Literature DB >> 22956068

Microinvasive breast cancer: ER, PR, and HER-2/neu status and clinical outcomes after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy.

Danielle N Margalit1, Meera Sreedhara, Yu-Hui Chen, Paul J Catalano, Paul L Nguyen, Mehra Golshan, Beth A Overmoyer, Jay R Harris, Jane E Brock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contemporary clinical outcomes of microinvasive breast cancer (MIBC), defined as no focus >1 mm, are not well characterized. We document the immunophenotype, incidence of axillary metastases, and rate of recurrence in a well-defined case series.
METHODS: We reviewed 83 consecutive patients with MIBC from 1997 to 2005. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2/neu) receptor status were assessed. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR) and nodal/distant recurrence was calculated. Predictors of recurrence were identified and effect estimates determined.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (63%) underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and 31 (37%) underwent mastectomy. Sixty-one percent had ER-positive disease and 49% had HER-2/neu-positive disease. Three (4%) of 68 patients with sentinel node mapping or axillary dissection had single node micrometastases, and none had macrometastases or multiple nodes involved. Median follow-up was 6.4 years, with 6 LRs, 2 regional nodal recurrences, and 2 concurrent local/distant recurrences. The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence (local, nodal, or distant) was 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-13.4) for all patients, and among BCT patients, the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 4.2% (95% CI 0.7-12.7). HER-2/neu overexpression was not associated with recurrence (P = 0.46). Close/positive margins (≤2 mm) were significantly associated with an increased risk of LR after BCT or mastectomy (hazard ratio 8.8; 95% CI 1.6-48.8; P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: MIBC has a favorable prognosis, and HER-2/neu overexpression, although highly prevalent, is not significantly associated with recurrence. Axillary metastases at diagnosis are small and infrequent. The cumulative incidence of LR after BCT is acceptable; however, our data confirm that negative margins (>2 mm) are required for optimal BCT outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22956068     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2640-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

1.  Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Required for a Core Biopsy Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ with Microinvasion?

Authors:  Meghan R Flanagan; Michelle Stempel; Edi Brogi; Monica Morrow; Hiram S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Incidence, characteristics, and management of recently diagnosed, microscopically invasive breast cancer by receptor status: Iowa SEER 2000 to 2013.

Authors:  Alexandra Thomas; Ronald J Weigel; Charles F Lynch; Philip M Spanheimer; Elizabeth K Breitbach; Mary C Schroeder
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Nanoparticle Formulation of Indocyanine Green Improves Image-Guided Surgery in a Murine Model of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas E Wojtynek; Madeline T Olson; Timothy A Bielecki; Wei An; Aaqib M Bhat; Hamid Band; Scott R Lauer; Edibaldo Silva-Lopez; Aaron M Mohs
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Breast ductal Carcinoma in situ associated with microinvasion induces immunological response and predicts ipsilateral invasive recurrence.

Authors:  Xiao-Yang Chen; Aye Aye Thike; Valerie Cui Yun Koh; Nur Diyana Md Nasir; Boon Huat Bay; Puay Hoon Tan
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  The Demographic Features, Clinicopathological Characteristics and Cancer-specific Outcomes for Patients with Microinvasive Breast Cancer: A SEER Database Analysis.

Authors:  Wenna Wang; Wenjie Zhu; Feng Du; Yang Luo; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Microinvasive breast cancer and the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Sean M Hacking; Kara-Lynne Leonard; Dongling Wu; Mara Banks; Theresa Graves; Lijuan Wang; Evgeny Yakirevich; Yihong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive microinvasive breast carcinoma with a highly aggressive course: a case report.

Authors:  Cvetka Grasic Kuhar; Erika Matos
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-05-31

8.  Analysis of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes reveals two new biologically different subgroups of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Marie Beguinot; Marie-Melanie Dauplat; Fabrice Kwiatkowski; Guillaume Lebouedec; Lucie Tixier; Christophe Pomel; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Nina Radosevic-Robin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Microinvasive Carcinoma versus Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Comparison of Clinicopathological Features and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Milim Kim; Hyun Jeong Kim; Yul Ri Chung; Eunyoung Kang; Eun-Kyu Kim; Se Hyun Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; In Ah Kim; So Yeon Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Correlation of size and focality with prognosis in small breast carcinoma: a single institution case series.

Authors:  Mauro G Mastropasqua; Francesca Addante; Sara Pirola; Giuseppe Ingravallo; Giuseppe Viale
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.380

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.