Literature DB >> 22961609

Detection of retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy: comparative evaluation of 7-field digital color photography versus red-free photography.

Pradeep Venkatesh1, Reetika Sharma, Nagender Vashist, Rajpal Vohra, Satpal Garg.   

Abstract

Red-free light allows better detection of vascular lesions as this wavelength is absorbed by hemoglobin; however, the current gold standard for the detection and grading of diabetic retinopathy remains 7-field color fundus photography. The goal of this study was to compare the ability of 7-field fundus photography using red-free light to detect retinopathy lesions with corresponding images captured using standard 7-field color photography. Non-stereoscopic standard 7-field 30° digital color fundus photography and 7-field 30° digital red-free fundus photography were performed in 200 eyes of 103 patients with various grades of diabetic retinopathy ranging from mild to moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The color images (n = 1,400) were studied with corresponding red-free images (n = 1,400) by one retina consultant (PV) and two senior residents training in retina. The various retinal lesions [microaneurysms, hemorrhages, hard exudates, soft exudates, intra-retinal microvascular anomalies (IRMA), neovascularization of the retina elsewhere (NVE), and neovascularization of the disc (NVD)] detected by all three observers in each of the photographs were noted followed by determination of agreement scores using κ values (range 0-1). Kappa coefficient was categorized as poor (≤0), slight (0.01-0.20), fair (0.2 -0.40), moderate (0.41-0.60), substantial (0.61-0.80), and almost perfect (0.81-1). The number of lesions detected by red-free images alone was higher for all observers and all abnormalities except hard exudates. Detection of IRMA was especially higher for all observers with red-free images. Between image pairs, there was substantial agreement for detection of hard exudates (average κ = 0.62, range 0.60-0.65) and moderate agreement for detection of hemorrhages (average κ = 0.52, range 0.45-0.58), soft exudates (average κ = 0.51, range 0.42-0.61), NVE (average κ = 0.47, range 0.39-0.53), and NVD (average κ = 0.51, range 0.45-0.54). Fair agreement was noted for detection of microaneurysms (average κ = 0.29, range 0.20-0.39) and IRMA (average κ = 0.23, range 0.23-0.24). Inter-observer agreement with color images was substantial for hemorrhages (average κ = 0.72), soft exudates (average κ = 0.65), and NVD (average κ = 0.65); moderate for microaneurysms (average κ = 0.42), NVE (average κ = 0.44), and hard exudates (average κ = 0.59) and fair for IRMA (average κ = 0.21). Inter-observer agreement with red-free images was substantial for hard exudates (average κ = 0.63) and moderate for detection of hemorrhages (average κ = 0.56), SE (average κ = 0.60), IRMA (average κ = 0.50), NVE (average κ = 0.44), and NVD (average κ = 0.45). Digital red-free photography has a higher level of detection ability for all retinal lesions of diabetic retinopathy. More advanced grades of retinopathy are likely to be detected earlier with red-free imaging because of its better ability to detect IRMA, NVE, and NVD. Red-free monochromatic imaging of the retina is a more effective and less costly alternative for detection of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22961609     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-012-9620-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  12 in total

1.  Monochromatic ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography. The normal fundus.

Authors:  F C Delori; E S Gragoudas; R Francisco; R C Pruett
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-05

2.  Detection of diabetic retinopathy: a comparison between red-free digital images and colour transparencies.

Authors:  Gunvor von Wendt; Paula Summanen; Kerstin Hallnäs; Peep Algvere; Kauko Heikkilä; Stefan Seregard
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Identification of individual microaneurysms: a comparison between fluorescein angiograms and red-free and colour photographs.

Authors:  T Hellstedt; E Vesti; I Immonen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs--an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Non-stereo fundus photography as a screening procedure for diabetic retinopathy among patients with type II diabetes. Compared with 60D enhanced slit-lamp examination.

Authors:  H Kalm; R Egertsen; G Blohmé
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1989-10

8.  Global burden of diabetes, 1995-2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections.

Authors:  H King; R E Aubert; W H Herman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years.

Authors:  R Klein; B E Klein; S E Moss; M D Davis; D L DeMets
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-04

10.  A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  J A Olson; F M Strachan; J H Hipwell; K A Goatman; K C McHardy; J V Forrester; P F Sharp
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.359

View more
  3 in total

1.  Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening and Monitoring Using Retinal Fundus Image Analysis.

Authors:  Malavika Bhaskaranand; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Sandeep Bhat; Jorge Cuadros; Muneeswar Gupta Nittala; SriniVas Sadda; Kaushal Solanki
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-02-16

2.  Improving Consensus Scoring of Crowdsourced Data Using the Rasch Model: Development and Refinement of a Diagnostic Instrument.

Authors:  Christopher John Brady; Lucy Iluka Mudie; Xueyang Wang; Eliseo Guallar; David Steven Friedman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Commentary: Expanding the horizons of red-free examination.

Authors:  Tanvi Soni; Piyush Kohli
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.969

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.