BACKGROUND: The presence of extra-hepatic disease (EHD) is no longer an absolute contraindication to surgery in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Recently, a novel prognostic model predicting overall survival in such patients was proposed using five risk factors (EHD other than isolated lung metastases, CEA ≥10 ng/ml, >5 liver metastases, right colon as the primary CRC location, and diagnosis of EHD concomitant to CRLM recurrence). A bi-institutional database was used to perform an external validation of this model. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients operated for CRLM and EHD between 1982 and 2011 in two institutions was analyzed. The proposed prognostic model was validated in this cohort using Cox proportional hazards models and the concordance index (c). RESULTS: Of the five proposed risk factors, only EHD other than isolated lung metastases was found to independently predict overall survival [Hazards Ratio (HR) = 2.10 (95% CI: 1.01-4.40)]. Although, the number of risk factors was marginally associated with overall survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.049), the performance of the proposed prognostic model was poor when applied to our cohort (c = 0.64). CONCLUSION: The examined prognostic model of survival in patients with CRLM and EHD had poor performance. Further research is warranted to delineate the subset of patients who will benefit from surgery.
BACKGROUND: The presence of extra-hepatic disease (EHD) is no longer an absolute contraindication to surgery in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Recently, a novel prognostic model predicting overall survival in such patients was proposed using five risk factors (EHD other than isolated lung metastases, CEA ≥10 ng/ml, >5 liver metastases, right colon as the primary CRC location, and diagnosis of EHD concomitant to CRLM recurrence). A bi-institutional database was used to perform an external validation of this model. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients operated for CRLM and EHD between 1982 and 2011 in two institutions was analyzed. The proposed prognostic model was validated in this cohort using Cox proportional hazards models and the concordance index (c). RESULTS: Of the five proposed risk factors, only EHD other than isolated lung metastases was found to independently predict overall survival [Hazards Ratio (HR) = 2.10 (95% CI: 1.01-4.40)]. Although, the number of risk factors was marginally associated with overall survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.049), the performance of the proposed prognostic model was poor when applied to our cohort (c = 0.64). CONCLUSION: The examined prognostic model of survival in patients with CRLM and EHD had poor performance. Further research is warranted to delineate the subset of patients who will benefit from surgery.
Authors: William J Hadden; Philip R de Reuver; Kai Brown; Anubhav Mittal; Jaswinder S Samra; Thomas J Hugh Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Alyson L Mahar; Carolyn Compton; Susan Halabi; Kenneth R Hess; Martin R Weiser; Patti A Groome Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Orlando Jorge Martins Torres; Márcio Carmona Marques; Fabio Nasser Santos; Igor Correia de Farias; Anelisa Kruschewsky Coutinho; Cássio Virgílio Cavalcante de Oliveira; Antonio Nocchi Kalil; Celso Abdon Lopes de Mello; Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger; Gustavo Dos Santos Fernandes; Claudemiro Quireze; André M Murad; Milton José de Barros E Silva; Charles Edouard Zurstrassen; Helano Carioca Freitas; Marcelo Rocha Cruz; Rui Weschenfelder; Marcelo Moura Linhares; Leonaldson Dos Santos Castro; Charles Vollmer; Elijah Dixon; Héber Salvador de Castro Ribeiro; Felipe José Fernandez Coimbra Journal: Arq Bras Cir Dig Date: 2016 Jul-Sep