Literature DB >> 22954073

Recent trends in clinicians providing care to pregnant women in the United States.

Katy Backes Kozhimannil1, Melissa D Avery, Carrie Ann Terrell.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health care needs of pregnant women are met by a variety of clinicians in a changing policy and practice environment. This study documents recent trends in types of clinicians providing care to pregnant women in the United States.
METHODS: We used a repeat cross-sectional design and data from the Integrated Health Interview Series (2000-2009), a nationally representative data set, for respondents who reported being pregnant at the time of the survey (N = 3204). Using longitudinal logistic regression models, we analyzed changes over time in pregnant women's reported use of care from 1) obstetrician-gynecologists; 2) midwives, nurse practitioners (NPs), or physician assistants (PAs); or 3) both an obstetrician-gynecologist and a midwife, NP, or PA.
RESULTS: The percentage of pregnant women who reported seeing an obstetrician-gynecologist (87%) remained steady from 2000 through 2009. After controlling for demographic and clinical variables, the percentage who reported receiving care from a midwife, NP, or PA increased 4% annually (yearly adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.04; P < .001), indicating a cumulative increase of 48% over the decade. The percentage of pregnant women who received care from both an obstetrician-gynecologist and a midwife, NP, or PA also increased (AOR 1.027; P < .001), for a cumulative increase of 30%. DISCUSSION: The increasing role of midwives, NPs, and PAs in the provision of maternity care suggests changes in the perinatal workforce and practice models that may promote collaborative care and quality improvement. However, better data collection is required to gather detailed information on specific provider types, these trends, and their implications.
© 2012 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22954073     DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00171.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  5 in total

1.  Care from family physicians reported by pregnant women in the United States.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Patricia Fontaine
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Maternal clinical diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Mariana C Arcaya; S V Subramanian
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Carol Sakala
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Determinants of rural-urban differences in health care provider visits among women of reproductive age in the United States.

Authors:  Hyunjung Lee; Ashley H Hirai; Ching-Ching Claire Lin; John E Snyder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Rural-Urban Differences in the Utilization of Hospital-Based Care for Women of Reproductive Age.

Authors:  Ching-Ching Claire Lin; Hyunjung Lee; John E Snyder
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-01-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.