| Literature DB >> 22955640 |
Caerwyn Ash1, Kelvin Donne, Gwenaelle Daniel, Godfrey Town, Marc Clement, Ronan Valentine.
Abstract
The objective of this work is the investigation of intense pulsed light (IPL) photoepilation using Monte Carlo simulation to model the effect of the output dosimetry with millisecond exposure used by typical commercial IPL systems. The temporal pulse shape is an important parameter, which may affect the biological tissue response in terms of efficacy and adverse reactions. This study investigates the effect that IPL pulse structures, namely free discharge, square pulse, close, and spaced pulse stacking, has on hair removal. The relationship between radiant exposure distribution during the IPL pulse and chromophore heating is explored and modeled for hair follicles and the epidermis using a custom Monte Carlo computer simulation. Consistent square pulse and close pulse stacking delivery of radiant exposure across the IPL pulse is shown to generate the most efficient specific heating of the target chromophore, whilst sparing the epidermis, compared to free discharge and pulse stacking pulse delivery. Free discharge systems produced the highest epidermal temperature in the model. This study presents modeled thermal data of a hair follicle in situ, indicating that square pulse IPL technology may be the most efficient and the safest method for photoepilation. The investigation also suggests that the square pulse system design is the most efficient, as energy is not wasted during pulse exposure or lost through interpulse delay times of stacked pulses.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22955640 PMCID: PMC5718238 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys ISSN: 1526-9914 Impact factor: 2.102
Figure 1Time‐resolved spectral images of the four categories of IPL systems currently available (intensity is arbitrary).
Physical constants used for the various tissue layers used in this model.
|
| ρ |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epidermis | 0.5 | 1200 | 3600 | 1.34 | 0.789 |
| Dermis | 0.53 | 1200 | 3800 | 1.37 | 0.789 |
| Hair | 0.24 | 1210 | 3500 | 1.7 | 0.789 |
Figure 2Diagram depicting the Monte Carlo Model Cartesian geometry used.
Figure 3Illustration of the input pulse structures to represent the four categories of IPL systems all normalized to radiant exposure.
Pulse × typically used for hair removal using four different IPL systems (values are in SI units).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free Discharge | 0.0015 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 1 | 30.00 |
| Square Pulse | 0.0001 | 0.02 | 0.0001 | 0.005 | 1 | 30.00 |
| Close Pulse Stack | 0.0001 | 0.004 | 0.0001 | 0.001 | 7 | 4.29 |
| Spaced Pulse Stack | 0.0001 | 0.002 | 0.0001 | 0.015 | 5 | 6.00 |
Figure 4Absorption coefficients of melanin, oxyhaemoglobin, and water. The IPL emission spectrum used for this evaluation is overlaid for Reference (6).
Figure 5Deflection of a photon at a scattering point.
Figure 6Computer modeling of the epidermis (a) using four types of commercially available temporal profiles with pulse durations of those measured in Reference (7), as depicted in The temperature profile (b) of absorbed light of the four pulse profiles using computer modeling of an in situ hair follicle.