Literature DB >> 2295871

Identifying children with specific reading disabilities from listening and reading discrepancy scores.

C Spring1, L French.   

Abstract

A method of identifying children with specific reading disabilities by identifying discrepancies between their reading and listening comprehension scores was validated with disabled and nondisabled readers in Grades 4, 5, and 6. The method is based on a modification of the reading comprehension subtest of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test (Dunn & Markwardt, 1970). In this modification, even-numbered sentences are read by subjects, and odd-numbered sentences are read by the test administrator as subjects listen. The features of this test that reduce demands on working memory, thereby making it suitable for the detection of a discrepancy between reading and listening comprehension in readers with disabilities, are discussed. A significant group-by-modality interaction was obtained. Children with reading disabilities scored significantly lower on reading than on listening comprehension, while nondisabled readers scored slightly higher, but not significantly so, on reading than on listening comprehension. The appropriateness of this method as a substitute for the traditional method, which is based on the detection of a discrepancy between intelligence and reading and which has recently been proscribed in certain school districts, is discussed. Issues concerning the listening comprehension skills of disabled readers are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2295871     DOI: 10.1177/002221949002300112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Learn Disabil        ISSN: 0022-2194


  9 in total

1.  Individual differences in decoding skill, print exposure, and cortical structure in young adults.

Authors:  Clinton L Johns; Andrew A Jahn; Hannah R Jones; Dave Kush; Peter J Molfese; Julie A Van Dyke; James S Magnuson; Whitney Tabor; W Einar Mencl; Donald P Shankweiler; David Braze
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Speaking up for vocabulary: reading skill differences in young adults.

Authors:  David Braze; Whitney Tabor; Donald P Shankweiler; W Einar Mencl
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2007 May-Jun

3.  Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns; Anuenue Kukona
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-03-19

4.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Combining Old and New for Better Understanding and Predicting Dyslexia.

Authors:  Richard K Wagner; Ashley A Edwards; Antje Malkowski; Chris Schatschneider; Rachel E Joyner; Sarah Wood; Fotena A Zirps
Journal:  New Dir Child Adolesc Dev       Date:  2019-04-30

6.  The Prevalence of Dyslexia: A New Approach to Its Estimation.

Authors:  Richard K Wagner; Fotena A Zirps; Ashley A Edwards; Sarah G Wood; Rachel E Joyner; Betsy J Becker; Guangyun Liu; Bethany Beal
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2020-05-26

7.  Orthography and Modality Influence Speech Production in Adults and Children.

Authors:  Meredith Saletta; Lisa Goffman; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Tennessee meets the challenge of dyslexia.

Authors:  S Y Padget; D F Knight; D J Sawyer
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1996-01

9.  Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading.

Authors:  David Braze; Leonard Katz; James S Magnuson; W Einar Mencl; Whitney Tabor; Julie A Van Dyke; Tao Gong; Clinton L Johns; Donald P Shankweiler
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2015-12-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.