BACKGROUND: For patients with localized esophageal cancer (EC) who can withstand surgery, the preferred therapy is chemoradiation followed by surgery (trimodality). However, after achieving a clinical complete response [clinCR; defined as both post-chemoradiation endoscopic biopsy showing no cancer and physiologic uptake by positron emission tomography (PET)], some patients decline surgery. The literature on the outcome of such patients is sparse. METHOD: Between 2002 and 2011, we identified 622 trimodality-eligible EC patients in our prospectively maintained databases. All patients had to be trimodality eligible and must have completed preoperative staging after chemoradiation that included repeat endoscopic biopsy and PET among other routine tests. RESULTS: Out of 622 trimodality-eligible patients identified, 61 patients (9.8%) declined surgery. All 61 patients had a clinCR. The median age was 69 years (range 47-85). Males (85.2%) and Caucasians (88.5%) were dominant. Baseline stage was II (44.2%) or III (52.5%), and histology was adenocarcinoma (65.6%) or squamous cell carcinoma (29.5%). Forty-two patients are alive at a median follow-up of 50.9 months (95% CI 39.5-62.3). The 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 58.1 ± 8.4 and 35.3 ± 7.6%, respectively. Of 13 patients with local recurrence during surveillance, 12 had successful salvage resection. CONCLUSION: Although the outcome of 61 EC patients with clinCR who declined surgery appears reasonable, in the absence of a validated prediction/prognosis model, surgery must be encouraged for all trimodality-eligible patients.
BACKGROUND: For patients with localized esophageal cancer (EC) who can withstand surgery, the preferred therapy is chemoradiation followed by surgery (trimodality). However, after achieving a clinical complete response [clinCR; defined as both post-chemoradiation endoscopic biopsy showing no cancer and physiologic uptake by positron emission tomography (PET)], some patients decline surgery. The literature on the outcome of such patients is sparse. METHOD: Between 2002 and 2011, we identified 622 trimodality-eligible EC patients in our prospectively maintained databases. All patients had to be trimodality eligible and must have completed preoperative staging after chemoradiation that included repeat endoscopic biopsy and PET among other routine tests. RESULTS: Out of 622 trimodality-eligible patients identified, 61 patients (9.8%) declined surgery. All 61 patients had a clinCR. The median age was 69 years (range 47-85). Males (85.2%) and Caucasians (88.5%) were dominant. Baseline stage was II (44.2%) or III (52.5%), and histology was adenocarcinoma (65.6%) or squamous cell carcinoma (29.5%). Forty-two patients are alive at a median follow-up of 50.9 months (95% CI 39.5-62.3). The 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 58.1 ± 8.4 and 35.3 ± 7.6%, respectively. Of 13 patients with local recurrence during surveillance, 12 had successful salvage resection. CONCLUSION: Although the outcome of 61 EC patients with clinCR who declined surgery appears reasonable, in the absence of a validated prediction/prognosis model, surgery must be encouraged for all trimodality-eligible patients.
Authors: P van Hagen; M C C M Hulshof; J J B van Lanschot; E W Steyerberg; M I van Berge Henegouwen; B P L Wijnhoven; D J Richel; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; G A P Hospers; J J Bonenkamp; M A Cuesta; R J B Blaisse; O R C Busch; F J W ten Kate; G-J Creemers; C J A Punt; J T M Plukker; H M W Verheul; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; H van Dekken; M J C van der Sangen; T Rozema; K Biermann; J C Beukema; A H M Piet; C M van Rij; J G Reinders; H W Tilanus; A van der Gaast Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jaffer A Ajani; James S Barthel; David J Bentrem; Thomas A D'Amico; Prajnan Das; Crystal S Denlinger; Charles S Fuchs; Hans Gerdes; Robert E Glasgow; James A Hayman; Wayne L Hofstetter; David H Ilson; Rajesh N Keswani; Lawrence R Kleinberg; W Michael Korn; A Craig Lockhart; Mary F Mulcahy; Mark B Orringer; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; James A Posey; Aaron R Sasson; Walter J Scott; Stephen Shibata; Vivian E M Strong; Thomas K Varghese; Graham Warren; Mary Kay Washington; Christopher Willett; Cameron D Wright Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Akihiro Suzuki; Lianchun Xiao; Yuki Hayashi; Homer A Macapinlac; James Welsh; Steven H Lin; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Dipen M Maru; Wayne L Hofstetter; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J S Cooper; M D Guo; A Herskovic; J S Macdonald; J A Martenson; M Al-Sarraf; R Byhardt; A H Russell; J J Beitler; S Spencer; S O Asbell; M V Graham; L L Leichman Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-05-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Heta Javeri; Lianchun Xiao; Eric Rohren; Ritsuko Komaki; Wayne Hofstetter; Jeffrey H Lee; Dipen Maru; Manoop S Bhutani; Stephen G Swisher; Xuemei Wang; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: N K S Cheedella; A Suzuki; L Xiao; W L Hofstetter; D M Maru; T Taketa; K Sudo; M A Blum; S H Lin; J Welch; J H Lee; M S Bhutani; D C Rice; A A Vaporciyan; S G Swisher; J A Ajani Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Berend Jan van der Wilk; Ben M Eyck; Manon C W Spaander; Roelf Valkema; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Bas P L Wijnhoven; J Jan B van Lanschot Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Maria J Valkema; Berend J van der Wilk; Ben M Eyck; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Manon C W Spaander; Michail Doukas; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Wendy M J Schreurs; Mark J Roef; J Jan B van Lanschot; Roelf Valkema Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Bo Jan Noordman; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Jurjen J Boonstra; Peter Paul L O Coene; Jan Willem T Dekker; Michael Doukas; Ate van der Gaast; Joos Heisterkamp; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Jean-Pierre E N Pierie; Camiel Rosman; Johanna W van Sandick; Maurice J C van der Sangen; Meindert N Sosef; Manon C W Spaander; Roelf Valkema; Edwin S van der Zaag; Ewout W Steyerberg; J Jan B van Lanschot Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: A S Borggreve; S Mook; M Verheij; V E M Mul; J J Bergman; A Bartels-Rutten; L C Ter Beek; R G H Beets-Tan; R J Bennink; M I van Berge Henegouwen; L A A Brosens; I L Defize; J M van Dieren; H Dijkstra; R van Hillegersberg; M C Hulshof; H W M van Laarhoven; M G E H Lam; A L H M W van Lier; C T Muijs; W B Nagengast; A J Nederveen; W Noordzij; J T M Plukker; P S N van Rossum; J P Ruurda; J W van Sandick; B L A M Weusten; F E M Voncken; D Yakar; G J Meijer Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-10-20 Impact factor: 4.430