollen) significantly predicted its lifetime foraging preferences. Foragers that only collected pollen on their first day of foraging made 1.61- to 1.67-fold more lifetime pollen foraging visits (as a proportion of total trips) than foragers that only collected nectar on their first foraging day. Foragers were significantly larger than bees that stayed only in the nest. We also determined the effect of removing pollen specialists at early (brood present) or later (brood absent) stages in colony life. These results suggest that generalists can alter their foraging preferences in response to the loss of a small subset of foragers. Thus, bumble bees exhibit individual lifetime foraging preferences that are established early in life, but generalists may be able to adapt to colony needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22965265     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-012-0964-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  13 in total

Review 1.  Models of division of labor in social insects.

Authors:  S N Beshers; J H Fewell
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Division of labour in the honeybee community.

Authors:  C R RIBBANDS
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1952-08-27

3.  A morphologically specialized soldier caste improves colony defense in a neotropical eusocial bee.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; Cristiano Menezes; Vera L Imperatriz-Fonseca; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Neal M Williams; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R E Page; J Erber; M K Fondrk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Gene expression profiles in the brain predict behavior in individual honey bees.

Authors:  Charles W Whitfield; Anne-Marie Cziko; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Pollen foraging: learning a complex motor skill by bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Authors:  Nigel E Raine; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-12-06

8.  Space use of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) revealed by radio-tracking.

Authors:  Melanie Hagen; Martin Wikelski; W Daniel Kissling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Division of labor in the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole is associated with distinct subcaste- and age-related patterns of worker brain organization.

Authors:  Mario L Muscedere; James F A Traniello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Specialization does not predict individual efficiency in an ant.

Authors:  Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  14 in total

1.  High-altitude multi-taskers: bumble bee food plant use broadens along an altitudinal productivity gradient.

Authors:  Nicole E Miller-Struttmann; Candace Galen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Five decades of misunderstanding in the social Hymenoptera: a review and meta-analysis of Michener's paradox.

Authors:  Robert L Jeanne; Kevin J Loope; Andrew M Bouwma; Erik V Nordheim; Michael L Smith
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-25

3.  Divergent rules for pollen and nectar foraging bumblebees--a laboratory study with artificial flowers offering diluted nectar substitute and pollen surrogate.

Authors:  Sabine Konzmann; Klaus Lunau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Specialization on pollen or nectar in bumblebee foragers is not associated with ovary size, lipid reserves or sensory tuning.

Authors:  Adam R Smith; Peter Graystock; William O H Hughes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Patterns of pollen and nectar foraging specialization by bumblebees over multiple timescales using RFID.

Authors:  Avery L Russell; Sarah J Morrison; Eleni H Moschonas; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Complex-to-predict generational shift between nested and clustered organization of individual prey networks in digger wasps.

Authors:  Yolanda Ballesteros; Carlo Polidori; José Tormos; Laura Baños-Picón; Josep Daniel Asís
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bumblebee learning and memory is impaired by chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide.

Authors:  Dara A Stanley; Karen E Smith; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants.

Authors:  Dara A Stanley; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.608

9.  Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens.

Authors:  Meagan A Simons; Adam R Smith
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  An analysis of the energetic reward offered by field bean (Vicia faba) flowers: Nectar, pollen, and operative force.

Authors:  Emily J Bailes; Jonathan G Pattrick; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.