Literature DB >> 22964053

Increasing set size breaks down sequential congruency: evidence for an associative locus of cognitive control.

Chris Blais1, Tom Verguts.   

Abstract

In recent years, a number of studies have revealed that cognitive control is strongly context-dependent (e.g., Crump et al., 2006). Inspired by this, computational models have been formulated based on the idea that cognitive control processes are based on associative learning (Blais et al., 2007; Verguts & Notebaert, 2008). Here, we test a natural consequence of this idea, namely, that sequential congruency effects (Gratton et al., 1992) should gradually decrease with an increasing number of task-relevant features (e.g., stimuli). The effect is empirically observed and simulated in a computational model. Implications of our findings are discussed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22964053     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  11 in total

1.  Implicitly strengthened task-irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulate cognitive control: Evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tiansheng Xia; Hui Li; Ling Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.

Authors:  Miriam Tomat; Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Michael Sprengel; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-06

3.  Distinct but correlated latent factors support the regulation of learned conflict-control and task-switching.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Rick H Hoyle; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.746

Review 4.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to context-control learning.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Distractor probabilities modulate flanker task performance.

Authors:  Eli Bulger; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Abigail L Noyce
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Congruency sequence effects are driven by previous-trial congruency, not previous-trial response conflict.

Authors:  Daniel H Weissman; Joshua Carp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-04

7.  Resolved but not forgotten: Stroop conflict dredges up the past.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-20

8.  Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-06

9.  Proportion congruency effects: instructions may be enough.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov; Yoella Bereby-Meyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-06

10.  Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.