Literature DB >> 22951145

What factors contribute most to the retention of general practitioners in rural and remote areas?

Deborah J Russell1, Matthew R McGrail, John S Humphreys, John Wakerman.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to measure the relative strength, significance and contribution of factors associated with rural and remote medical workforce retention. Length of stay data from two Australian GP workforce datasets, the 2008 National Minimum Data Set (4223 GPs) and a subset of the 2008 Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life dataset (1189 GPs), were separately analysed using multiple linear regression models and the results compared. Length of employment in their current practice location was the outcome measure. Consistent results were obtained across both datasets. The most important factors associated with the retention of rural and remote GPs, after adjusting for GP age, were primary income source, registrar status, hospital work and restrictions on practice location (which are linked to geographic location). Practice ownership was associated with -70% higher retention than average, whilst undertaking hospital work in addition to routine general practice was associated with at least 18% higher retention compared with if no hospital work was undertaken. Less important factors included geographic location, procedural skills, annual leave, workload and practice size. Our findings quantify a range of financial and economic, professional and organisational, and geographic factors contributing to the retention of rural GPs. These findings have important implications for future medical workforce policy, providing an empirical evidence base to support the targeting and 'bundling' of retention initiatives in order to optimise the retention of rural GPs.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22951145     DOI: 10.1071/PY11049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Prim Health        ISSN: 1448-7527            Impact factor:   1.307


  6 in total

1.  Addressing provider turnover to improve health outcomes in Nunavut.

Authors:  Maria Cherba; Gwen K Healey Akearok; W Alexander MacDonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Explaining primary care physicians' decision to quit patient-centered medical homes: Evidence from Quebec, Canada.

Authors:  Mehdi Ammi; Mamadou Diop; Erin Strumpf
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The value of survival analyses for evidence-based rural medical workforce planning.

Authors:  Deborah J Russell; John S Humphreys; Matthew R McGrail; W Ian Cameron; Peter J Williams
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2013-12-11

Review 4.  Reviewing reliance on overseas-trained doctors in rural Australia and planning for self-sufficiency: applying 10 years' MABEL evidence.

Authors:  Belinda O'Sullivan; Deborah J Russell; Matthew R McGrail; Anthony Scott
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2019-01-22

5.  The gap in human resources to deliver the guaranteed package of prevention and health promotion services at urban and rural primary care facilities in Mexico.

Authors:  Jacqueline Elizabeth Alcalde-Rabanal; Gustavo Nigenda; Till Bärnighausen; Héctor Eduardo Velasco-Mondragón; Blair Grant Darney
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2017-08-03

6.  Examining positive views from students, trainees and GPs about general practice: a generational problem? A set of qualitative studies in France.

Authors:  Bernard Le Floc'h; Hilde Bastiaens; Jean-Yves Le Reste; Patrice Nabbe; Tristan Montier; Lieve Peremans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.