Literature DB >> 22955907

When does computational imaging improve performance?

Oliver Cossairt1, Mohit Gupta, Shree K Nayar.   

Abstract

A number of computational imaging techniques are introduced to improve image quality by increasing light throughput. These techniques use optical coding to measure a stronger signal level. However, the performance of these techniques is limited by the decoding step, which amplifies noise. Although it is well understood that optical coding can increase performance at low light levels, little is known about the quantitative performance advantage of computational imaging in general settings. In this paper, we derive the performance bounds for various computational imaging techniques. We then discuss the implications of these bounds for several real-world scenarios (e.g., illumination conditions, scene properties, and sensor noise characteristics). Our results show that computational imaging techniques do not provide a significant performance advantage when imaging with illumination that is brighter than typical daylight. These results can be readily used by practitioners to design the most suitable imaging systems given the application at hand.

Year:  2012        PMID: 22955907     DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2012.2216538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process        ISSN: 1057-7149            Impact factor:   10.856


  6 in total

1.  Nonconvex compressive video sensing.

Authors:  Liangliang Chen; Ming Yan; Chunqi Qian; Ning Xi; Zhanxin Zhou; Yongliang Yang; Bo Song; Lixin Dong
Journal:  J Electron Imaging       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.945

2.  High-throughput fluorescence microscopy using multi-frame motion deblurring.

Authors:  Zachary F Phillips; Sarah Dean; Benjamin Recht; Laura Waller
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  High Resolution, Deep Imaging Using Confocal Time-of-Flight Diffuse Optical Tomography.

Authors:  Yongyi Zhao; Ankit Raghuram; Hyun K Kim; Andreas H Hielscher; Jacob T Robinson; Ashok Veeraraghavan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 9.322

4.  Vehicle autonomous localization in local area of coal mine tunnel based on vision sensors and ultrasonic sensors.

Authors:  Zirui Xu; Wei Yang; Kaiming You; Wei Li; Young-Il Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cortical Observation by Synchronous Multifocal Optical Sampling Reveals Widespread Population Encoding of Actions.

Authors:  Isaac V Kauvar; Timothy A Machado; Elle Yuen; John Kochalka; Minseung Choi; William E Allen; Gordon Wetzstein; Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Miniscope3D: optimized single-shot miniature 3D fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Kyrollos Yanny; Nick Antipa; William Liberti; Sam Dehaeck; Kristina Monakhova; Fanglin Linda Liu; Konlin Shen; Ren Ng; Laura Waller
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 17.782

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.