Craig W Hendrix1. 1. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. chendrix@jhmi.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) clinical trial results using antiretrovirals can seem confusing, if not conflicting. We review recent antiretroviral pharmacokinetic studies to help explain PrEP trial results. RECENT FINDINGS: Pharmacokinetic studies indicate that topical dosing, compared with oral dosing, achieves far higher colon and vaginal tissue drug concentrations, and far lower drug concentrations in blood. After oral dosing, higher tenofovir diphosphate concentrations are found in colon tissue than cervico-vaginal tissue, but the reverse is the case for emtricitabine triphosphate, although it does not persist as long. Vaginal dosing achieves measurable tenofovir concentrations in the rectum and vice versa. Within and among oral PrEP trials, increased drug concentration is associated with increased HIV protection, with drug concentration differences best explained by adherence, rather than pharmacokinetics. The poor level of protection in topical studies is not consistent with concentration-response in oral studies indicating unknown variables in need of further investigation. SUMMARY: Sparse pharmacokinetic sampling in large trials combined with more intensive sampling in smaller pharmacokinetic-focused studies help explain trial outcome differences due largely to differences in adherence, tissue pharmacokinetics, and type of HIV exposure. Pharmacokinetic analysis can identify protective drug concentration targets, guide dose optimization, and inform future trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) clinical trial results using antiretrovirals can seem confusing, if not conflicting. We review recent antiretroviral pharmacokinetic studies to help explain PrEP trial results. RECENT FINDINGS: Pharmacokinetic studies indicate that topical dosing, compared with oral dosing, achieves far higher colon and vaginal tissue drug concentrations, and far lower drug concentrations in blood. After oral dosing, higher tenofovir diphosphate concentrations are found in colon tissue than cervico-vaginal tissue, but the reverse is the case for emtricitabine triphosphate, although it does not persist as long. Vaginal dosing achieves measurable tenofovir concentrations in the rectum and vice versa. Within and among oral PrEP trials, increased drug concentration is associated with increased HIV protection, with drug concentration differences best explained by adherence, rather than pharmacokinetics. The poor level of protection in topical studies is not consistent with concentration-response in oral studies indicating unknown variables in need of further investigation. SUMMARY: Sparse pharmacokinetic sampling in large trials combined with more intensive sampling in smaller pharmacokinetic-focused studies help explain trial outcome differences due largely to differences in adherence, tissue pharmacokinetics, and type of HIV exposure. Pharmacokinetic analysis can identify protective drug concentration targets, guide dose optimization, and inform future trials.
Authors: Nicolette A Louissaint; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Edward J Fuchs; Rahul P Bakshi; Ying-Jun Cao; Linda A Lee; Jeff Goldsmith; Brian S Caffo; Yong Du; Karen E King; Frederick A Menendez; Michael S Torbenson; Craig W Hendrix Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-01-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Nicolette A Louissaint; Edward J Fuchs; Rahul P Bakshi; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Yong Du; Katarzyna J Macura; Karen E King; Richard Wahl; Arthur J Goldsmith; Brian Caffo; Ying Jun Cao; Jean Anderson; Craig W Hendrix Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Robert M Grant; Javier R Lama; Peter L Anderson; Vanessa McMahan; Albert Y Liu; Lorena Vargas; Pedro Goicochea; Martín Casapía; Juan Vicente Guanira-Carranza; Maria E Ramirez-Cardich; Orlando Montoya-Herrera; Telmo Fernández; Valdilea G Veloso; Susan P Buchbinder; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Mauro Schechter; Linda-Gail Bekker; Kenneth H Mayer; Esper Georges Kallás; K Rivet Amico; Kathleen Mulligan; Lane R Bushman; Robert J Hance; Carmela Ganoza; Patricia Defechereux; Brian Postle; Furong Wang; J Jeff McConnell; Jia-Hua Zheng; Jeanny Lee; James F Rooney; Howard S Jaffe; Ana I Martinez; David N Burns; David V Glidden Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Julie B Dumond; Rosa F Yeh; Kristine B Patterson; Amanda H Corbett; Byung Hwa Jung; Naser L Rezk; Arlene S Bridges; Paul W Stewart; Myron S Cohen; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-09-12 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Trevor Hawkins; Wenoah Veikley; Robert L St Claire; Bill Guyer; Nicole Clark; Brian P Kearney Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Salim S Abdool Karim; Barbra A Richardson; Gita Ramjee; Irving F Hoffman; Zvavahera M Chirenje; Taha Taha; Muzala Kapina; Lisa Maslankowski; Anne Coletti; Albert Profy; Thomas R Moench; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Benoît Mâsse; Sharon L Hillier; Lydia Soto-Torres Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Sheena McCormack; Gita Ramjee; Anatoli Kamali; Helen Rees; Angela M Crook; Mitzy Gafos; Ute Jentsch; Robert Pool; Maureen Chisembele; Saidi Kapiga; Richard Mutemwa; Andrew Vallely; Thesla Palanee; Yuki Sookrajh; Charles J Lacey; Janet Darbyshire; Heiner Grosskurth; Albert Profy; Andrew Nunn; Richard Hayes; Jonathan Weber Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Pamela M Murnane; Connie Celum; Nelly Mugo; James D Campbell; Deborah Donnell; Elizabeth Bukusi; Andrew Mujugira; Jordan Tappero; Erin M Kahle; Katherine K Thomas; Jared M Baeten Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-08-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Hiwot Hiruy; Edward J Fuchs; Mark A Marzinke; Rahul P Bakshi; Jennifer C Breakey; Wutyi S Aung; Madhuri Manohar; Chen Yue; Brian S Caffo; Yong Du; Kaleab Z Abebe; Hans M L Spiegel; Lisa C Rohan; Ian McGowan; Craig W Hendrix Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Nicolette A Louissaint; Ying-Jun Cao; Paul L Skipper; Rosa G Liberman; Steven R Tannenbaum; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Jean R Anderson; Stephanie Everts; Rahul Bakshi; Edward J Fuchs; Craig W Hendrix Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Kerry A Thomson; Jared M Baeten; Nelly R Mugo; Linda-Gail Bekker; Connie L Celum; Renee Heffron Journal: Curr Opin HIV AIDS Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.283
Authors: Linda-Gail Bekker; Surita Roux; Elaine Sebastien; Ntando Yola; K Rivet Amico; James P Hughes; Mark A Marzinke; Craig W Hendrix; Peter L Anderson; Vanessa Elharrar; Michael Stirratt; James F Rooney; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Susan H Eshleman; Laura McKinstry; Maoji Li; Bonnie J Dye; Robert M Grant Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Julia L Marcus; David V Glidden; Vanessa McMahan; Javier R Lama; Kenneth H Mayer; Albert Y Liu; Orlando Montoya-Herrera; Martin Casapia; Brenda Hoagland; Robert M Grant Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Antoinette G Nelson; Xiaoping Zhang; Usha Ganapathi; Zoltan Szekely; Charles W Flexner; Andrew Owen; Patrick J Sinko Journal: J Control Release Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Myron S Cohen; M Kumi Smith; Kathryn E Muessig; Timothy B Hallett; Kimberly A Powers; Angela D Kashuba Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 79.321