Literature DB >> 22964062

A sensitivity analysis of a personalized pulse wave propagation model for arteriovenous fistula surgery. Part A: Identification of most influential model parameters.

W Huberts1, C de Jonge, W P M van der Linden, M A Inda, J H M Tordoir, F N van de Vosse, E M H Bosboom.   

Abstract

Previously, a pulse wave propagation model was developed that has potential in supporting decision-making in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) surgery for hemodialysis. To adapt the wave propagation model to personalized conditions, patient-specific input parameters should be available. In clinics, the number of measurable input parameters is limited which results in sparse datasets. In addition, patient data are compromised with uncertainty. These uncertain and incomplete input datasets will result in model output uncertainties. By means of a sensitivity analysis the propagation of input uncertainties into output uncertainty can be studied which can give directions for input measurement improvement. In this study, a computational framework has been developed to perform such a sensitivity analysis with a variance-based method and Monte Carlo simulations. The framework was used to determine the influential parameters of our pulse wave propagation model applied to AVF surgery, with respect to parameter prioritization and parameter fixing. With this we were able to determine the model parameters that have the largest influence on the predicted mean brachial flow and systolic radial artery pressure after AVF surgery. Of all 73 parameters 51 could be fixed within their measurement uncertainty interval without significantly influencing the output, while 16 parameters importantly influence the output uncertainty. Measurement accuracy improvement should thus focus on these 16 influential parameters. The most rewarding are measurement improvements of the following parameters: the mean aortic flow, the aortic windkessel resistance, the parameters associated with the smallest arterial or venous diameters of the AVF in- and outflow tract and the radial artery windkessel compliance.
Copyright © 2012 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22964062     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  6 in total

1.  Assisting vascular access surgery planning for hemodialysis by using MR, image segmentation techniques, and computer simulations.

Authors:  M A G Merkx; A S Bode; W Huberts; J Oliván Bescós; J H M Tordoir; M Breeuwer; F N van de Vosse; E M H Bosboom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Determining the impacts of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on cerebral oxygenation using a one-dimensional blood flow simulator.

Authors:  Bradley Feiger; Ajar Kochar; John Gounley; Desiree Bonadonna; Mani Daneshmand; Amanda Randles
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Inverse problems in reduced order models of cardiovascular haemodynamics: aspects of data assimilation and heart rate variability.

Authors:  Sanjay Pant; Chiara Corsini; Catriona Baker; Tain-Yen Hsia; Giancarlo Pennati; Irene E Vignon-Clementel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Computational assessment of hemodynamics-based diagnostic tools using a database of virtual subjects: Application to three case studies.

Authors:  Marie Willemet; Samuel Vennin; Jordi Alastruey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Towards patient-specific modeling of coronary hemodynamics in healthy and diseased state.

Authors:  Arjen van der Horst; Frits L Boogaard; Marcel van't Veer; Marcel C M Rutten; Nico H J Pijls; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Uncertainty and variability in computational and mathematical models of cardiac physiology.

Authors:  Gary R Mirams; Pras Pathmanathan; Richard A Gray; Peter Challenor; Richard H Clayton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.182

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.