Literature DB >> 22959582

In vitro MR imaging of renal stones with an ultra-short echo time magnetic resonance imaging sequence.

Aya Yassin1, Ivan Pedrosa, Michael Kearney, Elizabeth Genega, Neil M Rofsky, Robert E Lenkinski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the magnetic resonance (MR) relaxation times (ie, T1 and T2 relaxation times) of a variety of kidney stone specimens using an ultra-short echo time (UTE) sequence and to correlate these values to their size and composition based on chemical analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study with waiver of informed consent. Between April 2009 and September 2009, stones from 36 patients underwent 1.5T MR imaging with two UTE pulse sequences to measure: 1) T2 relaxation times (repetition time [TR] = 1 second and multiple echo times [TEs] ranging from 0.1 ms up to 2 ms); 2) T1 relaxation times (TE = 0.1 ms and multiple TRs ranging from 500 ms to 2.5 seconds). A tube containing a solution of water and hydroxyapatite crystals near the stones served as reference standard. Results were compared to previous data obtained from experiments measuring the T1 and T2 of pure calcium oxalate and hydroxyapatite crystals suspended in water. Stones were submitted for chemical analysis. The stone size and composition was correlated to the relaxation time, and signal intensity.
RESULTS: The average stone size was 0.86 cm (range 0.1-3.3 cm). Twenty-one stones were visible by MR. The average size of MR-visible stones was 1.1 cm (range 0.15-3.3 cm) compared to 0.46 cm (range 0.1-0.9) for nonvisible stones. The mean T1 and T2 of MR-visible stones were 950 ms (range 138-3000 ms) and 3.12 ms (range 0.27-12 ms), respectively. The T1 (mean 1143, range 740-1583) and T1 (mean 8.31, range 4.6-12) values of calcium phosphate were longer than that for other stone compositions T1 (mean 953, range 138-3000) and T2 (mean 2.58, range 0.27-5.8; P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The T1- and T2-relaxation times of kidney stones are variable and depend on their composition and the size of the stones. UTE MR allows for visualization of renal stones in vitro.
Copyright © 2012 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22959582     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  4 in total

Review 1.  An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques.

Authors:  Wayne Brisbane; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Detection of different kidney stone types: an ex vivo comparison of ultrashort echo time MRI to reference standard CT.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Joseph G Cernigliaro; Robert A Pooley; Mellena D Bridges; Jamie G Giesbrandt; James C Williams; William E Haley
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.605

3.  CT, US and MRI of xanthine urinary stones: in-vitro and in-vivo analyses.

Authors:  Stephanie B Shamir; Qi Peng; Alan H Schoenfeld; Beth A Drzewiecki; Mark C Liszewski
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Three Dimensional Ultra-short Echo Time MRI Can Depict Cholesterol Components of Gallstones Bright.

Authors:  Mamoru Takahashi; Yasuo Takehara; Kenji Fujisaki; Tomoyuki Okuaki; Yukiko Fukuma; Norihiro Tooyama; Katsutoshi Ichijo; Tomoyasu Amano; Satoshi Goshima; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.471

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.