Literature DB >> 22955004

A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material.

Jan W V van Dijken1, Ulla Pallesen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical retention of a one-step self-etching adhesive system (Xeno III) in Class V non-carious cervical lesions and the effect of restorative material and curing techniques on longevity of the restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 139 Class V restorations were placed with the self-etching primer Xeno III and a resin composite (Tetric Ceram) or a poly-acid modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in non-carious cervical lesions without intentional enamel involvement. The materials were cured with a conventional continuous light, a soft-start or a pulse-delay curing mode. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and then yearly during a 7 year follow-up with modified USPHS criteria. Dentine bonding efficiency was determined by the percentage of lost restorations.
RESULTS: During the 7 years, 135 restorations could be evaluated. No post-operative sensitivity was reported by the participants. Overall relative cumulative loss rate frequencies for the adhesive system at 6 and 18 months and 7 years, independent of curing technique and restorative material, were 0.8%, 6.9% and 23.0%, respectively. The self-etching adhesive fulfilled at 18 months the full acceptance ADA criteria. Tetric Ceram showed at 7 years a 20.9% loss of retention and Dyract AP a 25.0% loss rate (Log rank p = 0.48). The loss rates for the 3 curing techniques: continuous, soft start and pulse delay were 17%, 27.9% and 24.4%, respectively (Log rank p = 0.52). No secondary caries was observed. SIGNIFICANCE: The single-step self-etching adhesive showed acceptable clinical long-time retention rates to dentine surfaces independent of restorative material and curing technique used.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22955004     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  6 in total

Review 1.  Retention of tooth-colored restorations in non-carious cervical lesions--a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Jacinta Moraes Coelho Santos; Nilgun Ari; Shawn Steele; John Costella; David Banting
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Low-Shrinkage Resin Matrices in Restorative Dentistry-Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ebtehal G Albeshir; Rashed Alsahafi; Reem Albluwi; Abdulrahman A Balhaddad; Heba Mitwalli; Thomas W Oates; Gary D Hack; Jirun Sun; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Five-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Kirsten L Van Landuyt; Jan De Munck; R Banu Ermis; Marleen Peumans; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  An in vitro evaluation of the effects of desensitizing agents on microleakage of Class V cavities.

Authors:  İhsan Yikilgan; Sinem Akgul; Suat Özcan; Oya Bala; Hüma Ömürlü
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-02-01

5.  The effect of bonding and surface sealant application on postoperative sensitivity from posterior composites.

Authors:  Neslihan Tekce; Mustafa Demirci; Sultan Aslıhan Gokturk; Safa Tuncer; Emre Ozel; Kansad Pala; Canan Baydemir
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-10-21

6.  Composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions-Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable?

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Lührs; Silke Jacker-Guhr; Hüsamettin Günay; Peggy Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-09-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.