Literature DB >> 22955570

Measuring and modeling patient-specific distributions of material properties in abdominal aortic aneurysm wall.

C Reeps1, A Maier, J Pelisek, F Härtl, V Grabher-Meier, W A Wall, M Essler, H-H Eckstein, M W Gee.   

Abstract

Both the clinically established diameter criterion and novel approaches of computational finite element (FE) analyses for rupture risk stratification of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are based on assumptions of population-averaged, uniform material properties for the AAA wall. The presence of inter-patient and intra-patient variations in material properties is known, but has so far not been addressed sufficiently. In order to enable the preoperative estimation of patient-specific AAA wall properties in the future, we investigated the relationship between non-invasively assessable clinical parameters and experimentally measured AAA wall properties. We harvested n = 163 AAA wall specimens (n = 50 patients) during open surgery and recorded the exact excision sites. Specimens were tested for their thickness, elastic properties, and failure loads using uniaxial tensile tests. In addition, 43 non-invasively assessable patient-specific or specimen-specific parameters were obtained from recordings made during surgery and patient charts. Experimental results were correlated with the non-invasively assessable parameters and simple regression models were created to mathematically describe the relationships. Wall thickness was most significantly correlated with the metabolic activity at the excision site assessed by PET/CT (ρ = 0.499, P = 4 × 10(-7)) and to thrombocyte counts from laboratory blood analyses (ρ = 0.445, P = 3 × 10(-9)). Wall thickness was increased in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus, while it was significantly thinner in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Elastic AAA wall properties had significant correlations with the metabolic activity at the excision site (PET/CT), with existent calcifications, and with the diameter of the non-dilated aorta proximal to the AAA. Failure properties (wall strength and failure tension) had correlations with the patient's medical history and with results from laboratory blood analyses. Interestingly, AAA wall failure tension was significantly reduced for patients with CKD and elevated blood levels of potassium and urea, respectively, both of which are associated with kidney disease. This study is a first step to a future preoperative estimation of AAA wall properties. Results can be conveyed to both the diameter criterion and FE analyses to refine rupture risk prediction. The fact that AAA wall from patients suffering from CKD featured reduced failure tension implies an increased AAA rupture risk for this patient group at comparably smaller AAA diameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22955570     DOI: 10.1007/s10237-012-0436-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  16 in total

1.  Prior Distributions of Material Parameters for Bayesian Calibration of Growth and Remodeling Computational Model of Abdominal Aortic Wall.

Authors:  Sajjad Seyedsalehi; Liangliang Zhang; Jongeun Choi; Seungik Baek
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Microstructure and mechanics of healthy and aneurysmatic abdominal aortas: experimental analysis and modelling.

Authors:  Justyna A Niestrawska; Christian Viertler; Peter Regitnig; Tina U Cohnert; Gerhard Sommer; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Patient-Specific Prediction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion Using Bayesian Calibration.

Authors:  Liangliang Zhang; Zhenxiang Jiang; Jongeun Choi; Chae Young Lim; Tapabrata Maiti; Seungik Baek
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.772

4.  Investigation of material modeling in fluid-structure interaction analysis of an idealized three-layered abdominal aorta: aneurysm initiation and fully developed aneurysms.

Authors:  Fatma Gulden Simsek; Young W Kwon
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 1.365

5.  Progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm towards rupture: refining clinical risk assessment using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction method.

Authors:  Michalis Xenos; Nicos Labropoulos; Suraj Rambhia; Yared Alemu; Shmuel Einav; Apostolos Tassiopoulos; Natzi Sakalihasan; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  Biomechanical Rupture Risk Assessment: A Consistent and Objective Decision-Making Tool for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-04-01

7.  Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms based on a novel probabilistic rupture risk index.

Authors:  Stanislav Polzer; T Christian Gasser
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm-epidemiology, predisposing factors, and biology.

Authors:  Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; M Keese; M Hakimi; A Peters; D Böckler; K Nelson; R T Grundmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Novel Methodology for Characterizing Regional Variations in the Material Properties of Murine Aortas.

Authors:  Matthew R Bersi; Chiara Bellini; Paolo Di Achille; Jay D Humphrey; Katia Genovese; Stéphane Avril
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 10.  Monitoring the biological activity of abdominal aortic aneurysms Beyond Ultrasound.

Authors:  Rachael O Forsythe; David E Newby; Jennifer M J Robson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.