Literature DB >> 22961212

Cytoskeletal stiffness, friction, and fluidity of cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential.

Mark F Coughlin1, Diane R Bielenberg, Guillaume Lenormand, Marina Marinkovic, Carol G Waghorne, Bruce R Zetter, Jeffrey J Fredberg.   

Abstract

We quantified mechanical properties of cancer cells differing in metastatic potential. These cells included normal and H-ras-transformed NIH3T3 fibroblast cells, normal and oncoprotein-overexpressing MCF10A breast cancer cells, and weakly and strongly metastatic cancer cell line pairs originating from human cancers of the skin (A375P and A375SM cells), kidney (SN12C and SN12PM6 cells), prostate (PC3M and PC3MLN4 cells), and bladder (253J and 253JB5 cells). Using magnetic twisting cytometry, cytoskeletal stiffness (g') and internal friction (g″) were measured over a wide frequency range. The dependencies of g' and g″ upon frequency were used to determine the power law exponent x which is a direct measure of cytoskeletal fluidity and quantifies where the cytoskeleton resides along the spectrum of solid-like (x = 1) to fluid-like (x = 2) states. Cytoskeletal fluidity x increased following transformation by H-ras oncogene expression in NIH3T3 cells, overexpression of ErbB2 and 14-3-3-ζ in MCF10A cells, and implantation and growth of PC3M and 253J cells in the prostate and bladder, respectively. Each of these perturbations that had previously been shown to enhance cancer cell motility and invasion are shown here to shift the cytoskeleton towards a more fluid-like state. In contrast, strongly metastatic A375SM and SN12PM6 cells that disseminate by lodging in the microcirculation of peripheral organs had smaller x than did their weakly metastatic cell line pairs A375P and SN12C, respectively. Thus, enhanced hematological dissemination was associated with decreased x and a shift towards a more solid-like cytoskeleton. Taken together, these results are consistent with the notion that adaptations known to enhance metastatic ability in cancer cell lines define a spectrum of fluid-like versus solid-like states, and the position of the cancer cell within this spectrum may be a determinant of cancer progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22961212      PMCID: PMC3871859          DOI: 10.1007/s10585-012-9531-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis        ISSN: 0262-0898            Impact factor:   5.150


  83 in total

1.  Cancer cell stiffness: integrated roles of three-dimensional matrix stiffness and transforming potential.

Authors:  Erin L Baker; Jing Lu; Dihua Yu; Roger T Bonnecaze; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  High throughput cell nanomechanics with mechanical imaging interferometry.

Authors:  Jason Reed; Matthew Frank; Joshua J Troke; Joanna Schmit; Sen Han; Michael A Teitell; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.874

3.  A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potential?

Authors:  Eric M Darling; Stefan Zauscher; Joel A Block; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Power laws in microrheology experiments on living cells: Comparative analysis and modeling.

Authors:  Martial Balland; Nicolas Desprat; Delphine Icard; Sophie Féréol; Atef Asnacios; Julien Browaeys; Sylvie Hénon; François Gallet
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-08-09

5.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Q S Li; G Y H Lee; C N Ong; C T Lim
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  N Wang; J P Butler; D E Ingber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Expression of H-ras correlates with metastatic potential: evidence for direct regulation of the metastatic phenotype in 10T1/2 and NIH 3T3 cells.

Authors:  S E Egan; G A McClarty; L Jarolim; J A Wright; I Spiro; G Hager; A H Greenberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Mechanics of stimulated neutrophils: cell stiffening induces retention in capillaries.

Authors:  G S Worthen; B Schwab; E L Elson; G P Downey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Isolation and characterization of metastatic variants from human transitional cell carcinoma passaged by orthotopic implantation in athymic nude mice.

Authors:  C P Dinney; R Fishbeck; R K Singh; B Eve; S Pathak; N Brown; B Xie; D Fan; C D Bucana; I J Fidler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah E Cross; Yu-Sheng Jin; Jianyu Rao; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12-02       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  35 in total

1.  Mechanical fluidity of fully suspended biological cells.

Authors:  John M Maloney; Eric Lehnhardt; Alexandra F Long; Krystyn J Van Vliet
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Cell trapping in Y-junction microchannels: A numerical study of the bifurcation angle effect in inertial microfluidics.

Authors:  Scott J Hymel; Hongzhi Lan; Hideki Fujioka; Damir B Khismatullin
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.521

3.  Multiparametric Biomechanical and Biochemical Phenotypic Profiling of Single Cancer Cells Using an Elasticity Microcytometer.

Authors:  Shuhuan Hu; Guangyu Liu; Weiqiang Chen; Xiang Li; Wei Lu; Raymond H W Lam; Jianping Fu
Journal:  Small       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 13.281

4.  Elongation Index as a Sensitive Measure of Cell Deformation in High-Throughput Microfluidic Systems.

Authors:  Scott J Hymel; Hongzhi Lan; Damir B Khismatullin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A novel cell-stiffness-fingerprinting analysis by scanning atomic force microscopy: comparison of fibroblasts and diverse cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Hans Zoellner; Navid Paknejad; Katia Manova; Malcolm A S Moore
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.304

6.  Biophysical isolation and identification of circulating tumor cells.

Authors:  James Che; Victor Yu; Edward B Garon; Jonathan W Goldman; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 7.  Glass-like dynamics in the cell and in cellular collectives.

Authors:  Monirosadat Sadati; Amir Nourhani; Jeffrey J Fredberg; Nader Taheri Qazvini
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2014-01-15

Review 8.  Cellular Biomechanics in Drug Screening and Evaluation: Mechanopharmacology.

Authors:  Ramaswamy Krishnan; Jin-Ah Park; Chun Y Seow; Peter V-S Lee; Alastair G Stewart
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.819

9.  Deformability-based cell selection with downstream immunofluorescence analysis.

Authors:  Josephine Shaw Bagnall; Sangwon Byun; David T Miyamoto; Joon Ho Kang; Shyamala Maheswaran; Shannon L Stott; Mehmet Toner; Scott R Manalis
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Oncogenes induce a vimentin filament collapse mediated by HDAC6 that is linked to cell stiffness.

Authors:  Li-Sophie Z Rathje; Niklas Nordgren; Torbjörn Pettersson; Daniel Rönnlund; Jerker Widengren; Pontus Aspenström; Annica K B Gad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.