Literature DB >> 22958676

Is regional species diversity bounded or unbounded?

Howard V Cornell1.   

Abstract

Two conflicting hypotheses have been proposed to explain large-scale species diversity patterns and dynamics. The unbounded hypothesis proposes that regional diversity depends only on time and diversification rate and increases without limit. The bounded hypothesis proposes that ecological constraints place upper limits on regional diversity and that diversity is usually close to its limit. Recent evidence from the fossil record, phylogenetic analysis, biogeography, and phenotypic disparity during lineage diversification suggests that diversity is constrained by ecological processes but that it is rarely asymptotic. Niche space is often unfilled or can be more finely subdivided and still permit coexistence, and new niche space is often created before ecological limits are reached. Damped increases in diversity over time are the prevalent pattern, suggesting the need for a new 'damped increase hypothesis'. The damped increase hypothesis predicts that diversity generally increases through time but that its rate of increase is often slowed by ecological constraints. However, slowing due to niche limitation must be distinguished from other possible mechanisms creating similar patterns. These include sampling artifacts, the inability to detect extinctions or declines in clade diversity with some methods, the distorting effects of correlated speciation-extinction dynamics, the likelihood that opportunities for allopatric speciation will vary in space and time, and the role of undetected natural enemies in reducing host ranges and thus slowing speciation rates. The taxonomic scope of regional diversity studies must be broadened to include all ecologically similar species so that ecological constraints may be accurately inferred. The damped increase hypothesis suggests that information on evolutionary processes such as time-for-speciation and intrinsic diversification rates as well as ecological factors will be required to explain why regional diversity varies among times, places and taxa.
© 2012 The Author. Biological Reviews © 2012 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22958676     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00245.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  27 in total

Review 1.  Exploring macroevolution using modern and fossil data.

Authors:  Michael J Benton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Interdependence of specialization and biodiversity in Phanerozoic marine invertebrates.

Authors:  Sabine Nürnberg; Martin Aberhan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Niche filling slows the diversification of Himalayan songbirds.

Authors:  Trevor D Price; Daniel M Hooper; Caitlyn D Buchanan; Ulf S Johansson; D Thomas Tietze; Per Alström; Urban Olsson; Mousumi Ghosh-Harihar; Farah Ishtiaq; Sandeep K Gupta; Jochen Martens; Bettina Harr; Pratap Singh; Dhananjai Mohan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The challenges to inferring the regulators of biodiversity in deep time.

Authors:  Thomas H G Ezard; Tiago B Quental; Michael J Benton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Understanding how biodiversity unfolds through time under neutral theory.

Authors:  Olivier Missa; Calvin Dytham; Hélène Morlon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The uncertain role of diversity dependence in species diversification and the need to incorporate time-varying carrying capacities.

Authors:  Charles R Marshall; Tiago B Quental
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Diversity-dependent evolutionary rates in early Palaeozoic zooplankton.

Authors:  Michael Foote; Roger A Cooper; James S Crampton; Peter M Sadler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Comparing Adaptive Radiations Across Space, Time, and Taxa.

Authors:  Rosemary G Gillespie; Gordon M Bennett; Luc De Meester; Jeffrey L Feder; Robert C Fleischer; Luke J Harmon; Andrew P Hendry; Matthew L Knope; James Mallet; Christopher Martin; Christine E Parent; Austin H Patton; Karin S Pfennig; Daniel Rubinoff; Dolph Schluter; Ole Seehausen; Kerry L Shaw; Elizabeth Stacy; Martin Stervander; James T Stroud; Catherine Wagner; Guinevere O U Wogan
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Mammal diversity will take millions of years to recover from the current biodiversity crisis.

Authors:  Matt Davis; Søren Faurby; Jens-Christian Svenning
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Lizard thermal trait variation at multiple scales: a review.

Authors:  Susana Clusella-Trullas; Steven L Chown
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.