BACKGROUND: Managing Type 1 diabetes (T1D) during adolescence can be challenging, and there is a need for accessible interventions to help adolescents cope with diabetes-related stress. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare an Internet coping skills training (TEENCOPE) intervention to an Internet educational intervention (Managing Diabetes) for adolescents with T1D. Moderators of program efficacy were evaluated. METHODS: The study was a multisite clinical trial (n = 320) with data collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Data were collected on the primary outcomes of physiologic (A1C) and psychosocial (quality of life) and on the secondary outcomes of behavioral (self-management) and psychosocial (stress, coping self-efficacy, social competence, family conflict) variables consistent with the conceptual framework. Data were analyzed using mixed-model analyses with an intent-to-treat approach. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group treatment effects 6 months postintervention on primary outcomes. The Managing Diabetes youth showed a significant increase in social competence compared to the TEENCOPE youth. There were significant time effects for TEENCOPE (decreased stress and increased coping) and Managing Diabetes (improved diabetes quality of life). DISCUSSION: Youth with T1D transitioning to adolescence may need both structured diabetes education and coping skills to improve health outcomes. There may be a higher potential to reach adolescents with Type 1 diabetes of varying race and ethnicity via Internet interventions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Managing Type 1 diabetes (T1D) during adolescence can be challenging, and there is a need for accessible interventions to help adolescents cope with diabetes-related stress. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare an Internet coping skills training (TEENCOPE) intervention to an Internet educational intervention (Managing Diabetes) for adolescents with T1D. Moderators of program efficacy were evaluated. METHODS: The study was a multisite clinical trial (n = 320) with data collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Data were collected on the primary outcomes of physiologic (A1C) and psychosocial (quality of life) and on the secondary outcomes of behavioral (self-management) and psychosocial (stress, coping self-efficacy, social competence, family conflict) variables consistent with the conceptual framework. Data were analyzed using mixed-model analyses with an intent-to-treat approach. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group treatment effects 6 months postintervention on primary outcomes. The Managing Diabetes youth showed a significant increase in social competence compared to the TEENCOPE youth. There were significant time effects for TEENCOPE (decreased stress and increased coping) and Managing Diabetes (improved diabetes quality of life). DISCUSSION: Youth with T1D transitioning to adolescence may need both structured diabetes education and coping skills to improve health outcomes. There may be a higher potential to reach adolescents with Type 1 diabetes of varying race and ethnicity via Internet interventions.
Authors: Tim Wysocki; Michael A Harris; Lisa M Buckloh; Debbie Mertlich; Amanda S Lochrie; Nelly Mauras; Neil H White Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ariana M Chao; Karl E Minges; Chorong Park; Susan Dumser; Kathryn M Murphy; Margaret Grey; Robin Whittemore Journal: J Pediatr Health Care Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: J J Wong; A Addala; D Naranjo; K K Hood; E Cengiz; M K Ginley; R S Feinn; J A Wagner Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Dixy Rajkumar; Deborah A Ellis; Dana K May; April Carcone; Sylvie Naar-King; Steven Ondersma; Kathleen C Moltz Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2015-09-03
Authors: Robin Whittemore; Lauren Liberti; Sangchoon Jeon; Ariana Chao; Sarah S Jaser; Margaret Grey Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Marisa E Hilliard; Maartje De Wit; Rachel M Wasserman; Ashley M Butler; Meredyth Evans; Jill Weissberg-Benchell; Barbara J Anderson Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 4.866