Literature DB >> 22963352

Predicting doubly labeled water energy expenditure from ambulatory activity.

Catrine Tudor-Locke1, Corby K Martin, Meghan M Brashear, Jennifer C Rood, Peter T Katzmarzyk, William D Johnson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential for using accelerometer-determined ambulatory activity indicators (steps per day and cadence) to predict total energy expenditure (TEE) and physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) derived from doubly labeled water (DLW). Twenty men and 34 women (20-36 years of age) provided complete anthropometric, accelerometer, resting metabolic rate (RMR), and DLW data. TEE and PAEE were determined for the same week that accelerometers were worn during waking hours. Accelerometer data included mean steps per day, peak 30-min cadence (average steps per minute for the highest 30 min of the day), and time spent in each incremental cadence band: 0 (nonmovement), 1-19 (incidental movement), 20-39 (sporadic movement), 40-59 (purposeful steps), 60-79 (slow walking), 80-99 (medium walking), 100-119 (brisk walking), and 120+ steps·min(-1) (indicative of all faster ambulatory activities). Regression analyses were employed to develop sex-specific equations for predicting TEE and PAEE. The final model predicting TEE included body weight, steps per day, and time in incremental cadence bands and explained 79% (men) and 65% (women) of the variability. The final model predicting PAEE included peak 30-min cadence, steps per day, and time in cadence bands and explained 76% (men) and 46% (women) of the variability. Time in cadence bands alone explained 39%-73% of the variability in TEE and 30%-63% of the variability in PAEE. Prediction models were stronger for men than for women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22963352     DOI: 10.1139/h2012-097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  5 in total

Review 1.  Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing.

Authors:  N V Dhurandhar; D Schoeller; A W Brown; S B Heymsfield; D Thomas; T I A Sørensen; J R Speakman; M Jeansonne; D B Allison
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 2.  Prediction of activity-related energy expenditure using accelerometer-derived physical activity under free-living conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Jeran; A Steinbrecher; T Pischon
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Physical activity, mental health, and weight gain in a longitudinal observational cohort of nonobese young adults.

Authors:  Amanda E Staiano; Arwen M Marker; Corby K Martin; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 4.  How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Ho Han; Elroy J Aguiar; Tiago V Barreira; John M Schuna; Minsoo Kang; David A Rowe
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Prediction of activity-related energy expenditure under free-living conditions using accelerometer-derived physical activity.

Authors:  Stephanie Jeran; Astrid Steinbrecher; Verena Haas; Anja Mähler; Michael Boschmann; Klaas R Westerterp; Boris A Brühmann; Karen Steindorf; Tobias Pischon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.