| Literature DB >> 22961081 |
Clinton R Bruce1, Steve Risis, Joanne R Babb, Christine Yang, Greg M Kowalski, Ahrathy Selathurai, Robert S Lee-Young, Jacquelyn M Weir, Kazuaki Yoshioka, Yoh Takuwa, Peter J Meikle, Stuart M Pitson, Mark A Febbraio.
Abstract
The sphingolipids sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and ceramide are important bioactive lipids with many cellular effects. Intracellular ceramide accumulation causes insulin resistance, but sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1) prevents ceramide accumulation, in part, by promoting its metabolism into S1P. Despite this, the role of SphK1 in regulating insulin action has been largely overlooked. Transgenic (Tg) mice that overexpress SphK1 were fed a standard chow or high-fat diet (HFD) for 6 weeks before undergoing several metabolic analyses. SphK1 Tg mice fed an HFD displayed increased SphK activity in skeletal muscle, which was associated with an attenuated intramuscular ceramide accumulation compared with wild-type (WT) littermates. This was associated with a concomitant reduction in the phosphorylation of c-jun amino-terminal kinase, a serine threonine kinase associated with insulin resistance. Accordingly, skeletal muscle and whole-body insulin sensitivity were improved in SphK1 Tg, compared with WT mice, when fed an HFD. We have identified that the enzyme SphK1 is an important regulator of lipid partitioning and insulin action in skeletal muscle under conditions of increased lipid supply.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22961081 PMCID: PMC3501880 DOI: 10.2337/db12-0029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes ISSN: 0012-1797 Impact factor: 9.461
Characteristics of chow- and HFD-fed WT and SphK1 Tg mice
FIG. 1.Phenotypic data from chow-fed WT and SphK1 Tg mice. A: SphK1 activity in muscle, WAT, and liver (WT n = 8; SphK1 Tg n = 5). B: Muscle S1P content (WT n = 7; SphK1 Tg n = 6). C: Muscle sphingosine content (WT n = 7; SphK1 Tg n = 6). D: Ceramide levels in quadriceps (Quad) (WT n = 7; SphK1 Tg n = 5), soleus (WT n = 7; SphK1 Tg n = 6), WAT (WT n = 10; SphK1 Tg n = 10), and liver (WT n = 8; SphK1 Tg n = 5). E: Glucose tolerance curves (WT n = 15; SphK1 Tg n = 10). Data are mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01 vs. WT.
FIG. 2.Muscle lipid levels in chow-fed and HFD-fed WT and SphK1 Tg mice. A: Ceramide levels (chow WT n = 7; chow SphK1 Tg n = 5; HFD WT n = 15; HFD SphK1 Tg n = 15). B: Fold change in total ceramide content (data expressed relative to chow group of the same genotype; n = 15). C: S1P content in muscle of HFD-fed WT (n = 8) and SphK1 Tg mice (n = 7). D: Muscle sphingosine content (WT n = 8; SphK1 Tg n = 7). E: Muscle sphingomyelin levels (chow WT n = 5; chow SphK1 Tg n = 5; HFD WT n = 7; HFD SphK1 Tg n = 7). F: Muscle DAG profile (chow WT n = 5; chow SphK1 Tg n = 5; HFD WT n = 7; HFD SphK1 Tg n = 7). G: Muscle TAG content (chow WT n = 6; chow SphK1 Tg n = 7; HFD WT n = 10; HFD SphK1 Tg n = 8). H: PE levels (chow WT n = 5; chow SphK1 Tg n = 5; HFD WT n = 7; HFD SphK1 Tg n = 7). I: PC levels (chow WT n = 5; chow SphK1 Tg n = 5; HFD WT n = 7; HFD SphK1 Tg n = 7). Data are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. wild type. †Main effect for genotype, P < 0.05. ‡Main effect for diet, P < 0.05.
FIG. 3.Glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity is enhanced in SphK1 Tg mice fed an HFD. A: Blood glucose levels during a glucose tolerance test in HFD-fed WT (n = 22) and SphK1 Tg (n = 17) mice. B: Blood glucose levels during the hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp (WT n = 5; SphK1 Tg n = 6). C: Glucose infusion rate (WT n = 5; SphK1 Tg n = 6). D: Basal rates of endogenous glucose Ra (EndoRa) (WT n = 5; SphK1 Tg n = 6). E: Insulin-stimulated glucose Rd (WT n = 5; SphK1 Tg n = 6). F: Percent suppression of EndoRa (WT n = 5; SphK1 Tg n = 6). G: Tissue glucose uptake (WT n = 5; SphK1 Tg n = 6). H: Immunoblot of pAkt serine (ser) 473 in basal and insulin-stimulated EDL muscles ex vivo (n = 8 for each group). I: Quantification of pAkt ser473 (n = 8 for each group). J: Fold change in pAkt ser473 under insulin-stimulated conditions. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 17–22 for the glucose tolerance data (n = 8 for each group). *P < 0.05 vs. WT; **P < 0.01 vs. WT. TA, tibialis anterior; Quad, quadriceps.
FIG. 4.Inflammatory markers in skeletal muscle of WT and SphK1 Tg mice. A: pIKK in muscle from chow- and HFD-fed mice (chow WT n = 7; chow SphK1 Tg n = 5; HFD WT n = 9; HFD SphK1 Tg n = 10). B: pJNK in muscle from chow- and HFD-fed mice (chow WT n = 7; chow SphK1 Tg n = 5; HFD WT n = 9; HFD SphK1 Tg n = 10). C: Ceramide profile of soleus muscles incubated with low (0.5 mmol/L; n = 8 for WT; n = 6 for SphK1 Tg) and high (2.0 mmol/L; n = 10 for WT; n = 8 for SphK1 Tg) palmitate for 6 h. D: pJNK in soleus muscles incubated with low (0.5 mmol/L) and high (2.0 mmol/L) palmitate for 6 h (n = 12 for each group). Data are mean ± SEM. For B and D: *P < 0.05 for specified comparisons. For C: †P < 0.05 main effect for palmitate; ‡P < 0.05 main effect for genotype.