AIMS: To determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic correlates of efavirenz central nervous system (CNS) side effects following a single dose. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy HIV-negative African Americans were administered a 600 mg dose of efavirenz. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics were drawn serially from 0 to 12 h post-dose. Neuropsychometric testing with drowsiness visual analogue scale, grooved pegboard and letter digit substitution tests was done the day prior to dosing and at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 h post-dose. Subjective CNS symptoms were assessed at 6 h post-dose. Composite CYP2B6 516/983 genotype was determined. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic indices reflecting increased plasma efavirenz exposure were associated with slower non-dominant hand grooved pegboard task completion (Cmax , P1 h = 0.01, P2 h = 0.05, P3 h = 0.03, P4 h = 0.01; AUC, P1 h = 0.04; clearance P1 h = 0.05, P2 h = 0.02, P6 h = 0.01). In a repeated measures model analysis that adjusted timing of neuropsychometric testing for timing of peak drug concentration, clearance (P < 0.001), AUC(0.312 h) (P = 0.001) and Cmax (P = 0.008) were associated with non-dominant grooved pegboard test performance. CYP2B6 genotype trended to correlate with non-dominant hand grooved pegboard at 4 and 6 h (P = 0.07 and 0.06). Decreased drowsiness at 6 h was associated with higher Cmax (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Following a single dose of efavirenz, an association between pharmacokinetics and neuropsychometric performance was discernable. A weaker association between genotype and neurocognitive test performance is likely mediated by effect of genotype on plasma clearance. Strategies that lower Cmax during initial dosing may decrease CNS side effects.
AIMS: To determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic correlates of efavirenz central nervous system (CNS) side effects following a single dose. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy HIV-negative African Americans were administered a 600 mg dose of efavirenz. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics were drawn serially from 0 to 12 h post-dose. Neuropsychometric testing with drowsiness visual analogue scale, grooved pegboard and letter digit substitution tests was done the day prior to dosing and at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 h post-dose. Subjective CNS symptoms were assessed at 6 h post-dose. Composite CYP2B6 516/983 genotype was determined. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic indices reflecting increased plasma efavirenz exposure were associated with slower non-dominant hand grooved pegboard task completion (Cmax , P1 h = 0.01, P2 h = 0.05, P3 h = 0.03, P4 h = 0.01; AUC, P1 h = 0.04; clearance P1 h = 0.05, P2 h = 0.02, P6 h = 0.01). In a repeated measures model analysis that adjusted timing of neuropsychometric testing for timing of peak drug concentration, clearance (P < 0.001), AUC(0.312 h) (P = 0.001) and Cmax (P = 0.008) were associated with non-dominant grooved pegboard test performance. CYP2B6 genotype trended to correlate with non-dominant hand grooved pegboard at 4 and 6 h (P = 0.07 and 0.06). Decreased drowsiness at 6 h was associated with higher Cmax (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Following a single dose of efavirenz, an association between pharmacokinetics and neuropsychometric performance was discernable. A weaker association between genotype and neurocognitive test performance is likely mediated by effect of genotype on plasma clearance. Strategies that lower Cmax during initial dosing may decrease CNS side effects.
Authors: Bryan A Ward; J Christopher Gorski; David R Jones; Stephen D Hall; David A Flockhart; Zeruesenay Desta Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-04-03 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Tim R H Read; Dianne Carey; Patrick Mallon; Anne Mijch; Ruth Goodall; Fleur Hudson; Handan Wand; Sean Emery Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: David W Haas; Laura M Smeaton; Robert W Shafer; Gregory K Robbins; Gene D Morse; Line Labbe; Grant R Wilkinson; David B Clifford; Richard T D'Aquila; Victor De Gruttola; Richard B Pollard; Thomas C Merigan; Martin S Hirsch; Alfred L George; John P Donahue; Richard B Kim Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Carmina R Fumaz; Albert Tuldrà; Ma José Ferrer; Roger Paredes; Anna Bonjoch; Toni Jou; Eugènia Negredo; Joan Romeu; Guillem Sirera; Cristina Tural; Bonaventura Clotet Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Heather J Ribaudo; Huan Liu; Matthias Schwab; Elke Schaeffeler; Michel Eichelbaum; Alison A Motsinger-Reif; Marylyn D Ritchie; Ulrich M Zanger; Edward P Acosta; Gene D Morse; Roy M Gulick; Gregory K Robbins; David Clifford; David W Haas Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Vincent T Ciavatta; Edyta K Bichler; Iris A Speigel; Courtney C Elder; Shavonne L Teng; William R Tyor; Paul S García Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Zeruesenay Desta; Roseann S Gammal; Li Gong; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Aditya H Gaur; Chonlaphat Sukasem; Jennifer Hockings; Alan Myers; Marelize Swart; Rachel F Tyndale; Collen Masimirembwa; Otito F Iwuchukwu; Sanika Chirwa; Jeffrey Lennox; Andrea Gaedigk; Teri E Klein; David W Haas Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Uriel Sandkovsky; Anthony T Podany; Courtney V Fletcher; Andrew Owen; Angela Felton-Coleman; Lee C Winchester; Kevin Robertson; Susan Swindells Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Natália Bordin Andriguetti; Helena Katherina Van Schalkwyk; Daniel Thomas Barratt; Joseph Tucci; Paul Pumuye; Andrew Alexander Somogyi Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Sean G Anderson; Michael McCaul; Saye Khoo; Lubbe Wiesner; Ned Sacktor; John A Joska; Eric H Decloedt Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2020-02