Literature DB >> 22955398

Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA.

Sang-Min Kim1, Youn-Soo Park, Chul-Won Ha, Seung-Jae Lim, Young-Wan Moon.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive and robot-assisted procedures have potential advantages when used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this cadaveric study was to examine whether robot-assisted minimally invasive procedures improve TKA alignment after modifying the robotic techniques and instruments. Total knee arthroplasties were performed on 10 pairs of fresh cadaveric femora. Ten knees were replaced using the robot-assisted minimally invasive technique and 10 using the conventional minimally invasive technique. After prosthesis implantation, limb and prosthesis alignments were investigated by measuring mechanical axis deviation, femoral and tibial sagittal and coronal inclination, and femoral rotational alignment with 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Postoperative alignment accuracy of the implanted prostheses was better in the robot-assisted minimally invasive TKA group than in the conventional minimally invasive TKA group as judged by the rotational alignment of the femoral component (0.7°±″.3° vs 3.6°±2.2°, respectively) and the tibial component sagittal angle (7.8°±1.1° vs 5.5°±3.6°, respectively). One sagittal inclination outlier for the tibial side existed in the robotic minimally invasive TKA group, and 2 outliers for the mechanical axis, 2 for the tibial side sagittal inclination, and 2 for the femoral rotational alignment existed in the conventional minimally invasive TKA group. Higher implanted prostheses accuracy and fewer outliers in postoperative radiographic alignments can be attained with robot-assisted TKA. Minimally invasive TKA in combination with an improved robot-assisted technique is an alternative option to compensate for the shortcomings of conventional minimally invasive TKA. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22955398     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120822-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics.

Authors:  Karthik Karuppiah; Joydeep Sinha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Robotic-assisted surgery and kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty (RASKAL study): a protocol of a national registry-nested, multicentre, 2×2 factorial randomised trial assessing clinical, intraoperative, functional, radiographic and survivorship outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel J MacDessi; Gregory C Wernecke; Durga Bastiras; Tamara Hooper; Emma Heath; Michelle Lorimer; Ian Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Accelerometer-Based Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Management of Extra-Articular Deformity and Retained Femoral Hardware: Analysis of Component Alignment.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Matteo Innocenti; Fabrizio Matassi; Marco Villano; Roberto Civinini; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2019-10-11

5.  Verification and clinical translation of a newly designed "Skywalker" robot for total knee arthroplasty: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Runzhi Xia; Zanjing Zhai; Jingwei Zhang; Degang Yu; Liao Wang; Yuanqing Mao; Zhenan Zhu; Haishan Wu; Kerong Dai; Mengning Yan; Huiwu Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Current Controversies of Alignment in Total Knee Replacements.

Authors:  James Donaldson; James Joyner; Francois Tudor
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-09-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.