Oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) activates dendritic cells (DCs), thereby initiating inflammation responses in atherosclerosis, yet the modulatory mechanisms remain unclear. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulators for DC functions. This study evaluated the regulation by miRNAs of the ox-LDL-induced DC immune response. In CD11c(+) DCs from ApoE-deficient mice with hyperlipidemia, microRNA miR-181a was significantly up-regulated. In cultured bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs), ox-LDL promoted DC maturation and up-regulated miR-181a expression. Abundance of miR-181a attenuated ox-LDL-induced CD83 and CD40 expression, inhibited the secretion of interleukin (IL)-6 and TNF-α, and up-regulated IL-10, an important anti-inflammatory cytokine that was inhibited by ox-LDL. Inhibition of the endogenous miR-181a reversed the effects on CD83 and CD40 as well as the effects on IL-6 and TNF-α. The putative target genes of miR-181a were evaluated by gene ontology assessment, and the c-Fos-mediated inflammation pathway was identified. miR-181a targeted the 3' untranslated region of c-Fos mRNA by luciferase experiments. Thus, abundance of miR-181a reduced c-Fos protein, whereas inhibition of miR-181a increased c-Fos protein in BMDCs. We therefore suggest that miR-181a attenuates ox-LDL-stimulated immune inflammation responses by targeting c-Fos in DCs.
Oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) activates dendritic cells (DCs), thereby initiating inflammation responses in atherosclerosis, yet the modulatory mechanisms remain unclear. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulators for DC functions. This study evaluated the regulation by miRNAs of the ox-LDL-induced DC immune response. In CD11c(+) DCs from ApoE-deficient mice with hyperlipidemia, microRNA miR-181a was significantly up-regulated. In cultured bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs), ox-LDL promoted DC maturation and up-regulated miR-181a expression. Abundance of miR-181a attenuated ox-LDL-induced CD83 and CD40 expression, inhibited the secretion of interleukin (IL)-6 and TNF-α, and up-regulated IL-10, an important anti-inflammatory cytokine that was inhibited by ox-LDL. Inhibition of the endogenous miR-181a reversed the effects on CD83 and CD40 as well as the effects on IL-6 and TNF-α. The putative target genes of miR-181a were evaluated by gene ontology assessment, and the c-Fos-mediated inflammation pathway was identified. miR-181a targeted the 3' untranslated region of c-Fos mRNA by luciferase experiments. Thus, abundance of miR-181a reduced c-Fos protein, whereas inhibition of miR-181a increased c-Fos protein in BMDCs. We therefore suggest that miR-181a attenuates ox-LDL-stimulated immune inflammation responses by targeting c-Fos in DCs.
Atherosclerosis, the foremost cause of coronary heart disease, is a multifactorial and
multistep disease. Chronic inflammation triggered by an autoimmune response toward the
accumulated oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) is involved in atherosclerotic process, from initiation
to progression and, eventually, plaque rupture. Dendritic cells (DCs) are the only
“professional” and most powerful antigen-presenting cells in the inflammatory
response. In atherosclerotic lesions, DCs accumulate in the subendothelium and undergo
maturation stimulated by ox-LDL (1, 2), advanced glycosylation end products (3), or other antigen components. The maturation of DCs
is characterized by increased secretion of cytokines; up-regulation of surface molecules
such as CD80, CD86, and CD40; and enhanced efficiency in stimulating the differentiation of
effector CD4+ T cells from naive T-cell precursors (4).Recently, negative immune regulatory functions of DCs in atherosclerosis have been
reported. For example, apolipoprotein B-100-loaded DCs present a tolerogenic phenotype and
attenuate atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemicmice (5). In another study, oral administration of an active form of vitamin D3
(calcitriol) decreased atherosclerosis in ApoE−/−
mice (6). Our group has recently reported that
salvianolic acid B effectively suppressed ox-LDL-induced DC maturation through peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor γ activation (7). Nevertheless, until now, the process of differentiation of immature DCs to
mature DCs (proinflammation) or tolerogenic DCs (regulatory DCs, negatively regulating
inflammation) has remained unclear.Recent studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) regulate the immune functions of DCs and
are involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (8). miRNAs represent a class of naturally occurring, small, noncoding RNAs.
Single-stranded miRNAs bind to the 3′ untranslated region (3′-UTR) of target
mRNAs and consequently decrease protein translation, increase degradation of the target
message RNA, or both. In atherosclerosis, miRNAs miR-21 and miR-10a regulate neointimal
lesion formation (9, 10), miR-146 and miR-155 regulate the inflammatory response in
ox-LDL-stimulated macrophages (11), and miR-26a
and miR-100 regulate the neovascularization and smooth muscle cell functions (12). For DC immune functions, regulation by miRNAs
includes the capturing of the antigen via Toll-like receptors, the processing and
presenting of antigen to T cells (such as by miR-148 and miR-152), etc. (13, 14).
However, whether miRNAs have a regulatory role in DCs that affects the development of
atherosclerosis has not been addressed.The purpose of this study was to investigate the regulation by miRNAs of the DC-mediated
immune inflammatory response stimulated by ox-LDL in the process of atherosclerosis.
METHODS
Animals and CD11c+ DCs
ApoE-deficient mice
(ApoE) were purchased
from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine). Female
ApoEmice at 8
weeks of age were fed a control diet (ND) or a Western high-fat diet (HD; 21% fat,
0.15% cholesterol) for 2 weeks.
ApoEmice were
anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane (5% for induction, 1% for maintenance) for
blood collection and euthanized by CO2 inhalation. The spleens were
crushed, and the purified CD11c+ DCs were positively selected with
anti-CD11c+ microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergish Gladbach,
Germany). C57BL/6 mice for culture of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs)
were also anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane (5% for induction, 1% for
maintenance) and euthanized by CO2 inhalation. The adequacy of anesthesia
was determined by the loss of a pedal withdrawal reflex and any other reaction from
the animal in response to pinching the toe, tail, or ear of the animal. The
respiration rate of the animal under anesthesia was closely monitored, and an
increased respiration rate was used as a sign that anesthesia was too light. All
procedures and protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University and Shanghai Institutes for Biological
Sciences-CAS (A5894-01) and were conducted in conformity with the Public Health
Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
miRNA microarray analysis
Real-time PCR for microRNAs was performed using the miRCURY LNA Universal RT microRNA
PCR system and microRNA Ready-to-Use PCR Panel-I (mouse) (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Details are provided in the online
supplement, miRNA microarray analysis.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The
expression levels of miRNAs were determined by using specific primers and probes
according to the manufacturer's protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA),
and U6 was used as an internal control. For quantitative RT-PCR analyses, we used a
SYBR RT-PCR kit (Takara, Dalian, China). The primers for the genes for c-Fos,
interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-12b, tumornecrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon
(IFN)-γ, and GAPDH are listed in supplementary Table I. The relative expression
levels of the genes were normalized to that of GAPDH by using the
2−ΔΔCt cycle threshold method.
Cell culture
BMDCs were from C57BL/6 mice. Bone marrow progenitors were cultured in medium
containing 10 ng/ml granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and 1 ng/ml
IL-4. Nonadherent cells were gently washed out at 24 h. The remaining loosely
adherent clusters were cultured, and the medium was changed every 2 days. On day 7,
the cells were collected for ox-LDL treatment (48 h, 50 μg/ml) or transfection.
The ox-LDL was purchased from Peking Union-Biology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). For
detailed preparation methods, LDL from fresh human plasma was isolated, which has
tested negative for hepatitis C, HIV-1, and HIV-II antibodies as well as hepatitis
surface antigens after series ultracentrifugartion (density, 1.03–1.50). LDL
was then oxidized using 10 μM Cu2So4 (oxidant) in PBS. Oxidation is terminated by
adding excess EDTA. Each is analyzed on agarose gel electrophoresis for migration
LDL.
Cell transfection
Cells were transfected with miR-181a precursor or inhibitor at 30 or 100 nM,
respectively (Applied Biosystems). BMDCs (5 × 105) were seeded in
each well of 6-well plates. The cells were mixed with 100 µl of OptiMEM (Gibco,
Grand Island, NY), transferred to a 4-mm cuvette (Molecular Bioproducts, San Diego,
CA), and pulsed in a GenePulser Xcell (400 V, 150 µF, 100 Ω) (Bio-Rad,
Hercules, CA) (15). The cells were
transferred to RPMI-1640 medium, and 1 h later and an equal amount of RPMI-1640 plus
20% FBS was added. A scrambled oligonucleotide (GenePharm, Shanghai, China) was used
as a control. The cell viability has been examined by propidium iodide staining of
nonviable cells.
Flow cytometry
Adherent cells were harvested and counterstained immune-phenotypically using
anti-CD83, anti-CD80, anti-CD86, anti-CD40, and anti-IAd (BD Pharmingen, San Diego,
CA).
Western blotting
The protein levels of c-Fos and GAPDH were determined by Western
blot analysis using specific antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA).
ELISA assay
The culture supernatant was analyzed for TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 with ELISA kits
(R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).
Plasmids
The 3′-UTRs of c-Fos mRNA harboring the predicted miR-181a
binding sequences were PCR amplified from mouse genomic DNA and cloned into
HindIII and SpeI of the pMir-Report luciferase
vector (Ambion, Austin, TX) to generate the c-Fos-3′-UTR
reporter construct. Mutagenesis of predicted targets with a deletion of 7 bp from the
site of perfect complementarity was performed using a site-directed Mutagenesis Kit
(Takara). The primers are listed in supplementary Table I.
Luciferase assay
Two hundred nanograms of plasmid DNA (wt-Luc-c-Fos
or mu-Luc-c-Fos) plus miR-181a precursor, miR-181a
inhibitor, or a unrelated miRNA, miR-518b or scrambled oligonucleotide were
transfected. The pSV-β-galactosidase plasmid was cotransfected with the
luciferase reporter vectors to normalize the transfection efficiency. Forty-eight
hours after transfection, luciferase activity was measured using the luciferase assay
system (Ambion). Five replicates were performed.
In silico analysis
We identified the genes putatively targeted by miR-181a using TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org)
(16) and miRanda (http://www.microrna.org) (17). The KEGG pathways and gene ontology (GO)
hierarchial categories analyses were carried out using the Capitalbio server
(http://bioinfo.capitalbio.com/mas3/) (18).
The Genes Regulatory Network was constructed using Cytoscape software (19).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of differences. One-way ANOVA
followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test or Mann-Whitney U test was used
to calculate P values. P < 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
RESULTS
CD11c+ DCs from ApoE−/− mice with hyperlipidemia had
increased inflammatory response and up-regulated miR-181a expression
ApoE−/− mice (8 weeks of age) were fed a ND
or HD. Consumption of HD for 2 weeks significantly increased the circulating total
cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in the mice (supplementary Table II). We observed
significantly enhanced expression of CD83 and CD40 and a marginal increase of CD80
and CD86 in CD11c+ DCs from the spleens of the HDmice (). In addition, the
expression of the TNF-α and IL-6 was significantly increased in
CD11c+ DCs (Fig. 1B). These
data indicated activation of the immune inflammatory response by DCs in
ApoE−/− mice with high lipidemia.
Fig. 1.
Increased inflammation and miR-181a expression in CD11c+ DCs
from ApoE mice with
hyperlipidemia. A: Flow cytometric analysis of the immune phenotypes of the
spleen CD11c+ DCs. CD83 and CD40 were up-regulated in HD mice.
The percentage of positive cells is presented. *P <
0.05. B: Expression of inflammatory cytokines by real-time RT-PCR in spleen
CD11c+ DCs. Results are shown as relative mRNA expression.
*P < 0.05. C: Verification of miR-181a expression
in CD11c+ DCs by real-time PCR. *P <
0.05.
Increased inflammation and miR-181a expression in CD11c+ DCs
from ApoEmice with
hyperlipidemia. A: Flow cytometric analysis of the immune phenotypes of the
spleen CD11c+ DCs. CD83 and CD40 were up-regulated in HDmice.
The percentage of positive cells is presented. *P <
0.05. B: Expression of inflammatory cytokines by real-time RT-PCR in spleen
CD11c+ DCs. Results are shown as relative mRNA expression.
*P < 0.05. C: Verification of miR-181a expression
in CD11c+ DCs by real-time PCR. *P <
0.05.The miRNA expression profile of the CD11c+ DCs was screened using
miRNA PCR array. miR-181a was significantly increased approximately 3-fold in HDmice
(Fig. 1C). Several other miRNAs were also
significantly altered in CD11c+ DCs of HDmice (data not shown).
Because previous studies have showed that miR-181a regulates the T-cell immune
inflammatory response (20, 21), we then asked whether miR-181a regulates
ox-LDL-stimulated inflammatory response in DCs.
miR-181a inhibited the ox-LDL-induced DC immune inflammatory response
In cultured BMDCs, ox-LDL treatment produced an activated phenotype consisting of
elongated cell morphology (supplementary Fig. I); up-regulated DC maturation markers
such as CD83, CD40, CD80, and CD86 (); and increased inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-a,
IL-12p40, IL-1, IL-6, and IFN-γ (Fig.
2B). In this model, ox-LDL increased the expression of miR-181a approximately
4-fold (supplementary Fig. II).
Fig. 2.
miR-181a inhibited the ox-LDL-induced immune inflammatory response in BMDCs. A:
Expression of cell-surface CD80, CD83, CD86, CD40, and I-Ad as determined by
flow cytometry of BMDCs (n = 5). *ox-LDL versus control;
P < 0.05. +miR-181a-pre versus control;
P < 0.05. #ox-LDL plus miR-181a-pre
versus ox-LDL; P < 0.05. &ox-LDL plus
miR-181a-inh versus ox-LDL; P < 0.05. B: Expression of the
cytokines in BMDCs analyzed by real-time RT-PCR (n = 5). *ox-LDL
versus control; P < 0.05. +miR-181a-pre
versus control; P < 0.05. #ox-LDL plus
miR-181a-pre versus ox-LDL; P < 0.05.
&ox-LDL plus miR-181a-inh versus ox-LDL; P <
0.05. C: Expression of cytokines in BMDCs analyzed by ELISA (n = 5).
*ox-LDL versus control; P < 0.05.
+miR-181a-pre versus control; P < 0.05.
#ox-LDL plus miR-181a-pre versus ox-LDL; P
< 0.05. &ox-LDL plus miR-181a-inh versus ox-LDL;
P < 0.05.
miR-181a inhibited the ox-LDL-induced immune inflammatory response in BMDCs. A:
Expression of cell-surface CD80, CD83, CD86, CD40, and I-Ad as determined by
flow cytometry of BMDCs (n = 5). *ox-LDL versus control;
P < 0.05. +miR-181a-pre versus control;
P < 0.05. #ox-LDL plus miR-181a-pre
versus ox-LDL; P < 0.05. &ox-LDL plus
miR-181a-inh versus ox-LDL; P < 0.05. B: Expression of the
cytokines in BMDCs analyzed by real-time RT-PCR (n = 5). *ox-LDL
versus control; P < 0.05. +miR-181a-pre
versus control; P < 0.05. #ox-LDL plus
miR-181a-pre versus ox-LDL; P < 0.05.
&ox-LDL plus miR-181a-inh versus ox-LDL; P <
0.05. C: Expression of cytokines in BMDCs analyzed by ELISA (n = 5).
*ox-LDL versus control; P < 0.05.
+miR-181a-pre versus control; P < 0.05.
#ox-LDL plus miR-181a-pre versus ox-LDL; P
< 0.05. &ox-LDL plus miR-181a-inh versus ox-LDL;
P < 0.05.The transfection efficiency of miRNAs into BMDCs was high (supplementary Fig. III).
MiR-181a overabundance down-regulated CD83 and CD40 and suppressed the ox-LDL-induced
up-regulation of CD83 and CD40 (Fig. 2A). We
also observed moderately inhibitory effects on CD86 and CD80 by miR-181a overbundance
(Fig. 2A). Furthermore, inhibiting
endogenous miR-181a by transfection of miR-181a inhibitor further increased
ox-LDL-induced CD83 and CD40 expression (Fig.
2A).For the cytokines, miR-181a overabundance inhibited TNF-α and IL-6 expression
and attenuated the ox-LDL-induced TNF-α and IL-6 expression (Fig. 2B). In addition, IL-10, an important
anti-inflammatory cytokine that was decreased by ox-LDL, was significantly increased
by miR-181a (Fig. 2B). To support these data,
inhibition of the endogenous miR-181a showed the reversed effects of miR-181a to
TNF-α and IL-6. The altered cytokine levels were further verified by ELISA,
which showed a consistent regulation by ox-LDL or miR-181a of cytokine expression
(Fig. 2C).
In silico analysis of the target mRNAs by miR-181a
Based on miR-181a's putative targets, we undertook GO and pathway analysis of
those genes. Among the most highly enriched GO results for miR-181a were antigen
processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen, positive regulation of
T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity,IL-10 production, positive regulation of the I-κB
kinase/NF-κB cascade, and IL-12 production (, left panel). Among the most significant pathways
were T-cell receptor signaling, cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions, natural
killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, the TGF-β signaling pathway, and the
Toll-like receptor signaling pathway (Fig. 3A,
right panel).
Fig. 3.
In silico analysis of target mRNAs for miR-181a. A: Significant GO (left panel)
and pathway (right panel) genes for miR-181a. The vertical axis is the GO
category or the pathway name, and the horizontal axis is the enrichment of GO
or pathway. B: The gene interaction networks of the genes involved in
inflammation and putatively targeted by miR-181a. Edges describe the
connectivity (indegree or outdegree) and the interaction effects of the gene
with other genes. ACT (+P), activation phosphorylation; ACT (−P),
activation dephosphorylation indirect effect; BIND, binding/association; COMP,
compound; EXP, expression; IND, inhibition; INH, inhibition dephosphorylation.
The gene Fos is distinctive with higher in-degree and
out-degree values in the network.
In silico analysis of target mRNAs for miR-181a. A: Significant GO (left panel)
and pathway (right panel) genes for miR-181a. The vertical axis is the GO
category or the pathway name, and the horizontal axis is the enrichment of GO
or pathway. B: The gene interaction networks of the genes involved in
inflammation and putatively targeted by miR-181a. Edges describe the
connectivity (indegree or outdegree) and the interaction effects of the gene
with other genes. ACT (+P), activation phosphorylation; ACT (−P),
activation dephosphorylation indirect effect; BIND, binding/association; COMP,
compound; EXP, expression; IND, inhibition; INH, inhibition dephosphorylation.
The gene Fos is distinctive with higher in-degree and
out-degree values in the network.We then constructed a gene interaction network based on the genes in the immune
inflammatory response targeted by miR-181a. The details of the gene names, the number
of interactive genes, and the attributed pathways are listed in supplementary Table
III. In the network, the most elementary characteristic of a node is its degree
(connectivity; i.e., the number of the links the node has to other nodes) (20). The TNF-α node had the highest
degree of 24 (in-degree of 11 and out-degree of 13; Fig. 3B and supplementary Table III). c-Fos was also
worthy of attention, with an in-degree of 12 and an out-degree of 9. Because previous
studies have suggested that c-Fos has an important role in
DC-related immune functions (22, 23), we then asked whether it could be a
crucial target gene for miR-181a in ox-LDL-stimulated DCs.
miR-181a targets c-Fos in ox-LDL-stimulated BMDCs
To ascertain whether miR-181a regulates c-Fos, we harvested BMDCs
treated with ox-LDL and transfected them with miR-181a precursor or miR-181a
inhibitor. miR-181a overabundance significantly inhibited c-Fos
expression, whereas inhibition of endogenous miR-181a up-regulated c-Fos protein
expression, as shown by Western blot (). Ox-LDL enhanced the expression of c-Fos, but this effect was
attenuated significantly by miR-181a overabundance (Fig. 4B). Inhibition of endogenous miR-181a significantly reversed the
effects of miR-181a to c-Fos (Fig. 4B). We
also examined the c-Fos expression in splenocytes CD11c+DC and
observed significantly up-regulated expression of c-Fos in HDmice compared with the
NDmice (supplementary Fig. IV).
Fig. 4.
c-Fos is a target gene for miR-181a. A: Representative
immunoblot analyses of c-Fos transfected with miR-181a
precursor or inhibitor (n = 5). *miR-181a-pre versus control;
P < 0.05. #miR-181a-inh versus control;
P < 0.05. B: Representative immunoblot analyses of
c-Fos from BMDCs treated with ox-LDL and transfected with
miR-181a precursor or inhibitor (n = 5). +ox-LDL versus
control; P < 0.05. *miR-181a-pre+ox-LDL versus
ox-LDL; P < 0.05. #miR-181a-inh+ox-LDL
versus ox-LDL; P < 0.05. C: Luciferase reporter constructs
containing the wild-type or mutated 3′-UTR of mouse
c-Fos mRNA were transfected into HEK 293 cells. The
sequence in italic and gray background indicates the predicted binding site for
miR-181a. The sequence of miR-181a is shown aligned with its predicted target
site in the 3′-UTR of c-Fos mRNA from the indicated
species. The sequence of the mutated (Mu) 3′-UTR of mouse
c-Fos mRNA is also shown. D: Luciferase reporter constructs
containing the wild-type or mutated 3′-UTR of mice c-Fos
mRNA was transfected into HEK 293 cells. Luciferase activity was normalized to
the activity obtained with a β-galactosidase vector and is expressed as
relative luciferase activity (n = 5). * miR-181a plus 3-UTR (WT)
versus control; P < 0.05.
c-Fos is a target gene for miR-181a. A: Representative
immunoblot analyses of c-Fos transfected with miR-181a
precursor or inhibitor (n = 5). *miR-181a-pre versus control;
P < 0.05. #miR-181a-inh versus control;
P < 0.05. B: Representative immunoblot analyses of
c-Fos from BMDCs treated with ox-LDL and transfected with
miR-181a precursor or inhibitor (n = 5). +ox-LDL versus
control; P < 0.05. *miR-181a-pre+ox-LDL versus
ox-LDL; P < 0.05. #miR-181a-inh+ox-LDL
versus ox-LDL; P < 0.05. C: Luciferase reporter constructs
containing the wild-type or mutated 3′-UTR of mousec-Fos mRNA were transfected into HEK 293 cells. The
sequence in italic and gray background indicates the predicted binding site for
miR-181a. The sequence of miR-181a is shown aligned with its predicted target
site in the 3′-UTR of c-Fos mRNA from the indicated
species. The sequence of the mutated (Mu) 3′-UTR of mousec-Fos mRNA is also shown. D: Luciferase reporter constructs
containing the wild-type or mutated 3′-UTR of micec-Fos
mRNA was transfected into HEK 293 cells. Luciferase activity was normalized to
the activity obtained with a β-galactosidase vector and is expressed as
relative luciferase activity (n = 5). * miR-181a plus 3-UTR (WT)
versus control; P < 0.05.We then used the computational approaches to identify the miRNA target sequences
based on complementarity to the miRNA seed region, favorable sequence context,
stability of the miRNA-mRNA duplex, and conservation across multiple species (Fig. 4C). A construct containing the 3′-UTR
of c-Fos mRNA or the sequence with the mutant seed region was
cotransfected along with miR-181a or a negative control miRNA into HEK 293 cells.
Cotransfection of the nonmutated construct with miR-181a precursors resulted in a
significant reduction in luciferase activity (Fig.
4D). This effect was specific because no change was seen in luciferase
reporter activity with transfection of the mutated construct (Fig. 4D).
DISCUSSION
The major findings of this study are that miR-181a was up-regulated under conditions of
hyperlipidemia. Increased miR-181a attenuated the ox-LDL-induced DC immune inflammatory
response through down-regulating DC maturation surface markers, regulating the
inflammatory cytokines. In addition, miR-181a targets a network of inflammation-related
genes, and miR-181a represses the expression of c-Fos, a crucial
inflammatory transcription factor. Thus, miR-181a negatively regulates the
ox-LDL-induced immune inflammatory response in DCs.Previous studies have showed that dyslipidemia accelerates the immune inflammatory
response in atherosclerosis (24, 25). In this study, we consistently observed an
increased inflammatory response in spleen DCs from mice having an elevated lipid
profile. In addition, miR-181a was abnormally up-regulated in spleen
CD11c+ DCs. MiR-181a had been reported to be an intrinsic modulator
of T-cell sensitivity and selection (19) and to
control the strength of T-cell antigen receptor signaling during T-cell maturation
(20). The level of miR-181a has been
correlated with the expression of genes involved in the immune and inflammatory
responses, such as IRF7 and TLR4 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (26). We thus evaluated the potential regulation of
miR-181a to the ox-LDL-stimulated DC immune inflammatory response.From functional experiments, we found that miR-181a inhibited the expression of CD83 and
CD40 in cultured BMDCs and ox-LDL-stimulated BMDCs and that inhibition of the endogenous
miR-181a reversed the effects to these two molecules. In addition, miR-181a produced a
modest decrease in the expression of the costimulatory molecules (CD80/CD86). All CD83,
CD40, and CD80/CD86 are characteristic surface markers for fully matured DCs. Evidence
can be found for these molecules as regulatory targets in immune homeostasis for
DC-T-cell interactions (27). CD83 is
preferentially expressed on mature DCs, and blockage of CD83 inhibits T-cell
inflammatory responses (28). CD40 is a member
of the TNF receptor family. By binding to its ligand (CD40L), which is transiently
expressed on T cells under inflammatory conditions, the CD40/CD40L complex promotes the
development of the T-cell immune response (29).
Thus, our results indicates that miR-181a can attenuate DC-T-cell interactions by
down-regulating DC surface maturation molecules.The activation and polarization of the Th1-cell inflammatory response is a complex
process involving the up-regulation of DCs surface markers and a corresponding increase
in Th1 proinflammatory cytokines. This attenuation of miR-181a to DC-T interaction was
further supported by the regulation of miR-181a to the inflammatory cytokine expression.
In our study, ox-LDL increased the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and
TNF-α but decreased the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (30, 31). In contrast,
miR-181a down-regulated IL-6 and TNF-α and inhibited the ox-LDL-induced increase
in IL-6 and TNF-α in BMDCs. These effects were reversed when inhibiting the
endogenous miR-181a.In our study, miR-181a significantly increased IL-10 expression. Previous reports showed
that down-regulating DC surface markers and Th1 inflammatory cytokines but increasing
IL-10 drive the differentiation of naive T cells to Treg cells (32). Treg cells have been reported to induce and maintain T-cell
tolerance and to play a protective role in atherosclerosis (33, 34). Our data
indicated that miR-181a might promote Treg cell production to help maintain immune
atherosclerosis. This point is worthy of further investigation.The regulation of miR-181a to DCs was also supported in GO and pathway analysis because
most of the genes targeted by miR-181a are involved in the immune and inflammatory
responses. In addition, c-Fos was especially distinctive in the gene
interaction network based on the identified genes. c-Fos protein
functions as one subunit of a complex of dimeric transcription factors collectively
referred to as activating protein 1 (AP-1). Up-regulation of c-Fos is
involved in LPS-induced up-regulation of MHC-II and IL-12p19 expression in DCs (35). Increased AP-1 was also involved in the
process of minimally oxidized LDL-activating macrophages (36). In atherosclerosis, c-Fos was localized to
plaques and was up-regulated in circulating monocytes from patients with coronary heart
disease (37). Based on these data, we evaluated
the potential functions of c-Fos in ox-LDL-stimulated BMDCs regulated by miR-181a.Our results revealed that miR-181a repressed the expression of c-Fos
and that the inhibition of endogenous miR-181a reversed this effect. In addition, the
results of the in silico analysis and the luciferance assay suggested that miR-181a
targeted the 3′-UTR of c-Fos mRNA to produce its
post-transcriptional inhibitory function. Therefore, we suggested that the inhibition of
c-Fos by miR-181a is a potentially novel mechanism contributing to
immune homeostasis in the hypercholesterol-associated inflammatory response in
atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, previous studies have also reported that
c-Fos dampens the production of IFN-β and IL-12 in DCs
stimulated by LPS (38) and that miR-155
inhibited the DC immune inflammatory response through up-regulating c-Fos expression.
One potential explanation might be the differences in AP-1 complexes because of the
different stimulation of LPS or ox-LDL (39).In summary, we suggest that miR-181a feedback attenuates the ox-LDL-stimulated immune
inflammatory response by targeting c-Fos in DCs (). Thus, miR-181a may be a new therapeutic
target for ox-LDL-stimulated immune inflammation in atherosclerosis. Further elucidation
of the antiatherogenic effects of miR-181a inhibition to DC immune response in
atherosclerosis in vivo will lead to the in-depth understanding of the significance
miRNA-regulated immunoinflammatory response in atherosclerosis.
Fig. 5.
Ox-LDL stimulates DCs to up-regulate the proinflammatory genes and to increase
miR-181a expression. Meanwhile, miR-181a feedback blocks the ox-LDL induced
inflammatory response by inhibiting the proinflammatory transcription factor of
c-Fos. Thus, miR-181a promotes the production of Treg cells mediated potentially
through increased IL-10 expression.
Ox-LDL stimulates DCs to up-regulate the proinflammatory genes and to increase
miR-181a expression. Meanwhile, miR-181a feedback blocks the ox-LDL induced
inflammatory response by inhibiting the proinflammatory transcription factor of
c-Fos. Thus, miR-181a promotes the production of Treg cells mediated potentially
through increased IL-10 expression.
Authors: Yun Fang; Congzhu Shi; Elisabetta Manduchi; Mete Civelek; Peter F Davies Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Philipp Wiesner; Soo-Ho Choi; Felicidad Almazan; Christopher Benner; Wendy Huang; Cody J Diehl; Ayelet Gonen; Susan Butler; Joseph L Witztum; Christopher K Glass; Yury I Miller Journal: Circ Res Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Kim L L Habets; Gijs H M van Puijvelde; Leonie M van Duivenvoorde; Eva J A van Wanrooij; Paula de Vos; Jan-Willem Cohen Tervaert; Theo J C van Berkel; Rene E M Toes; Johan Kuiper Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Anna Maria Lavezzi; José Milei; Daniel R Grana; Federica Flenda; Aldo Basellini; Luigi Matturri Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Bino John; Anton J Enright; Alexei Aravin; Thomas Tuschl; Chris Sander; Debora S Marks Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2004-10-05 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Ioanna Andreadou; Hector A Cabrera-Fuentes; Yvan Devaux; Nikolaos G Frangogiannis; Stefan Frantz; Tomasz Guzik; Elisa A Liehn; Clarissa P C Gomes; Rainer Schulz; Derek J Hausenloy Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 10.787