Literature DB >> 22954546

The sharp reductions in medicare payments for noninvasive diagnostic imaging in recent years: will they satisfy the federal policymakers?

David C Levin1, Vijay M Rao, Laurence Parker, Andrea J Frangos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine recent trends in Medicare reimbursements for noninvasive diagnostic imaging (NDI).
METHODS: The Medicare Part B databases for 2000 to 2010 were used. For each procedure code, these files provide payment and other data. All NDI codes were selected. Medicare physician specialty codes were used to identify radiologists, cardiologists, all other nonradiologist physicians as a group, and independent diagnostic testing facilities. Part B NDI payment trends were tracked.
RESULTS: Overall Part B spending for NDI rose from $5.921 billion in 2000 to $11.910 billion in 2006 (+101%). There was then a sharp drop in 2007, resulting from the implementation of the Deficit Reduction Act. This was followed by a slight rise in 2008, then successive smaller drops the next 2 years, reaching $9.457 billion in 2010 (-21% vs 2006). Radiologists' payments were $2.936 billion in 2000, rose to a peak of $5.3 billion in 2006 (+81%), then dropped to $4.712 billion in 2010 (-11% vs 2006). Cardiologists' NDI payments were $1.327 billion in 2000, peaking at $2.998 billion in 2006 (+126%), then dropping to $1.996 billion in 2010 (-33% vs 2006). Other physicians' payments were $1.106 billion in 2000, peaking at $2.378 billion in 2006 (+115%), then dropping to $1.968 billion in 2010 (-17% vs 2006). Similar trends occurred in independent diagnostic testing facilities.
CONCLUSIONS: After years of rapid growth in Medicare NDI payments, an abrupt reversal occurred starting in 2007. By 2010, overall NDI costs to Medicare Part B were down 21% compared with their 2006 peak. It is unclear whether this large payment reduction will satisfy federal policymakers.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22954546     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  5 in total

1.  Changes in Physician Practice Patterns after Implementation of a Communication-and-Resolution Program.

Authors:  Lorens A Helmchen; Bruce L Lambert; Timothy B McDonald
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Stress-only imaging: faster, cheaper, less radiation. So what's the hold up?

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; Lori B Croft; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Neuroimaging overuse is more common in Medicare compared with the VA.

Authors:  James F Burke; Eve A Kerr; Ryan J McCammon; Rob Holleman; Kenneth M Langa; Brian C Callaghan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Trends in Diagnostic Imaging Utilization among Medicare and Commercially Insured Adults from 2003 through 2016.

Authors:  Arthur S Hong; David Levin; Laurence Parker; Vijay M Rao; Dennis Ross-Degnan; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 29.146

5.  Kidney Cancer Incidence in California: End of the Trend?

Authors:  Cyllene R Morris; Primo N Lara; Arti Parikh-Patel; Kenneth W Kizer
Journal:  Kidney Cancer       Date:  2017-07-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.