Literature DB >> 22957850

Masticatory performance and taste perception in patients submitted to cancer treatment.

J B Caputo1, S S Campos, S M Pereira, P M Castelo, M B D Gavião, L S Marques, L J Pereira.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse mastication and the sense of taste in 39 patients submitted to cancer treatment in different areas of the body and to compare these variables with those of 44 control individuals within the same age range. The following aspects were assessed: dental status (DMFT); stimulated and non-stimulated salivary flow; sense of taste (salty, sweet, bitter and sour); and masticatory performance (MP), through the calculation of X(50). Logistic regression models were established to test the association between the independent variables and cancer treatment. Cancer patients had lesser stimulated salivary flow, a smaller number of teeth and occlusal units, worse MP, higher salty, sweet and sour taste scores and a lower bitter taste score (P < 0·05). A significant positive correlation was found between MP and the DMFT index in both groups (P < 0·05), meaning that a lower DMFT index value denoted a smaller X(50) value (better masticatory performance). The logistic regression model revealed that patients who had undergone cancer treatment had a greater probability of exhibiting a smaller number of teeth, higher salty and smaller bitter taste scores (P < 0·05). It was concluded that patients who were submitted to cancer treatment presented oral physiology alterations when compared with control subjects at the same age range.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22957850     DOI: 10.1111/joor.12005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  5 in total

1.  The course of swallowing problems in the first 2 years after diagnosis of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Jorine A Vermaire; Cornelis P J Raaijmakers; Evelyn M Monninkhof; C René Leemans; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Robert P Takes; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Femke Jansen; Johannes A Langendijk; Chris H J Terhaard; Caroline M Speksnijder
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 2.  Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment.

Authors:  Thais Marques Simek Vega Gonçalves; Martin Schimmel; Andries van der Bilt; Jianshe Chen; Hilbert W van der Glas; Kaoru Kohyama; Martine Hennequin; Marie-Agnès Peyron; Alain Woda; Claudio Rodrigues Leles; Luciano José Pereira
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  Tongue function and its influence on masticatory performance in patients treated for oral cancer: a five-year prospective study.

Authors:  Reilly J de Groot; Matthias A W Merkx; Merel N S Hamann; Henk S Brand; Anton F J de Haan; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; Caroline M Speksnijder
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Effect of using tobacco on taste perception.

Authors:  Yugandhara S Kale; Nupura Vibhute; Uzma Belgaumi; Vidya Kadashetti; Sushma Bommanavar; Wasim Kamate
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-08-28

5.  Factors associated with masticatory function as measured with the Mixing Ability Test in patients with head and neck cancer before and after treatment: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jorine A Vermaire; Cornelis P J Raaijmakers; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Chris H J Terhaard; Caroline M Speksnijder
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.