Literature DB >> 22950484

A randomised comparison of two intranasal dexmedetomidine doses for premedication in children.

V M Yuen1, T W Hui, M G Irwin, T J Yao, L Chan, G L Wong, M Shahnaz Hasan, I I Shariffuddin.   

Abstract

We compared sedation levels in children following administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine. One hundred and sixteen children aged between 1 and 8 years were enrolled in this prospective, randomised trial. Children were assigned to receive either intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg.kg(-1) (Group 1) or 2 μg.kg(-1) (Group 2). Thirty-one (53%) patients from Group 1 and 38 (66%) patients from Group 2 were satisfactorily sedated at the time of anaesthetic induction. Logistic regression showed a significant interaction effect (p=0.049), with the odds ratio between Group 2 over Group 1 estimated as 1.1 (95% CI 0.5-2.7) for the 1-4 year age group, and 10.5 (95% CI 1.4-80.2) for the 5-8 year age group. Both doses produced a similar level of satisfactory sedation in children aged 1-4 years, whereas 2 μg.kg(-1) resulted in a higher proportion of satisfactory sedation in children aged 5-8 years. There were no adverse haemodynamic effects. We conclude that intranasal dexmedetomidine in a premedication dose of 2 μg.kg(-1) resulted in excellent sedation in children. Anaesthesia
© 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22950484     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07309.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  21 in total

Review 1.  Options and Considerations for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Imaging.

Authors:  John W Berkenbosch
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Dexmedetomidine Plus Buccal Midazolam for Non-painful Procedural Sedation in Children with Autism.

Authors:  Bi Lian Li; Vivian Man-Ying Yuen; Na Zhang; Huan Huan Zhang; Jun Xiang Huang; Si Yuan Yang; Jeffery W Miller; Xing Rong Song
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-09

3.  Feasibility of measuring memory response to increasing dexmedetomidine sedation in children.

Authors:  K P Mason; E R Kelhoffer; R Prescilla; M Mehta; J C Root; V J Young; F Robinson; R A Veselis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Comparative Effectiveness of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam versus Oral Chloral Hydrate Targeting Moderate Sedation during Pediatric Transthoracic Echocardiograms.

Authors:  Jordan Fett; Richard Hackbarth; Brian M Boville; Anthony D Olivero; Alan T Davis; John W Winters
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2016-12-26

5.  Pain management following myringotomy and tube placement: intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal fentanyl.

Authors:  Elisabeth Dewhirst; Gina Fedel; Vidya Raman; Julie Rice; N'Diris Barry; Kris R Jatana; Charles Elmaraghy; Meredith Merz; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Comparison of Efficacy of Premedication between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam Intranasal for the Prevention of Emergence Delirium in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery.

Authors:  Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan; Irwan Mahri; Riyadh Firdaus; Ardhie Sugiarto
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2021-12

7.  A prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing MRI.

Authors:  Mohamed Ibrahim
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2014 May-Aug

8.  Pediatric premedication: a double-blind randomized trial of dexmedetomidine or ketamine alone versus a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine.

Authors:  Hui Qiao; Zhi Xie; Jie Jia
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 9.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine.

Authors:  Maud A S Weerink; Michel M R F Struys; Laura N Hannivoort; Clemens R M Barends; Anthony R Absalom; Pieter Colin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam as premedication for brain magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: A prospective randomized double blind trial.

Authors:  Ayushi Gupta; Naina Parag Dalvi; Bharati Anil Tendolkar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.