Literature DB >> 22956386

Peri-prosthetic hip infections: in favour of one-stage.

Thorsten Gehrke1, Daniel Kendoff.   

Abstract

Although it does offer certain obvious advantages, the one-staged revision approach in infected THA remains rare in the field of orthopaedics. Besides the reduced number of surgical interventions for patients, it is associated with a decreased inpatient hospital stay and quicker mobilisation. Furthermore, it might be the more cost-effective approach and enables a reduced duration of post-operative systemic antibiotics, usually less than 14 days in our setting. Technically speaking, the presence of a positive culture of a pre-operative aspiration and respective antibiogram are mandatory requirements. A general cemented implant fixation using topical antibiotics is the treatment of choice for single-staged procedures. The key to surgical success is based on the well-defined and detailed intra-hospital infrastructure, including a meticulous pre-operative hip aspiration regime, pre-operative planning and an aggressive intra-operative surgical approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22956386     DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  19 in total

Review 1.  Single- or two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hugh A C Leonard; Alexander D Liddle; Orlaith Burke; David W Murray; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Fiachra E Rowan; Matthew J Donaldson; Jurek R Pietrzak; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 3.  Low-Virulence Organisms and Periprosthetic Joint Infection-Biofilm Considerations of These Organisms.

Authors:  K Keely Boyle; Stuart Wood; T David Tarity
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

4.  Comment on: Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  Thorsten Gehrke; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  [Treatment of periprosthetic infections].

Authors:  L Renner; C Perka; A Trampuz; N Renz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  [Infected knee prostheses. Part 2: chronic late infections].

Authors:  P Herrmann; P Thoele; V Heppert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  [Infected knee prostheses. Part 1: early infection or acute hematogenous infection].

Authors:  P Herrmann; P Thoele; V Heppert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  One-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty: outcome of 39 consecutive hips.

Authors:  Thomas Ilchmann; Werner Zimmerli; Peter Emil Ochsner; Bernhard Kessler; Lukas Zwicky; Peter Graber; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  One-stage Revision With Catheter Infusion of Intraarticular Antibiotics Successfully Treats Infected THA.

Authors:  Leo A Whiteside; M E Roy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Re-Infection Outcomes following One- and Two-Stage Surgical Revision of Infected Hip Prosthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Michael R Whitehouse; Ashley W Blom; Andrew D Beswick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.