Literature DB >> 22961371

Coupling in goshawk and grouse population dynamics in Finland.

Risto Tornberg1, Andreas Lindén, Patrik Byholm, Esa Ranta, Jari Valkama, Pekka Helle, Harto Lindén.   

Abstract

Different prey species can vary in their significance to a particular predator. In the simplest case, the total available density or biomass of a guild of several prey species might be most relevant to the predator, but behavioural and ecological traits of different prey species can alter the picture. We studied the population dynamics of a predator-prey setting in Finland by fitting first-order log-linear vector autoregressive models to long-term count data from active breeding sites of the northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis; 1986-2009), and to three of its main prey species (1983-2010): hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia), black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) and capercaillie (T. urogallus), which belong to the same forest grouse guild and show synchronous fluctuations. Our focus was on modelling the relative significance of prey species and estimating the tightness of predator-prey coupling in order to explain the observed population dynamics, simultaneously accounting for effects of density dependence, winter severity and spatial correlation. We established nine competing candidate models, where different combinations of grouse species affect goshawk dynamics with lags of 1-3 years. Effects of goshawk on grouse were investigated using one model for each grouse species. The most parsimonious model for goshawk indicated separate density effects of hazel grouse and black grouse, and different effects with lags of 1 and 3 years. Capercaillie showed no effects on goshawk populations, while the effect of goshawk on grouse was clearly negative only in capercaillie. Winter severity had significant adverse effects on goshawk and hazel grouse populations. In combination, large-scale goshawk-grouse population dynamics are coupled, but there are no clear mutual effects for any of the individual guild members. In a broader context, our study suggests that pooling data on closely related, synchronously fluctuating prey species can result in the loss of relevant information, rather than increased model parsimony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22961371     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2448-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  The Logic and Realism of the Hypothesis of Exploitation Ecosystems.

Authors:  Lauri Oksanen; Tarja Oksanen
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Factors Limiting Higher Vertebrate Populations.

Authors:  P L Errington
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Role of predation in short-term population fluctuations of some birds and mammals in Fennoscandia.

Authors:  P Angelstam; E Lindström; P Widén
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Interactions between habitat heterogeneity and food affect reproductive output in a top predator.

Authors:  Patrik Byholm; Ari Nikula; Jussi Kentta; Jukka-Pekka Taivalmäki
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Territory occupancy rate of goshawk and gyrfalcon: no evidence of delayed numerical response to grouse numbers.

Authors:  Vidar Selås; John Atle Kålås
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Habitat Effects on the Breeding Performance of Three Forest-Dwelling Hawks.

Authors:  Heidi Björklund; Jari Valkama; Erkki Tomppo; Toni Laaksonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.