| Literature DB >> 22951488 |
P Pommier1, M Morelle, L Perrier, R de Crevoisier, A Laplanche, P Dudouet, M-A Mahé, B Chauvet, T-D Nguyen, G Créhange, A Zawadi, O Chapet, I Latorzeff, A Bossi, V Beckendorf, E Touboul, X Muracciole, J-M Bachaud, S Supiot, J-L Lagrange.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The main objective of the economical study was to prospectively and randomly assess the additional costs of daily versus weekly patient positioning quality control in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), taking into account the modalities of the 3D-imaging: tomography (CBCT) or gold seeds implants. A secondary objective was to prospectively assess the additional costs of 3D versus 2D imaging with portal imaging for patient positioning controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Economics data are issued from a multicenter randomized medico-economics trial comparing the two frequencies of patient positioning control during prostate IGRT. A prospective cohort with patient positioning control with PI (control group) was constituted for the cost comparison between 3D (IGRT) versus 2D imaging. The economical evaluation was focused to the radiotherapy direct costs, adopting the hospital's point of view and using a microcosting method applied to the parameters that may lead to cost differences between evaluated strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22951488 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2012.07.178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Radiother ISSN: 1278-3218 Impact factor: 1.018