Literature DB >> 22960256

Visual experience facilitates allocentric spatial representation.

Achille Pasqualotto1, Mary Jane Spiller, Ashok S Jansari, Michael J Proulx.   

Abstract

Representing the position of the objects independently from our own position is a fundamental cognitive ability. Here we investigated whether this ability depends on visual experience. Congenitally blind, late blind and blindfolded sighted participants haptically learnt a room-sized regularly shaped array of objects, and their spatial memory was tested to determine which spatial reference frame was used. Crucially, the use of an object-based reference frame requires representing the regular structure of the array. We found that blindfolded sighted and late blind participants, that is those with visual experience, showed a preferential use of the object-based or 'allocentric' reference frame. On the contrary, congenitally blind participants preferred a self-based, or egocentric, reference frame. This suggests that, due to its developmental effect on the multisensory brain areas involved in spatial cognition, visual experience is necessary to develop a preference for an object-based, allocentric reference frame.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22960256     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  34 in total

1.  Enhanced verbal abilities in the congenitally blind.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Simon Lacey; Careese Stephens; Lotfi B Merabet; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of hand movements on numerical bisection judgments in early blind and sighted individuals.

Authors:  Luca Rinaldi; Tomaso Vecchi; Micaela Fantino; Lotfi B Merabet; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Navigation using sensory substitution in real and virtual mazes.

Authors:  Daniel-Robert Chebat; Shachar Maidenbaum; Amir Amedi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Where am I? Who am I? The Relation Between Spatial Cognition, Social Cognition and Individual Differences in the Built Environment.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; Orlin S Todorov; Amanda Taylor Aiken; Alexandra A de Sousa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11

5.  Effects of Increasing Stimulated Area in Spatiotemporally Congruent Unisensory and Multisensory Conditions.

Authors:  Chiara Martolini; Giulia Cappagli; Sabrina Signorini; Monica Gori
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-09

6.  How well do you see what you hear? The acuity of visual-to-auditory sensory substitution.

Authors:  Alastair Haigh; David J Brown; Peter Meijer; Michael J Proulx
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-18

7.  Virtual environments for the transfer of navigation skills in the blind: a comparison of directed instruction vs. video game based learning approaches.

Authors:  Erin C Connors; Elizabeth R Chrastil; Jaime Sánchez; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The experience of new sensorimotor contingencies by sensory augmentation.

Authors:  Kai Kaspar; Sabine König; Jessika Schwandt; Peter König
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-07-17

9.  Sensory Substitution: The Spatial Updating of Auditory Scenes "Mimics" the Spatial Updating of Visual Scenes.

Authors:  Achille Pasqualotto; Tayfun Esenkaya
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Other ways of seeing: From behavior to neural mechanisms in the online "visual" control of action with sensory substitution.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; James Gwinnutt; Sara Dell'Erba; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Alexandra A de Sousa; David J Brown
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.