Faith Huang1, Elizabeth Feuille, Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles. 1. Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Icahn Medical Center, 1425 Madison Avenue, Room 11-20, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Utilization reports on immunoglobulin (Ig) use for immunodeficiency in the United States (U.S.) have focused on prescribing practices in hospitals. There have been no large-scale reports on Ig use for immune deficiency in the home. We investigated the use of Ig in 3,187 subjects diagnosed with primary immunodeficiency. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on 4,580 subjects in the U.S. receiving Ig in 2011 was obtained from a major home care provider. Demographics, route, dose, and frequency of Ig use by subjects with ICD-9 coded primary immunodeficiencies were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 4,580 subjects, 3,187 had ICD-9 codes suggesting primary immunodeficiencies; 1,939 (60.8 %) were females and 1,248 (39.2 %) were males, with age ranging from 0 to 95 years. The predominant diagnoses were: common variable immunodeficiency (279.06; n=1,764; 55.3 %), hypogammaglobulinemia (279.00; n=635; 19.9 %), unspecified immunity deficiency (279.3; n=286; 9 %), other selective Ig deficiencies (279.03; n=171; 5.4 %), and agammaglobulinemia (279.04; n=127; 4 %). 54 % of subjects received Ig by the subcutaneous (SC) route, and 46 % by intravenous (IV) route, with more SC use by older subjects. The mean dose prescribed was 483 mg/kg/month, but less Ig was ordered for subjects on SCIg (409 mg/kg/month), as compared to subjects on IVIg (568 mg/kg/month). A highly significant inverse correlation between increasing age and dosage of Ig ordered was found (P= <.0001). CONCLUSION: Analysis of home care use of Ig in primary immune deficiency revealed that the SC route was prescribed more than the IV route, especially for older patients. By either method of administration, less immunoglobulin was prescribed for older subjects.
PURPOSE: Utilization reports on immunoglobulin (Ig) use for immunodeficiency in the United States (U.S.) have focused on prescribing practices in hospitals. There have been no large-scale reports on Ig use for immune deficiency in the home. We investigated the use of Ig in 3,187 subjects diagnosed with primary immunodeficiency. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on 4,580 subjects in the U.S. receiving Ig in 2011 was obtained from a major home care provider. Demographics, route, dose, and frequency of Ig use by subjects with ICD-9 coded primary immunodeficiencies were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 4,580 subjects, 3,187 had ICD-9 codes suggesting primary immunodeficiencies; 1,939 (60.8 %) were females and 1,248 (39.2 %) were males, with age ranging from 0 to 95 years. The predominant diagnoses were: common variable immunodeficiency (279.06; n=1,764; 55.3 %), hypogammaglobulinemia (279.00; n=635; 19.9 %), unspecifiedimmunity deficiency (279.3; n=286; 9 %), other selective Ig deficiencies (279.03; n=171; 5.4 %), and agammaglobulinemia (279.04; n=127; 4 %). 54 % of subjects received Ig by the subcutaneous (SC) route, and 46 % by intravenous (IV) route, with more SC use by older subjects. The mean dose prescribed was 483 mg/kg/month, but less Ig was ordered for subjects on SCIg (409 mg/kg/month), as compared to subjects on IVIg (568 mg/kg/month). A highly significant inverse correlation between increasing age and dosage of Ig ordered was found (P= <.0001). CONCLUSION: Analysis of home care use of Ig in primary immune deficiency revealed that the SC route was prescribed more than the IV route, especially for older patients. By either method of administration, less immunoglobulin was prescribed for older subjects.
Authors: Ann Gardulf; Uwe Nicolay; Oscar Asensio; Ewa Bernatowska; Andreas Böck; Beatriz Costa Carvalho; Carl Granert; Stefan Haag; Dolores Hernández; Peter Kiessling; Jan Kus; Jaune Pons; Tim Niehues; Sigune Schmidt; Ilka Schulze; Michael Borte Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2006-04-26 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: H W Eijkhout; J W van Der Meer; C G Kallenberg; R S Weening; J T van Dissel; L A Sanders; P F Strengers; H Nienhuis; P T Schellekens Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-08-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jordan S Orange; Elham M Hossny; Catherine R Weiler; Mark Ballow; Melvin Berger; Francisco A Bonilla; Rebecca Buckley; Javier Chinen; Yehia El-Gamal; Bruce D Mazer; Robert P Nelson; Dhavalkumar D Patel; Elizabeth Secord; Ricardo U Sorensen; Richard L Wasserman; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 10.793