BACKGROUND: The efffectiveness of tuberculosis (TB) contact screening programmes using interferon γ release assays remains uncertain as prospective contact TB risk is not well characterised. OBJECTIVES: To quantify 2-year TB risk and evaluate screening performance with single-step QuantiFERON TB Gold-In Tube (QFT) in adult contacts. To compare TB risk between QFT tested subgroups stratified by exposure type (smear positive pulmonary (SP) versus non-smear positive (NSP) TB) and age (younger (16-35 years) versus older (≥36 years)). METHODS: Screening involved QFT testing in older contacts of SP and all younger contacts, 8-12 weeks after index notification. Chemoprevention (3RH) was offered to QFT positive (+) younger adults. TB risk was determined in a prospective cohort study. RESULTS: 43 TB events occurred in 1769 adult contacts observed for median 717 days (2-year rate (95% CI)=2·5% (1.7 to 3.2)). Index-contact strain matching was demonstrable for 18 of 22 (82%) paired samples. No contacts (0/98) receiving 3RH developed TB. 215 of 817 appropriately tested adults (26.3%) were QFT+. 14 of 112 untreated QFT+ adults developed TB (2-year rate (95% CI)=13·4% (7.7 to 21.1)). The model required 35 contacts screened with QFT to identify one contact developing TB at 2 years. TB rates were comparable in QFT+ contacts of SP and NSP (rate ratio (RR)=0.98, p=0·962). For QFT+ older contacts, the disease rate was lower (8.9% (3.3 to 19.1)) and similar to the overall group rate (RR=1.4, p=0.503). CONCLUSIONS: QFT based single-step contact screening is effective in young adults.
BACKGROUND: The efffectiveness of tuberculosis (TB) contact screening programmes using interferon γ release assays remains uncertain as prospective contact TB risk is not well characterised. OBJECTIVES: To quantify 2-year TB risk and evaluate screening performance with single-step QuantiFERON TB Gold-In Tube (QFT) in adult contacts. To compare TB risk between QFT tested subgroups stratified by exposure type (smear positive pulmonary (SP) versus non-smear positive (NSP) TB) and age (younger (16-35 years) versus older (≥36 years)). METHODS: Screening involved QFT testing in older contacts of SP and all younger contacts, 8-12 weeks after index notification. Chemoprevention (3RH) was offered to QFT positive (+) younger adults. TB risk was determined in a prospective cohort study. RESULTS: 43 TB events occurred in 1769 adult contacts observed for median 717 days (2-year rate (95% CI)=2·5% (1.7 to 3.2)). Index-contact strain matching was demonstrable for 18 of 22 (82%) paired samples. No contacts (0/98) receiving 3RH developed TB. 215 of 817 appropriately tested adults (26.3%) were QFT+. 14 of 112 untreated QFT+ adults developed TB (2-year rate (95% CI)=13·4% (7.7 to 21.1)). The model required 35 contacts screened with QFT to identify one contact developing TB at 2 years. TB rates were comparable in QFT+ contacts of SP and NSP (rate ratio (RR)=0.98, p=0·962). For QFT+ older contacts, the disease rate was lower (8.9% (3.3 to 19.1)) and similar to the overall group rate (RR=1.4, p=0.503). CONCLUSIONS: QFT based single-step contact screening is effective in young adults.
Authors: Jason R Andrews; Elisa Nemes; Michele Tameris; Bernard S Landry; Hassan Mahomed; J Bruce McClain; Helen A Fletcher; Willem A Hanekom; Robin Wood; Helen McShane; Thomas J Scriba; Mark Hatherill Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Marc Lipman; Mahdad Noursadeghi; Ibrahim Abubakar; Rishi K Gupta; Claire J Calderwood; Alexei Yavlinsky; Maria Krutikov; Matteo Quartagno; Maximilian C Aichelburg; Neus Altet; Roland Diel; Claudia C Dobler; Jose Dominguez; Joseph S Doyle; Connie Erkens; Steffen Geis; Pranabashis Haldar; Anja M Hauri; Thomas Hermansen; James C Johnston; Christoph Lange; Berit Lange; Frank van Leth; Laura Muñoz; Christine Roder; Kamila Romanowski; David Roth; Martina Sester; Rosa Sloot; Giovanni Sotgiu; Gerrit Woltmann; Takashi Yoshiyama; Jean-Pierre Zellweger; Dominik Zenner; Robert W Aldridge; Andrew Copas; Molebogeng X Rangaka Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Madhukar Pai; Claudia M Denkinger; Sandra V Kik; Molebogeng X Rangaka; Alice Zwerling; Olivia Oxlade; John Z Metcalfe; Adithya Cattamanchi; David W Dowdy; Keertan Dheda; Niaz Banaei Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Ibrahim Abubakar; Francis Drobniewski; Jo Southern; Alice J Sitch; Charlotte Jackson; Marc Lipman; Jonathan J Deeks; Chris Griffiths; Graham Bothamley; William Lynn; Helen Burgess; Bobby Mann; Ambreen Imran; Saranya Sridhar; Chuen-Yan Tsou; Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy; Melanie Rees-Roberts; Hilary Whitworth; Onn Min Kon; Pranab Haldar; Heinke Kunst; Sarah Anderson; Andrew Hayward; John M Watson; Heather Milburn; Ajit Lalvani Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 71.421