Literature DB >> 22963205

Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. in rainwater tank samples: comparison of culture-based methods and 23S rRNA gene quantitative PCR assays.

W Ahmed1, K Richardson, J P S Sidhu, S Toze.   

Abstract

In this study, culture-based methods and quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays were compared with each other for the measurement of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. in water samples collected from rainwater tanks in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Among the 50 rainwater tank samples tested, 26 (52%) and 46 (92%) samples yielded E. coli numbers as measured by EPA Method 1603 and E. coli 23S rRNA gene qPCR assay, respectively. Similarly, 49 (98%) and 47 (94%) samples yielded Enterococcus spp. numbers as measured by EPA Method 1600 and Enterococcus spp. 23S rRNA gene qPCR assay, respectively. The mean E. coli (2.49 ± 0.85) log(10) and Enterococcus spp. (2.72 ± 0.32) log(10) numbers as measured by qPCR assays were significantly (P < 0001) different than E. coli (0.91 ± 0.80) log(10) and Enterococcus spp. (1.86 ± 0.60) log(10) numbers as measured by culture-based method. Weak but significant correlations were observed between both EPA Method 1603 and the E. coli qPCR assay (r = 0.47, P = 0.0009), and EPA Method 1600 and the Enterococcus spp. qPCR assay (r = 0.42, P = 0.002). Good qualitative agreement was found between the culture-based method and the Enterococcus spp. qPCR assay in terms of detecting fecal pollution in water samples from the studied rainwater tanks. More research studies, however, are needed to shed some light on the discrepancies associated with the culture-based methods and qPCR assays for measuring fecal indicator bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22963205     DOI: 10.1021/es302222b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Microbes in Beach Sands: Integrating Environment, Ecology and Public Health.

Authors:  Richard Whitman; Valerie J Harwood; Thomas A Edge; Meredith Nevers; Muruleedhara Byappanahalli; Kannappan Vijayavel; João Brandão; Michael J Sadowsky; Elizabeth Wheeler Alm; Allan Crowe; Donna Ferguson; Zhongfu Ge; Elizabeth Halliday; Julie Kinzelman; Greg Kleinheinz; Kasia Przybyla-Kelly; Christopher Staley; Zachery Staley; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 8.044

2.  Distributions of Fecal Markers in Wastewater from Different Climatic Zones for Human Fecal Pollution Tracking in Australian Surface Waters.

Authors:  W Ahmed; J P S Sidhu; K Smith; D J Beale; P Gyawali; S Toze
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  PCR-based detection of pathogens in improved water sources: a scoping review protocol of the evidence in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Shibabaw Tadesse Gemeda; Negasa Eshete Soboksa; Yonatal Mesfin Tefera; Adey Feleke Desta; Sirak Robele Gari
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Microbial quality and phylogenetic diversity of fresh rainwater and tropical freshwater reservoir.

Authors:  Rajni Kaushik; Rajasekhar Balasubramanian; Hugh Dunstan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Persistence of Multi-Drug Resistance Plasmids in Sterile Water under Very Low Concentrations of Tetracycline.

Authors:  Thi Lan Thanh Bien; Yuki Sato-Takabe; Mitsuko Ogo; Masaru Usui; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.