Literature DB >> 22957109

Acceptance of Evolution Increases with Student Academic Level: A Comparison Between a Secular and a Religious College.

Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño C1, Avelina Espinosa.   

Abstract

Acceptance of evolution among the general public, high schools, teachers, and scientists has been documented in the USA; little is known about college students' views on evolution; this population is relevant since it transits from a high-school/parent-protective environment to an independent role in societal decisions. Here we compare perspectives about evolution, creationism, and intelligent design (ID) between a secular (S) and a religious (R) college in the Northeastern USA. Interinstitutional comparisons showed that 64% (mean S + R) biology majors vs. 42/62% (S/R) nonmajors supported the exclusive teaching of evolution in science classes; 24/29% (S/R) biology majors vs. 26/38% (S/R) nonmajors perceived ID as both alternative to evolution and/or scientific theory about the origin of life; 76% (mean S + R) biology majors and nonmajors accepted evolutionary explanations about the origin of life; 86% (mean S + R) biology majors vs. 79% (mean S + R) nonmajors preferred science courses where human evolution is discussed; 76% (mean S+R) biology majors vs. 79% (mean S + R) nonmajors welcomed questions about evolution in exams and/or thought that such questions should always be in exams; and 66% (mean S + R) biology majors vs. 46% (mean S + R) nonmajors admitted they accept evolution openly and/or privately. Intrainstitutional comparisons showed that overall acceptance of evolution among biologists (S or R) increased gradually from the freshman to the senior year, due to exposure to upper-division courses with evolutionary content. College curricular/pedagogical reform should fortify evolution literacy at all education levels, particularly among nonbiologists.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22957109      PMCID: PMC3433559          DOI: 10.1007/s12052-009-0175-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution (N Y)        ISSN: 1936-6426


  24 in total

1.  Science communication. Public acceptance of evolution.

Authors:  Jon D Miller; Eugenie C Scott; Shinji Okamoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Stepwise formation of the bacterial flagellar system.

Authors:  Renyi Liu; Howard Ochman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The threat from creationism to the rational teaching of biology.

Authors:  Athel Cornish-Bowden; María Luz Cárdenas
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.612

Review 4.  Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup.

Authors:  Trevor D Lamb; Shaun P Collin; Edward N Pugh
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Biochemistry by design.

Authors:  Barbara C Forrest; Paul R Gross
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 13.807

6.  Languages evolve in punctuational bursts.

Authors:  Quentin D Atkinson; Andrew Meade; Chris Venditti; Simon J Greenhill; Mark Pagel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Number and arrangement of extraocular muscles in primitive gnathostomes: evidence from extinct placoderm fishes.

Authors:  Gavin C Young
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 8.  The application of molecular genetic approaches to the study of human evolution.

Authors:  L Luca Cavalli-Sforza; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Comparative primate genomics.

Authors:  Wolfgang Enard; Svante Paabo
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.929

10.  Evolution and creationism in America's classrooms: a national portrait.

Authors:  Michael B Berkman; Julianna Sandell Pacheco; Eric Plutzer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  8 in total

1.  Introduction: why people do not accept evolution: using protistan diversity to promote evolution literacy.

Authors:  Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño-C; Avelina Espinosa
Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Evolution Controversy: A Phenomenon Prompted by the Incompatibility between Science and Religious Beliefs.

Authors:  Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño-C; Avelina Espinosa
Journal:  Int J Sci Soc       Date:  2015-05-14

3.  New England Faculty and College Students Differ in Their Views About Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design, and Religiosity.

Authors:  Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño C; Avelina Espinosa
Journal:  Evolution (N Y)       Date:  2010-12-18

4.  The Jackprot Simulation Couples Mutation Rate with Natural Selection to Illustrate How Protein Evolution Is Not Random.

Authors:  Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño C; Avelina Espinosa; Chunyan Y Bai
Journal:  Evolution (N Y)       Date:  2011-03-24

5.  Educators of Prospective Teachers Hesitate to Embrace Evolution Due to Deficient Understanding of Science/Evolution and High Religiosity.

Authors:  Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño-C; Avelina Espinosa
Journal:  Evolution (N Y)       Date:  2012-03-06

6.  On the Theory of Evolution Versus the Concept of Evolution: Three Observations.

Authors:  Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño C; Avelina Espinosa
Journal:  Evolution (N Y)       Date:  2010-12-15

7.  Illuminating the complexities of conflict with evolution: validation of the scales of evolutionary conflict measure (SECM).

Authors:  Gena C Sbeglia; Ross H Nehm
Journal:  Evolution (N Y)       Date:  2020-11-23

8.  Practices and Perspectives of College Instructors on Addressing Religious Beliefs When Teaching Evolution.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Barnes; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.