Literature DB >> 22955529

Postoperative radiographs after pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures: are they necessary?

Mara S Karamitopoulos1, Ellen Dean, Aaron G Littleton, Richard Kruse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity of early postoperative radiographs after pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures by determining both the percentage of patients who displayed change in fracture fixation and whether these changes affected their outcome.
METHODS: A series of 643 consecutive patients who underwent operative management of Gartland type II and III fractures at our institution between January 2002 and December 2010 were reviewed. Demographic data were obtained through chart review, including age, sex, extremity, fracture type, and mechanism. Intraoperative fluoroscopic images were compared with postoperative radiographs to identify changes in fracture alignment and pin placement.
RESULTS: A total of 643 patients (320 females, 323 males) with a mean age of 6.1 years (range, 1.1 to 16.0) were reviewed. Fifty-seven percent of fractures were classified as type II and 43% were type III. The overall complication rate was 8.8% (57/643). Pin backout or fracture translation was seen in 32 patients (4.9%) at the first postoperative visit. All of these patients sustained type III fractures. One of these patients required further operative management. Patients with changes in pin or fracture alignment did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in time to first postoperative visit (P=0.23), days to pin removal (P=0.07), or average follow-up time (P=0.10). Fracture severity did not correlate with change in alignment (P=0.952). No postoperative neurological complications were observed in patients with alignment changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Mild alignment changes and pin migration observed in postoperative radiographs after pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures have little effect on clinical management parameters or long-term sequelae. Radiographs can therefore be deferred until the time of pin removal provided adequate intraoperative stability was obtained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22955529     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b2b37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  6 in total

1.  Outcome after pin fixation of supracondylar humerus fractures in children: postoperative radiographic examinations are unnecessary.

Authors:  Noora Tuomilehto; Reetta Kivisaari; Antti Sommarhem; Aarno Y Nietosvaara
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Routine radiographs at time of pin removal after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures do not change management: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sumeet Garg; Nikki Bloch; Micaela Cyr; Patrick Carry
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Intra-Operative Bone Stability Test.

Authors:  Christopher A Iobst; Darvin Bunhor; David L Skaggs; Steven L Frick
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2017-12-25

Review 4.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

5.  The utility of radiographs prior to pin removal after operative treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children.

Authors:  John A Schlechter; Michael Dempewolf
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Is less more? Assessing the utility of early clinical and radiographic follow-up for operative supracondylar humerus fractures.

Authors:  R M Thompson; E W Hubbard; M Elliott; A I Riccio; D J Sucato
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.