Literature DB >> 22957120

Prevalence of hepatitis E virus antibodies in pigs in Northern Italy.

Nicola Martinelli1, Andrea Luppi, Paolo Cordioli, Guerino Lombardi, Antonio Lavazza.   

Abstract

The prevalence of the hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in pigs in Northern Italy was serologically examined. The survey was carried out on 39 farms: 17 farrow-to-feeder, 10 farrow-to-finish, and 12 fattening enterprises. There were 1,422 sera that were tested using commercial indirect ELISA. This method originally developed for testing human sera was adapted for the analysis of pig sera. All farms except one (97.43%) and 714 sera samples (50.21%) resulted positive for anti-HEV IgG antibodies. This study confirms that HEV is widespread in pigs in Italy and might be endemic on most farms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ELISA; Hepatitis E virus; antibodies; pig; prevalence

Year:  2011        PMID: 22957120      PMCID: PMC3426339          DOI: 10.3402/iee.v1i0.7331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol        ISSN: 2000-8686


Hepatitis type E (HE) is considered an emerging zoonotic disease in developed countries (1). The hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a small, non-enveloped, single-stranded RNA virus classified in the Hepeviridae family as Hepevirus genus. Up to now, four major genotypes (2) and only one serotype have been identified (3). Genotypes 1 and 2 are restricted to humans and often associated with large outbreaks and epidemics in developing countries with poor sanitation. Genotypes 3 and 4 infect humans, pigs, and other animal species and have been responsible for sporadic cases of hepatitis E in both developing and industrialised countries. In humans, HEV is responsible for acute hepatitis that rarely leads to death, except in pregnant women where the fatality rate is up to 25%. In developed countries, autochthonous HEV infections are suspected due to contact with infected animals, in particular pig and wild boar, and certainly due to ingestion of contaminated raw meat and seafood (4). Nucleotide sequence analysis has shown that swine and human HEV isolates from the same geographic area are more similar than swine HEV isolates from different regions (5). Furthermore, it has been reported that there are more anti-HEV antibodies among swine handlers than in a control population (6). Anti-HEV antibodies have been found in several animal species: swine, bovine, dog, horse, wild boar, deer, and rodents. In swine, several studies on anti-HEV prevalence show high levels of seroprevalence proving that it is endemic in developed countries. Hepatitis E virus has been identified by RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction) on pig farms both in Northern and Central Italy (7), but data on seroprevalence are not yet available. In this report we describe the results of a study to define HEV seroprevalence in Northern Italian pig herds.

Materials and methods

From January to June 2008, 1,422 pig blood samples were collected on 39 pig farms in Northern Italy. Ten farms were farrow-to-finish, 17 farrow-to-weaning, and 12 were fattening operations. On average, 10% of animals per farm were sampled and the sera were analysed for anti-HEV IgGs using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The ELISA test was a human commercial kit (HEV-Ab, Diagnostic Bioprobes, Milan, Italy), modified with a specific tracer; that is, goat anti-swine instead of goat anti-human IgG. This test is based on the use of plates coated with a recombinant antigen containing immunodominat epitopes from the ORF2 and ORF3 regions of Mexican (genotype 2) and Burmese (genotype 1) viral human strains. The ELISA method was performed following the kit instructions. Each pig serum (50 µl/well) was examined at a fixed dilution (1:100 in PBS containing 1% yeast). The peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-swine IgG (Goat anti-pig IgG, Serotec, Oxford, UK) were used at 1:3000 dilution. The absorbance value was measured at 492 nm wavelength and the results expressed as optical density (OD). The pre- and post-infection serum from pigs experimentally infected with HEV were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. The cut-off value used was 0.274 and was calculated as the mean OD value plus three standard deviation (sd), of 80 antibody-negative pig sera. The Chi-squared test was performed on contingency tables to find P-values.

Results and discussion

The OD values of pig sera for anti-HEV IgG values ranged from 0.045 to 3.369 with an average OD of 0.52 (sd 0.62) and a median value of 0.352. Using the cut-off value of 0.274, 38 out of 39 farms had at least one seropositive sample (97.43%, 95% CI: 92.5–100%) and 714/1422 serum samples (50.21%, 95% CI: 47.7–52.8%) were positive for anti-HEV IgG. The mean OD of positive samples was 0.914 (sd 0.67). The mean anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence on farms was 52.8%. The sows presented the highest seroprevalence (70.6%, 95% CI: 67–74.1%) and the risk of developing seroconversion was about four times higher than all the other groups put together (OR=4.7; IC=3.7–5.9; Table 1).
Table 1

Number of positive serum samples displayed by productive age

Productive agePositive samplesSeroprevalence 95% CIOR 95% CI P
Sow447/63370.6% (67–74.1%)4.7 3.7–5.9<0.00001
Weaner (up to 2 months)7/5812.1% (3.7–20.4%)0.1 0.05–0.3<0.00001
Slips (2–3 months)41/13330.8% (23–38.7%)0.4 0.3–0.6<0.00001
Fattening (4–6 months)135/32541.5% (36.2–46.9%)0.6 0.5–0.80.0005
Finisher (over 6 months)84/27330.8% (25.3–36.2%)0.4 0.3–0.5<0.00001
Total714/142250.2% (47.6–52.8%)
Number of positive serum samples displayed by productive age Considering the different type of farms, the mean seroprevalence value was 70.5% (ranged 21.6–100%) in farrow-to-weaning farms, 61.2% (0–94.1%) in farrow-to-finish farms, and 30.3% (3.6–81.3%) in fattening farms (Table 2). A direct correlation between farm size and seroprevalence was also evident (Table 3).
Table 2

Seroprevalence in different type of herd, displayed by productive age

Farm typeFarrow-finish (10 herds)Farrow-weaning (17 herds)Fattening (12 herds)



Prevalence61.2% 95% IC 55.8–66.670.5% 95% IC 66.3–74.630.3% 95% IC 26.8–33.9



Productive ageSowFatteningFinisherSowSlipsWeanerSlipsFatteningFinisher
Tested sera18291324512358110234241
Positive sera1294412318167259172
Prevalence IC 95%70.9% 64.3–77.548.3% 38–58.637.5% 20.7–54.370.5% 66.3–74.769.6% 50.8–88.412.1% 3.7–20.422,7% 14.9–30.538.9% 32.6–45.129,9% 24.1–35.6
Table 3

Seroprevalence in farms according to the herd size

Herd sizeSeroprevalence (95% IC)OR (95% IC) P
<100051.2% (45.8–56.8)1.1 (0.8–1.4)0.70
1000–400040.7% (37.4–44.1)0.4 (0.3–0.5)<0.0001
>400075.1% (70.2–80)3.9 (2.9–5.2)<0.0001
Seroprevalence in different type of herd, displayed by productive age Seroprevalence in farms according to the herd size The data indicate a high seroprevalence for anti-HEV antibodies in an Italian pig population, even if the percentage of seropositive animals varied widely among herds, being around 0% on some farms and almost 100% on others. In particular, the seroprevalence was higher in larger herds and it varied greatly among different age classes. In fact, we found the highest and the lowest seroprevalence in sows and in weaners, respectively; in piglets (8–16 weeks of age) we got a lower seroprevalence than in fattenings (up to 24 weeks). Unexpectedly, seroprevalence decreased in finishers (30.8%), perhaps due to the mixing of pigs from different farms and to the absence of sows in these herds. Such differences are probably due to the dynamics of the infection in swine, which is influenced by maternal immunity. Passive immunity protects piglets up to 2 months old and, after the infection, seroconversion occurs with IgG increase mainly at 15 weeks old. This infection dynamic is supported by studies based on detected viral RNA in faeces, with the highest values in pigs around 6 months old and also at slaughter time, suggesting that HEV can infect at any age (8). Seminati and collaborators (9) had similar results in Spain: the total anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence was 41.9% in sera collected from 1998 to 2000 and 60.8% in sera of gilts and sows collected from 1998 to 1999. Other studies conducted on small-sized pig sera samplings showed seroprevalences in developed countries: United Kingdom (85%), Sweden (58%), Germany (23%), and the United States (34.5%) (6). In Canada, 594 out of 998 (59.5%) pig sera were seropositive with significant variations between geographic regions (10). Human genotype 1 and 2 antigens have previously been used to test human samples with good specificity and sensitivity (11). Due to the existence of common immunodominant epitopes in human and swine HEV (3), these antigens are efficient in capturing pig antibodies produced against the HEV swine strain circulating in Northern Italy (7). In conclusion, although there are a few cases recognising human infection, HEV is widespread on pig farms in Northern Italy. The high seroprevalence in pigs should raise concern as it has been described previously that seropositive animals, despite developing an immunological response, could still contain HEV at slaughter age (12), representing a risk for food security and for persons in contact with pig or pork products.
  12 in total

1.  Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis E virus.

Authors:  G G Schlauder; I K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.327

2.  Prevalence of hepatitis E virus antibodies in Canadian swine herds and identification of a novel variant of swine hepatitis E virus.

Authors:  D Yoo; P Willson; Y Pei; M A Hayes; A Deckert; C E Dewey; R M Friendship; Y Yoon; M Gottschalk; C Yason; A Giulivi
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2001-11

3.  Hepatitis E virus (HEV) capsid antigens derived from viruses of human and swine origin are equally efficient for detecting anti-HEV by enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  R E Engle; C Yu; S U Emerson; X-J Meng; R H Purcell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnostic value of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) tests based on HEV RNA in an area where hepatitis E is not endemic.

Authors:  C C Lin; J C Wu; T T Chang; W Y Chang; M L Yu; A W Tam; S C Wang; Y H Huang; F Y Chang; S D Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection by reverse transcription-PCR and genetic characterization of field isolates of swine hepatitis E virus from pigs in different geographic regions of the United States.

Authors:  F F Huang; G Haqshenas; D K Guenette; P G Halbur; S K Schommer; F W Pierson; T E Toth; X J Meng
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis E virus in veterinarians working with swine and in normal blood donors in the United States and other countries.

Authors:  X J Meng; B Wiseman; F Elvinger; D K Guenette; T E Toth; R E Engle; S U Emerson; R H Purcell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Hepatitis E virus in Italy: molecular analysis of travel-related and autochthonous cases.

Authors:  Giuseppina La Rosa; Michele Muscillo; Valentina Spuri Vennarucci; Anna Rosa Garbuglia; Patrizia La Scala; Maria Rosaria Capobianchi
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 8.  Hepatitis E: an emerging infection in developed countries.

Authors:  Harry R Dalton; Richard Bendall; Samreen Ijaz; Malcolm Banks
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  Distribution of hepatitis E virus infection and its prevalence in pigs on commercial farms in Spain.

Authors:  C Seminati; E Mateu; B Peralta; N de Deus; M Martin
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.688

10.  Widespread diffusion of genotype 3 hepatitis E virus among farming swine in Northern Italy.

Authors:  Ilaria Di Bartolo; Francesca Martelli; Nadia Inglese; Manoocher Pourshaban; Andrea Caprioli; Fabio Ostanello; Franco Maria Ruggeri
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  6 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis and epidemiological history of Hepatitis E virus 3f and 3c in swine and wild boar, Italy.

Authors:  Alessandra Lo Presti; Roberto Bruni; Umbertina Villano; Cinzia Marcantonio; Michele Equestre; Massimo Ciuffetelli; Alessandro Grimaldi; Elisabetta Suffredini; Simona Di Pasquale; Dario De Medici; Anna Rita Ciccaglione
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-10-14

2.  Seroprevalence and molecular characteristics of hepatitis E virus in household-raised pig population in the Philippines.

Authors:  Xiaofang Liu; Mariko Saito; Yusuke Sayama; Ellie Suzuki; Fedelino F Malbas; Hazel O Galang; Yuki Furuse; Mayuko Saito; Tiancheng Li; Akira Suzuki; Hitoshi Oshitani
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Detection and Molecular Characterisation of Swine Hepatitis E Virus in Brescia Province, Italy.

Authors:  Enrico Pavoni; Ilaria Barbieri; Barbara Bertasi; Guerino Lombardi; Giuseppe Giangrosso; Paolo Cordioli; Marina Nadia Losio
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2015-05-28

Review 4.  From the epidemiology of hepatitis E virus (HEV) within the swine reservoir to public health risk mitigation strategies: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Morgane Salines; Mathieu Andraud; Nicolas Rose
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Hepatitis E Virus Circulation in Italy: Phylogenetic and Evolutionary Analysis.

Authors:  Carla Montesano; Marta Giovanetti; Marco Ciotti; Eleonora Cella; Alessandra Lo Presti; Alba Grifoni; Gianguglielmo Zehender; Silvia Angeletti; Massimo Ciccozzi
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 0.660

6.  Prevalence and phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis E virus in pigs in Vietnam.

Authors:  Hu Suk Lee; Duy Tung Dao; Vuong Nghia Bui; Ngoc Anh Bui; Thanh Duy Le; Hung Nguyen-Viet; Delia Grace; Krishna K Thakur; Katsuro Hagiwara
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.741

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.