Literature DB >> 22959252

Humeroscapular positions in a shoulder range-of-motion-examination.

M L Pearl1, S Jackins, S B Lippitt, J A Sidles, F A Matsen.   

Abstract

Positions of the arm are traditionally described in relation to the thorax. Yet shoulder pathology most often lies in and about the glenohumeral joint, which then becomes the focus of treatment. Little is known about the relative motion between the humerus and the scapula primarily because there is no clinically accepted method for assessing and describing these positions. This paper proposes a clinical method for describing and measuring humeroscapular positions based on an anatomic definition of the plane of the scapula. Humeroscapular positions achieved by 75 normal subiects during a conventional (humerothoracic) shoulder range-of-motion examination are presented. Identification of the plane of the scapula is based on four palpable anatomic landmarks: (7) the inferior pole of the scapula, (2) the medial border of the scapula at the level of the scapular spine, (3) the posterolateral corner of the acromion, and (4) the tip of the coracoid. The plane of the scapula is defined by the line connecting the first two of these points and a point midway between the last two. Humeroscapular positions are specified by the plane of elevation and the angle of elevation in relation to this mobile scapular plane. Measurement of these positions was done with a goniometer facilitated by a "scapula-locating device" designed for this study. Maximal humerothoracic elevation of the arm was achieved with the humerus lust behind the scapular plane at 90° of humeroscapular elevation. Cross-body adduction positioned the humerus in a plane 51° anterior to the plane of the scapula, with most of the cross-body motion occurring between the scapula and thorax. External rotation at 90° of elevation in the coronal plane of the body (the apprehension position) positioned the humerus in a plane 17° posterior to the scapular plane. Humerothoracic extension and reaching up the back took place at very low angles of humeroscapular elevation.
Copyright © 1993 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Year:  2009        PMID: 22959252     DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80056-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of scapular local coordinate systems.

Authors:  Paula M Ludewig; Daniel R Hassett; Robert F Laprade; Paula R Camargo; Jonathan P Braman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  The influence of radiographic viewing perspective and demographics on the critical shoulder angle.

Authors:  Thomas Suter; Ariane Gerber Popp; Yue Zhang; Chong Zhang; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Reliability and Validity of the ActivForce Digital Dynamometer in Assessing Shoulder Muscle Force across Different User Experience Levels.

Authors:  Christos Karagiannopoulos; Sean Griech; Brian Leggin
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation.

Authors:  Paula M Ludewig; Vandana Phadke; Jonathan P Braman; Daniel R Hassett; Cort J Cieminski; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  MEASURING SCAPULAR MOVEMENT USING THREE-DIMENSIONAL ACROMIAL PROJECTION.

Authors:  Ronald W Hoard; William E Janes; Justin M Brown; Christina L Stephens; Jack R Engsberg
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2013-04-01

6.  Glenohumeral relationship in maximum elevation.

Authors:  Hiroaki Inui; Katsuya Nobuhara
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 7.  The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peter Beshara; David B Anderson; Matthew Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  External rotation during elevation of the arm.

Authors:  Hiroaki Inui; Takashi Hashimoto; Katsuya Nobuhara
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.