| Literature DB >> 22949811 |
Damian C Onwudiwe1, Peter A Ajibade1.
Abstract
The thermal decomposition of Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) complexes of N-ethyl-N-phenyl and N-butyl-N-phenyl dithiocarbamates have been studied using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The products of the decomposition, at two different temperatures, were further characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The results show that while the zinc and cadmium complexes undergo decomposition to form metal sulphides, and further undergo oxidation forming metal oxides as final products, the mercury complexes gave unstable volatiles as the final product.Entities:
Keywords: Group 12 metals; differential scanning calorimetry; dithiocarbamates; thermal behavior; thermogravimetric analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22949811 PMCID: PMC3431809 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13089502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Superimposed thermogravimetric (TG), differential thermogravimetric (DTG) and differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) curves for zinc complexes (ZnL12 and ZnL22).
Figure 3Superimposed TG/DTG/DSC curves for mercury complexes (HgL12 and HgL22).
Temperature values for decomposition along with corresponding weight loss values.
| Compounds | Decomposition range (°C) | Peak temperature (°C) | Percentageweight loss (%) | Productexpected | Residue state/colour | Mass changesCalc. (Found) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Zn(S2CN(C2H5)(C6H5))2]ZnL12 | 496–631 | 59 | 73.7 | ZnS | Black crystals | 2.50 (2.90) |
| 4809 | 81.8 | ZnO | Grey ash powder | 2.07 (2.04) | ||
|
| ||||||
| [Cd(S2CN(C2H5)(C6H5))2]CdL12 | 542–634 | 606 | 66.7 | CdS | Yellowish-green powder | 3.07 (3.10) |
| 761 | 69.8 | CdO | Brown powder | 2.72 (2.14) | ||
|
| ||||||
| [Hg(S2CN(C2H5)(C6H5))2]HgL12 | 453–591 | 532 | 57.3 | HgS | Black powder | 4.13 (4.01) |
| 683 | 97.8 | S | - | 0.56 (0.55) | ||
|
| ||||||
| [Zn(S2CN(C4H9)(C6H5))2]ZnL22 | 494–644 | 591 | 76.1 | ZnS | Black crystals | 1.80 (2.10) |
| 861 | 83.6 | ZnO | Grey ash powder | 1.50 (1.50) | ||
|
| ||||||
| [Cd(S2CN(C4H9)(C6H5))2]CdL22 | 503–642 | 599 | 70.8 | CdS | Yellowish-green powder | 3.88 (3.24) |
| 709 | 72.5 | CdO | Yellowish brown powder | 2.56 (2.90) | ||
|
| ||||||
| [Hg(S2CN(C4H9)(C6H5))2]HgL22 | 484–618 | 575 | 80.3 | HgS | Black powder | 1.80 (1.85) |
| 669 | 97.3 | S | - | 0.27 (0.29) | ||
Scheme 1Decomposition pattern for the zinc and cadmium complexes.
Figure 4(a) Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) of the decomposed products from complex ZnL22 at 400 °C; (b) EDX of the decomposed products from complex ZnL22 at 800 °C.
Figure 6EDX of the decomposed products from complex HgL22 at 350 °C.
Figure 5(a) EDX of the decomposed products from complex CdL22 at 400 °C; (b) EDX of the decomposed products from complex CdL22 at 800 °C.