Literature DB >> 22955249

Prognostic molecular markers and neoadjuvant therapy response in anthracycline-treated breast cancer patients.

David L Wachter1, Peter A Fasching, Lothar Haeberle, Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland, Arno Dimmler, Thomas Koscheck, Stefan P Renner, Michael P Lux, Matthias W Beckmann, Arndt Hartmann, Claudia Rauh, Michael G Schrauder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identifying biomarkers that can predict the prognosis and treatment response is helpful for individualizing breast cancer (BC) therapy. A neoadjuvant treatment setting is ideal for testing biomarkers capable of predicting the treatment response. This study analyzed the value of immunohistochemical biomarkers for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) and prognosis in a group of BC patients receiving standardized treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 BC patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) between 2000 and 2005. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded core biopsies were taken before chemotherapy for immunohistochemical staining of ER, PgR, HER2, Bcl-2, p53, cyclin D1, CK5/6, CK8, CK18, and TOP2A. Patient and tumor characteristics and biomarker scores were used to predict pCR and prognosis, using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: pCR was achieved in 11 patients and was predicted by the established marker Ki-67. In addition, CK5/6 and CK18 improved the prediction model and were associated with lower pCR rates. For the prognosis, only the established markers nodal status, Ki-67, and PgR predicted overall survival and nodal status; Ki-67 and PgR predicted distant disease-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: In this small retrospective study, CK5/6 and CK18 appeared to improve prediction of pCR in addition to the established markers. CK5/6 may indicate a tumor type resembling a basal phenotype that is more resistant to anthracycline-based therapy, and CK18 may indicate a luminal subtype that is more resistant to chemotherapy. However, these results need to be replicated in larger studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22955249     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2534-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

Review 1.  [New prognostic and predictive markers for breast cancer].

Authors:  D L Wachter
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  High expression of cyclin D1 is associated to high proliferation rate and increased risk of mortality in women with ER-positive but not in ER-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Cecilia Ahlin; Claudia Lundgren; Elin Embretsén-Varro; Karin Jirström; Carl Blomqvist; M -L Fjällskog
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Prognostic value and clinicopathological significance of serum- and tissue-based cytokeratin 18 express level in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiangling Yang; Sicheng Gao; Jian Xu; Junfeng Zhu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  Predictors of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Weilin Xu; Xiu Chen; Fei Deng; Jian Zhang; Wei Zhang; Jinhai Tang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Copy number variation and high expression of DNA topoisomerase II alpha predict worse prognosis of cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Ren; Jingwei Liu; Kaihua Gou; Chengzhong Xing
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.207

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.