Literature DB >> 2296127

Critical limits for urgent clinician notification at US medical centers.

G J Kost1.   

Abstract

A national survey determined critical limits used by trauma and medical centers in the United States. Mean low and high critical limits for the most frequently listed tests were the following values: glucose, 2.6 and 26.9 mmol/L; potassium, 2.8 and 6.2 mmol/L; calcium, 1.65 and 3.22 mmol/L; sodium, 120 and 158 mmol/L; hematocrit, 0.18 and 0.61; hemoglobin, 66 and 199 g/L; platelets, 37 x 10(9)/L and 910 X 10(9)/L; and white blood cell count, 2.0 X 10(9)/L and 37.0 X 10(9)/L. The high critical limit for prothrombin time was 27 seconds. Critical limits for PCO2 were 19 and 67 mm Hg; and for pH, 7.21 and 7.59. The low critical limit for PO2 was 43 mm Hg; no high critical limit was listed. The noncritical span for free calcium was 0.80 mmol/L. Important qualitative critical results included the presence of blasts on the blood smear, a Gram's stain or culture from blood or cerebrospinal fluid with positive results, and an elevated white blood cell count in the cerebrospinal fluid. A product of 15 years of collective medical judgment, these data should help physicians improve the quality and efficiency of acute patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2296127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  15 in total

1.  Design and implementation of a real-time clinical alerting system for intensive care unit.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ting Chen; Wun-Chun Ma; Der Ming Liou
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

2.  Advanced alerting features: displaying new relevant data and retracting alerts.

Authors:  G J Kuperman; F L Hiltz; J M Teich
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

3.  Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G J Kuperman; J M Teich; M J Tanasijevic; N Ma'Luf; E Rittenberg; A Jha; J Fiskio; J Winkelman; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Pathology consultation on reporting of critical values.

Authors:  Jonathan R Genzen; Christopher A Tormey
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5. 

Authors:  Lothar Thomas
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2003-04-03

6.  How promptly are inpatients treated for critical laboratory results?

Authors:  G J Kuperman; D Boyle; A Jha; E Rittenberg; N Ma'Luf; M J Tanasijevic; J M Teich; J Winkelman; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanne Callen; Andrew Georgiou; Julie Li; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Heterogeneity of publicly accessible online critical values for therapeutic drugs.

Authors:  Colt M McClain; Richard Owings; Joshua A Bornhorst
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-12-26

9.  Effect of different pre-analytical conditions on plasma lactate concentration.

Authors:  Ivana Rako; Ana Mlinaric; Monika Dozelencic; Gordana Fressl Juros; Dunja Rogic
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 2.313

10.  Critical Value Reporting in Transfusion Medicine: A Survey of Communication Practices in US Facilities.

Authors:  Erika M Reese; Randin C Nelson; Willy A Flegel; Karen M Byrne; Garrett S Booth
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.