Literature DB >> 22960470

Fundamental differences in visual search with verbal and pictorial cues.

William H Knapp1, Richard A Abrams.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effects of using informative verbal and pictorial cues on participants' abilities to perform visual search. By providing participants with more time to encode the cues than had been used previously, all three experiments revealed long-lasting pictorially cued search advantages that stabilized over time. Experiments 1 and 3 demonstrated that searching for changing targets with pictorial cues was equivalent to searching for the same target over multiple trials in which target-switching costs would have been minimized. Experiment 3 additionally revealed that earlier evidence of pictorially cued search advantages was not due to inadequately equating the amount of information contained in the cues or uncertainty about when the search display would appear. Together, the data suggest that there are fundamental differences in the ability of participants to engage in visual search when the targets are identified with verbal, as opposed to pictorial, cues even when participants have sufficient time to fully encode the cues. 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22960470     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  3 in total

1.  Visual search and attention in blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata): Associative cuing and sequential priming.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Alan B Bond; Marianna Burks; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Priming and the guidance by visual and categorical templates in visual search.

Authors:  Anna Wilschut; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-24

3.  Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Floor de Groot; Falk Huettig; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.