Literature DB >> 2295905

Phase II trial of intraperitoneal mitoxantrone in the management of refractory ovarian cancer.

M Markman1, M George, T Hakes, B Reichman, W Hoskins, S Rubin, W Jones, L Almadrones, J L Lewis.   

Abstract

To define both the toxicity and efficacy of intraperitoneal mitoxantrone in the treatment of refractory ovarian carcinoma, 31 patients were entered onto a phase II trial of this agent delivered in a 2 L treatment volume on a monthly basis. Due to excessive local pain at the initial dose level (30 mg/m2), the amount of drug delivered with each treatment course was reduced to 20 mg/m2. Despite this reduction, 74% of patients required narcotic analgesia during treatment. In addition, there were four episodes of bowel obstruction (one requiring surgical intervention) during therapy, and two patients developed bowel obstruction and intraabdominal abscesses following the completion of treatment. Six of 18 evaluable patients (33%) whose largest tumor diameter was less than or equal to 1 cm at protocol initiation experienced surgically documented responses, compared with one of 11 patients (9%) whose largest tumor was greater than 1 cm in diameter. If the two patients exhibiting what we called a mixed response to treatment are included, seven of 21 patients previously treated with intraperitoneal cisplatin responded to this treatment program, including four patients who had failed to respond to intraperitoneal cisplatin. No responding patient has demonstrated clinical evidence of relapse with a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 3+ to 13+ months) from response laparotomy. Intraperitoneal mitoxantrone is an active treatment program in patients with small-volume refractory ovarian carcinoma, but local toxicity can be severe. Due to the toxicity encountered with this specific program, its use cannot be recommended for standard clinical practice. However, in view of the activity observed in refractory ovarian carcinoma, including responses in patients who had previously failed intraperitoneal cisplatin, it is important to continue to explore alternative therapeutic regimens using intraperitoneal mitoxantrone to reduce local toxicity while maintaining or improving efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2295905     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.1.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

1.  Impact of laparotomy finding of significant intraabdominal adhesions on the surgically defined complete response rate to subsequent salvage intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Markman; W Jones; J L Lewis; S Rubin; T Hakes; B Reichman; R Barakat; J Curtin; L Almadrones; W Hoskins
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Csilla Hasovits; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Association between pretreatment CA-125 levels and surgically documented complete responses in patients with ovarian cancer treated with second-line intraperitoneal therapy.

Authors:  M Markman; B Reichman; T Hakes; J Curtin; R Barakat; S Rubin; W Jones; J L Lewis; L Almadrones; W Hoskins
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Intraperitoneal drug delivery of antineoplastics.

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Intestinal obstruction due to diffuse peritoneal fibrosis at 2 years after the successful treatment of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma with intraperitoneal mitoxantrone.

Authors:  L T Vlasveld; B G Taal; B B Kroon; M P Gallee; S Rodenhuis
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of mitoxantrone after intraperitoneal administration.

Authors:  J D Nagel; F J Varossieau; R Dubbelman; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; J G McVie
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  D Faulds; J A Balfour; P Chrisp; H D Langtry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Salvage intraperitoneal therapy of small-volume residual ovarian cancer: impact of pretreatment finding of peritoneal carcinomatosis on the surgical complete response rate.

Authors:  M Markman; B Reichman; T Hakes; R Barakat; J Curtin; S Rubin; W Jones; J L Lewis; L Almadrones; W Hoskins
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Near-infrared fluorescent imaging of metastatic ovarian cancer using folate receptor-targeted high-density lipoprotein nanocarriers.

Authors:  Ian R Corbin; Kenneth K Ng; Lili Ding; Andrea Jurisicova; Gang Zheng
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.307

10.  "Atypical" multidrug resistance in human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 selected for resistance to doxorubicin (A2780 DX3).

Authors:  G Cimoli; M Valenti; E Noviello; S Parodi; A Mazzoni; E Rovini; F De Sessa; P Russo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.