Literature DB >> 22960239

A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of intermittent and continuous traction for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Mahmut Alpayci1, Yasemin Ozkan, Levent Yazmalar, Ozcan Hiz, Levent Ediz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of intermittent and continuous traction in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, observer-blind seven-week trial.
SETTING: Hospital-based outpatient practice.
SUBJECTS: Ninety-eight patients with stage 3 knee osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence radiological rating scale.
INTERVENTIONS: All 98 patients were randomly assigned to three treatment groups, for three weeks (weekends excluded). The control group (n=30, mean age: 59.30±8.16) received hot pack and short wave diathermy; the intermittent group (n=30, mean age: 58.20±7.78) received hot pack, short wave diathermy and intermittent traction; and the continuous group (n=30, mean age: 57.97±9.53) received hot pack, short wave diathermy and continuous traction. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The values of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale, and knee passive range of motion were measured at baseline, three-week and seven-week follow-up.
RESULTS: Compared with baseline at weeks 3 and 7, all the outcome measures, except range of motion, were significantly reduced in all groups (all P≤0.001). In terms of the change data from baseline to week 3, both traction groups were significantly superior to the control in the WOMAC physical function scores. Considering the change data from baseline to week 7, both traction groups were significantly superior to the control in the pain scores, physical function and total scores, while only the continuous group was significantly better than the control in the stiffness scores (control: 1.17 ± 1.64; continuous: 2.38 ± 1.44) (P=0.014). Compared with baseline at weeks 3 and 7, range of motion values significantly increased in both traction groups (P<0.05) but not in the control (P>0.05). However, there were no significant differences among the three groups considering the change data from baseline to week 7 in range of motion values (P=0.300).
CONCLUSIONS: Joint traction was found to be beneficial for the improvement of pain and physical function loss related to knee osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22960239     DOI: 10.1177/0269215512459062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Physical therapy options in rheumatic diseases: what is evidence-based?]

Authors:  U Lange; S Rehart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  MicroRNA-199-3p up-regulation enhances chondrocyte proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in knee osteoarthritis via DNMT3A repression.

Authors:  Wenqi Gu; Zhongmin Shi; Guoxun Song; Hongtao Zhang
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.575

3.  Surgical interventions for symptomatic mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jonathan S Palmer; A Paul Monk; Sally Hopewell; Lee E Bayliss; William Jackson; David J Beard; Andrew J Price
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-19

4.  Case study of continuous knee joint traction treatment on the pain and quality of life of patients with degenerative gonarthritis.

Authors:  Dong-Kyu Lee; Nam-Yong Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-06-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.