| Literature DB >> 22952737 |
Weina Ma1, Sheng Lu, Pei Pan, Parisa Sadatmousavi, Yongfang Yuan, P Chen.
Abstract
The amino acid pairing peptide EAK16-II (EAK) has shown the ability to stabilize the hydrophobic anticancer agent ellipticine (EPT) in aqueous solution. In this study, we investigate pharmacokinetics of the formulation of EAK-EPT complexes in vivo. The developed formulation can achieve a sufficiently high drug concentration required in vivo animal models. The nanostructure and surface properties of EAK-EPT complexes or nanoparticle were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and zeta potential measurements, respectively. 12 healthy male SD rats were divided into EPT group and EAK-EPT group randomly. Rats in EPT group were tail intravenously injected with the EPT (20 mg/kg); rats in EAK-EPT group were injected with EAK-EPT complexes (EPT's concentration is 20 mg/kg). EPT was extracted from rat plasma with dexamethasone sodium phosphate as internal standards (IS). The pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Significant differences in main pharmacokinetic parameters between EPT and EAK-EPT complexes were observed, demonstrating that the complexation with EAK prolongs the residence time of the drug and enlarges the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). This means that EAK can serve as a suitable carrier to increase the bioavailability of EPT.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22952737 PMCID: PMC3432029 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Molecular structures of the self-assembling peptide EAK16-II (EAK).
Figure 2Molecular structure of ellipticine (EPT).
Figure 3TEM images of (A) EAK16-II, and (B) EAK-EPT.
Bar is 100 nm.
The zeta potentials (mean±S.D., n = 10) of EAK-EPT complexes.
| Concentration of EAK in EAK-EPT complexes (mg/mL) | Zeta potential (mV) |
| 3.0 | 67.0±5.66 |
| 1.5 | 33.4±3.97 |
| 1.0 | 33.6±3.62 |
| 0.5 | 37.4±3.59 |
| 0.3 | 39.0±4.19 |
| 0.1 | 38.0±4.06 |
The mass ratios between EAK and EPT were kept at 2∶1.
Figure 4Representative chromatograms of (A) blank plasma; (B) plasma added with EPT (1.56 µg/mL) and IS (dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 2.5 mg/mL); (C) plasma sample after intravenous injection of EPT (3 h); (D) plasma sample after intravenous injection of EAK-EPT (3 h).
The validation of intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy with EPT QC samples (n = 5).
| Concentration (µg/mL) | Precision (RSD %) | Accuracy (%) | ||
| Intra-day | Inter-day | Intra-day | Inter-day | |
| 0.05 | 5.10 | 6.33 | 106.23 | 109.14 |
| 0.39 | 2.32 | 2.07 | 102.71 | 104.26 |
| 3.13 | 1.09 | 1.01 | 99.17 | 98.94 |
Figure 5Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of EPT in SD rats (n = 6) after single intravenous injection of EPT and EAK-EPT at a dose of 20 mg of EPT per kg of body weight.
Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean±S.D., n = 6) of EPT after single intravenous injection of EPT and EAK-EPT at a dose of 20 mg of EPT per kg of body weight.
| Parameters | EPT | EAK-EPT |
| Cmax (µg/mL) | 1.75±0.10 | 1.63±0.04 |
| tmax (h) | 0.50±0.00 | 0.50±0.00 |
| T1/2α (h) | 4.50±0.71 | 6.69±0.27 |
| T1/2β (h) | 4.75±0.18 | 6.71±0.26 |
| CL (mL/h) | 1.38±0.03 | 1.09±0.02 |
| MRT (h) | 5.78±0.10 | 6.24±0.13 |
| AUC (h⋅µg/mL) | 12.29±0.27 | 14.89±0.36 |
p<0.05 compared with EPT group;
p<0.01 compared with EPT group.