Literature DB >> 22959191

Long-term oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma.

Sarah P Psutka1, Adam S Feldman, W Scott McDougal, Francis J McGovern, Peter Mueller, Debra A Gervais.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is used to obtain local control of small renal masses. However, available long-term oncologic outcomes for RFA of RCC are limited by small numbers, short follow-up, and lack of pathologic diagnoses.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the oncologic effectiveness of RFA for the treatment of biopsy-proven RCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Exclusion criteria included prior RCC or metastatic RCC, familial syndromes, or T2 RCC. We retrospectively reviewed long-term oncologic outcomes for 185 patients with sporadic T1 RCC. Median follow-up was 6.43 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.3-7.7). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare proportions and medians, respectively. Disease-specific survival and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, then stratified by tumor stage, and comparisons were made using log-rank analysis. The 5-yr disease-free survival (DFS) and OS rates are reported. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median tumor size was 3 cm (IQR: 2.1-3.9 cm). Tumor stage was T1a: 143 (77.3%) or T1b: 42 (22.7%). Twenty-four patients (13%) were retreated for residual disease. There were 12 local recurrences (6.5%), 6 recurrences in T1a disease (4.2%) and 6 in T1b disease (14.3%) (p=0.0196). Median time to recurrence was 2.5 yr. Local salvage RFA was performed in six patients, of whom five remain disease free at 3.8-yr median follow-up. Tumor stage was the only significant predictor of DFS on multivariate analysis. At last follow-up, 164 patients (88.6%) were disease free (T1a: n=132 [92.3%]; T1b: n=32 [76.2%]; p=0.0038). OS was similar regardless of stage (p=0.06). Five patients developed metachronous renal tumors (2.7%). Four patients developed extrarenal metastases (2.2%), three of whom died of metastatic RCC (1.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: In poor surgical candidates, RFA results in durable local control and low risk of recurrence in T1a RCC. Higher stage correlates with a decreased disease-free survival. Long-term surveillance is necessary following RFA. Patient selection based on tumor characteristics, comorbid disease, and life expectancy is of paramount importance.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22959191     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  70 in total

1.  Canadian guidelines for the management of small renal masses (SRM).

Authors:  Michael A S Jewett; Ricardo Rendon; Louis Lacombe; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Simon Tanguay; Wassim Kassouf; Mike Leveridge; Ilias Cagiannos; Anil Kapoor; Stephen Pautler; Darrel Drachtenberg; Ronald Moore; Martin Gleave; Andrew Evans; Massoom Haider; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Safety, efficacy and predictors of local recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael Z Su; Fatima Memon; Howard M Lau; Andrew J Brooks; Manish I Patel; Henry H Woo; Simon V Bariol; Philip Vladica
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  [Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses : A retrospective, single center data analysis].

Authors:  O Heißler; S Seklehner; H Fellner; P F Engelhardt; A Chemelli; C Riedl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Small renal cell carcinoma-active surveillance and ablation].

Authors:  J J Wendler; R Damm; U-B Liehr; T Brunner; M Pech; M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Non-Surgical Ablative Therapy for Management of Small Renal Masses-Current Status and Future Trends.

Authors:  K Farrag; S Sriprasad
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 6.  Decision Making: Thermal Ablation Options for Small Renal Masses.

Authors:  Colin J McCarthy; Debra A Gervais
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Canadian Urological Association guideline for followup of patients after treatment of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Leonardo L Monteiro; Darrel E Drachenberg; Adrian S Fairey; Antonio Finelli; Anil Kapoor; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Michael J Leveridge; Nicholas E Power; Frederic Pouliot; Ricardo A Rendon; Robert Sabbagh; Alan I So; Simon Tanguay; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  [Ablative therapy of small renal masses].

Authors:  M C Kriegmair; N Wagener; S J Diehl; N Rathmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Comparison of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and open partial nephrectomy in patients with a small renal mass.

Authors:  Chang Shik Youn; Jong Mok Park; Ji Yong Lee; Ki Hak Song; Yong Gil Na; Chong Koo Sul; Jae Sung Lim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-09-10

10.  Motion compensation for MRI-compatible patient-mounted needle guide device: estimation of targeting accuracy in MRI-guided kidney cryoablations.

Authors:  Junichi Tokuda; Laurent Chauvin; Brian Ninni; Takahisa Kato; Franklin King; Kemal Tuncali; Nobuhiko Hata
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.