| Literature DB >> 22956932 |
Josh E Schroeder1, Yair Barzilay, Amir Hasharoni, Leon Kaplan.
Abstract
STUDYEntities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22956932 PMCID: PMC3427965 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Spine Care J ISSN: 1663-7976
Fig 1Preoperative image of a child after being placed on the operating table; note two silicon rolls lowering pressures from the chest.
Fig 2Preoperative x-ray of the spine in the kyphotic area.
Fig 3The spine after the kyphectomy, placement of rods and wires.
Fig 4Postoperative x-rays of the spine.
Fig 5The child 2 years postoperatively.
Fig 6X-ray of the spine; 2 years postoperative fusion is seen at the level of the kyphosis.
Fig 7Model showing placement of rods.


Fig 9View from underneath.
Fig 10Final result.
Patients demographics, surgical characteristics, and length of follow-up for 13 consecutive patients.
| Patient No. | Age at surgery, y | Sex | Preoperative Cobb angle, degrees | Level of fixation | Katz score change | Follow up, mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | F | 95 | Thoracic 4-sacrum | 1 | 125 |
| 2 | 7 | F | 100 | Thoracic 3-sacrum | 2 | 120 |
| 3 | 12 | M | 110 | Thoracic 3-sacrum | 1 | 110 |
| 4 | 8 | M | 130 | Thoracic 2-sacrum | 2 | 110 |
| 5 | 9 | M | 120 | Thoracic 2-sacrum | 3 | 90 |
| 6 | 12 | M | 90 | Thoracic 3-sacrum | 2 | 87 |
| 7 | 17 | M | 115 | Thoracic 3-sacrum | 2 | 75 |
| 8 | 8 | F | 110 | Thoracic 4-sacrum | 1 | 73 |
| 9 | 5 | M | 108 | Thoracic 5-sacrum | 1 | 60 |
| 10 | 4.5 | M | 105 | Thoracic 5-sacrum | 0 | 55 |
| 11 | 8 | M | 110 | Thoracic 2-sacrum | 2 | 90 |
| 12 | 7 | M | 110 | Thoracic 3-sacrum | 2 | 36 |
| 13 | 10 | F | 95 | Thoracic 4-sacrum | 2 | 36 |
Method of fixation and complication rates comparing this study to other studies evaluating surgical fixation in patients with myelomeningocele.
| Study | No. of patients in study | Method of fixation | Rate of complication, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current study | 13 | Posterior | 38 |
| Ko et al (2007) | 9 | 7 posterior, 2 anterior and posterior | 89 |
| Keessen et al (1992) | 61 | Posterior, anterior and posterior | 73 |
| Kocaoglu et al (2008) | 7 | Posterior | 29 |
| McCall (1998) | 16 | Posterior | 50 |
| Odent et al (2004) | 9 | Anterior | 44 |
| Lintner and Lindseth (1994) | 34 | Posterior | 50 |
| Niall et al (2004) | 24 | 22 posterior, 2 anterior and posterior | 83 |
| Methods evaluation and class of evidence (CoE) | |
|---|---|
| Study design: | |
| Prospective cohort | |
| Retrospective cohort | |
| Case control | |
| Case series | • |
| Methods | |
| Patients at similar point in course of treatment | • |
| Follow-up ≥ 85% | • |
| Similarity of treatment protocols for patient groups | • |
| Patients followed-up long enough for outcomes to occur | |
| Control for extraneous risk factors | |
| IV | |
| The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 63. | |