Literature DB >> 22964056

Haptic perception of wetness.

Wouter M Bergmann Tiest1, N Dolfine Kosters, Astrid M L Kappers, Hein A M Daanen.   

Abstract

In daily life, people interact with textiles of different degrees of wetness, but little is known about the mechanics of wetness perception. This paper describes an experiment with six conditions regarding haptic discrimination of the wetness of fabrics. Three materials were used: cotton wool, sponge-structured viscose and thin viscose. Two ways of touching were investigated: static touching, in which only thermal cues were available, and dynamic touching, in which additional mechanical cues were available. For dynamic touching, average Weber fractions for discrimination were around 0.3, whereas for static touching, they ranged from 0.34 to 0.63. The results show that people can make use of the additional mechanical cues to significantly improve their discrimination performance. There was no significant difference between Weber fractions for the three materials, showing that wetness can be judged as a separate perceptual quantity, independent of the material.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22964056     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  8 in total

1.  Tactile cues significantly modulate the perception of sweat-induced skin wetness independently of the level of physical skin wetness.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; Damien Fournet; Simon Hodder; George Havenith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The biology of skin wetness perception and its implications in manual function and for reproducing complex somatosensory signals in neuroprosthetics.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; Rochelle Ackerley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human-Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics.

Authors:  Wenzheng Heng; Samuel Solomon; Wei Gao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 32.086

4.  Skin wetness sensitivity across body sites commonly affected by pain in people with migraine.

Authors:  Alex Buoite Stella; Davide Filingeri; Gabriele Garascia; Laura D'Acunto; Giovanni Furlanis; Antonio Granato; Paolo Manganotti
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.311

Review 5.  Human skin wetness perception: psychophysical and neurophysiological bases.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; George Havenith
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2015-02-03

6.  Subjective wet perception assessment of fabrics with different drying time.

Authors:  Kam-Hong Chau; Ka-Po Maggie Tang; Chi-Wai Kan
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Assessment of Stickiness with Pressure Distribution Sensor Using Offset Magnetic Force.

Authors:  Takayuki Kameoka; Akifumi Takahashi; Vibol Yem; Hiroyuki Kajimoto; Kohei Matsumori; Naoki Saito; Naomi Arakawa
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Skin wetness detection thresholds and wetness magnitude estimations of the human index fingerpad and their modulation by moisture temperature.

Authors:  Charlotte Merrick; Rodrigo Rosati; Davide Filingeri
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.