OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of individual or group mirror therapy on sensorimotor function, activities of daily living, quality of life and visuospatial neglect in patients with a severe arm paresis after stroke. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centre. SUBJECT: Sixty patients with a severe paresis of the arm within three months after stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Three groups: (1) individual mirror therapy, (2) group mirror therapy and (3) control intervention with restricted view on the affected arm. MAIN MEASURES: Motor function on impairment (Fugl-Meyer Test) and activity level (Action Research Arm Test), independence in activities of daily living (Barthel Index), quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale) and visuospatial neglect (Star Cancellation Test). RESULTS: After five weeks, no significant group differences for motor function were found (P > 0.05). Pre-post differences for the Action Research Arm Test and Fugl-Meyer Test: individual mirror therapy: 3.4 (7.1) and 3.2 (3.8), group mirror therapy: 1.1 (3.1) and 5.1 (10.0) and control therapy: 2.8 (6.7) and 5.2 (8.7). However, a significant effect on visuospatial neglect for patients in the individual mirror therapy compared to control group could be shown (P < 0.01). Furthermore, it was possible to integrate a mirror therapy group intervention for severely affected patients after stroke. CONCLUSION: This study showed no effect on sensorimotor function of the arm, activities of daily living and quality of life of mirror therapy compared to a control intervention after stroke. However, a positive effect on visuospatial neglect was indicated.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of individual or group mirror therapy on sensorimotor function, activities of daily living, quality of life and visuospatial neglect in patients with a severe arm paresis after stroke. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centre. SUBJECT: Sixty patients with a severe paresis of the arm within three months after stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Three groups: (1) individual mirror therapy, (2) group mirror therapy and (3) control intervention with restricted view on the affected arm. MAIN MEASURES: Motor function on impairment (Fugl-Meyer Test) and activity level (Action Research Arm Test), independence in activities of daily living (Barthel Index), quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale) and visuospatial neglect (Star Cancellation Test). RESULTS: After five weeks, no significant group differences for motor function were found (P > 0.05). Pre-post differences for the Action Research Arm Test and Fugl-Meyer Test: individual mirror therapy: 3.4 (7.1) and 3.2 (3.8), group mirror therapy: 1.1 (3.1) and 5.1 (10.0) and control therapy: 2.8 (6.7) and 5.2 (8.7). However, a significant effect on visuospatial neglect for patients in the individual mirror therapy compared to control group could be shown (P < 0.01). Furthermore, it was possible to integrate a mirror therapy group intervention for severely affected patients after stroke. CONCLUSION: This study showed no effect on sensorimotor function of the arm, activities of daily living and quality of life of mirror therapy compared to a control intervention after stroke. However, a positive effect on visuospatial neglect was indicated.
Authors: Gustavo José Luvizutto; Rodrigo Bazan; Gabriel Pereira Braga; Luiz Antônio de Lima Resende; Silméia Garcia Z Bazan; Regina El Dib Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-11-06
Authors: Holm Thieme; Nadine Morkisch; Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Johann Behrens; Bernhard Borgetto; Christian Dohle Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-07-11